- Enter the Title of the procedure.
- Add the following Labels Labels:
- Region: apac, emea, lam, nam
- Domain & Process using the List of labels to be used in the PtP space
- Fill all fields as described
- Once the procedure is completed, publish it using thePtP Procure to Pay approval workflow
Objective
This document describes:
The global process overview
The vendor master data flow and information that must be updated at the different systems.
“Supplier Financing Program" Process Flow
NAM/EMEA
LAM/APAC
The procedures and controls implemented
The different tasks that must performed by different teams/persons along the process.
Supplier Financing context
Payment terms have been significantly worked out over the past years especially for large suppliers
Suppliers do look after cash and are not keen on increasing payment terms without any counter benefit
Cash management (forecast, flexibility, …) is an increasing area of focus for suppliers
Solvay benefits from attractive financing rates on markets, potentially more attractive than suppliers in some cases
The objective is:
Focus on large suppliers only (~>2/3m€ spend)
Bring to the table an added value innovative system for both suppliers and Solvay
Enhance cash management optimisation for both parties
Enable flexibility and tailoring approach for both parties
Solvay negotiates extended payment terms in exchange of what:
Solvay processes received invoices and approves them
When invoice approved, supplier can ask for payment before invoice maturity systematically or punctually
If so, supplier paid by banking partner upon request & charged at a cost based on LIBOR & Solvay credit standings, for instance, DB proposed fee: 1,48% APR
Solvay pays banking partner at maturity while continuing to manage PO, reception & invoice workflow
The benefits will be:
Enhanced supplier relationship management through the provision of innovative added value service to suppliers
Increased payment terms & enhanced working capital
No recurring costs for Solvay (“project” resources & systems set up only)
Flexible on boarding model as Solvay selects suppliers to be integrated and can adapt pricing mechanisms to suppliers
Structural working capital optimisation rather than end of period short term optimisations
Able to manage cash efficiently & with flexibility (automatic discounting or invoice cherry picking discount): conversion of receivables into cash when and if desired
No service, set-up or unused credit lines fees
Captures Solvay financial markets attractiveness when relevant
Represent an alternative supplier “low cost” funding lever
At least, on time payment secured
Global Overview
Master data Maintenance
Tanguy Moentack, Nathalie Manirakiza, Flavio Ciampaglia and Thomas Warnotte are in charge of the activation and change of SCF suppliers. All requests must be sent to Nathalie and Flavio with Tanguy in copy for approval before the activation/deactivation (Thomas is the leader).
Currently there are these JP Morgan Vendors Created:
Vendor Name City Country 2113681 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA NEW YORK USA 2823930 J P MORGAN CHASE BANK LONDON UNITED KINGDOM 4009699 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK (CHINA) CO LTD SHANGHAI CHINA 9901018838 BANCO J P MORGAN S A SAO PAULO BRAZIL 4206355 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION MUMBAI INDIA
4506050 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK BANGKOK THAILAND
NOTE 1: Whenever confirmed a new JPM bank account the remaining bank types cannot be changed.
NOTE 2: SFP program is now running for Solvay Sodi in Bulgaria (CoCd 3438).
The set up is the same except for the factoring company. The only difference is instead of being JP Morgan it will be ING Bank (Vendor number 502562995).
The first vendor to be set up was vendor 602607403 so in case of doubt, you can use this vendor as a reference.
PF1_050
The first step is update the master data of the vendor classifying as a SFP vendor (supplier financing program) using XK02:
Then, insert the Permitted Payee (choice based on the suppliers region) using XK02:
PF1_020 and WP1_400
Maintain SFP - SM30 - Z1Y_SFP_SEL_ERP. The company code will be provided by the requester:
Then, the Payment Terms (provided by the requester) have to be update at Company and Purchasing Level (company, purchasing or plant view).
NOTE: NAM/EMEA - Ensure Vendor master data is aligned with PI1
- Company view (using XK02):
- Purchasing view (using XK02): Check the Purchasing Organization where Vendor is currently created using MKVZ or SE16_LFM1. It is only changed in PF1_020. In the WP1 system the Payment Term is updated only at Plant level.
- Plant view (using XK02): Check the Plants where Vendor is currently linked using SE16_LFM2. It is only changed in the plants for the same country as the company(s) code(s). This action applies only for WP1 vendors.
The plants not linked to the vendor must be linked if the payment term provided for SFP is different from the one already in the Purchasing Organization(s).
The transaction SQ00 (Query areas - Standard Area ; Other user group: ZW_PU ; Query: ZMM-026) will provide you the list of plants by company:
For example a vendor linked only for the PO 3001:
| The Plants 0214, 0215, 8058 and 8198 will need to the added or updated. |
To add or update you click in the field Different Data:
NOTE: In PF1 we have transversal Purchasing Organizations, where the change will impact other Company Codes. All Porgs. starting with Z***, no change should be done at all levels and Requester will need to be informed, in order to renegotiate the SFP contract to all company codes instead. Example: ZC30 Foc. Packaging. Message to be sent: "This request will impact Purchase Organizations that are shared with other company codes where the Vendor is also created and not included on the initial request. Impacted Purchase Organizations & Company codes:
|
|---|
AP, Proviosioning and Materials team
After the update made at vendors level the ticket needs to be transferred to the Materials team. They will analyse and update active contracts.
Hereafter, the requester is informed and, if not provided in the initial request, ask if:
- Open items must be updated (If the answer is Yes transfer request to AP, and afterward, they should inform SC Payments, we don't need the ticket back)
- Open POs must be updated (if the answer is Yes transfer request to Provisioning stating the Purch Org. and Plants impacted, and afterward, they should inform SC Payments, we don't need the ticket back)
If the answer is YES to both questions, ask Provisioning to transfer the ticket to AP and afterward, they should inform SC Payments, we don't need the ticket back.
Annual Review
The annual review is done by Data Operations Lisbon Team, normally in the beginning of the year, referent to the previous year, and the final report should be sent to Tanguy Moentack; Nathalie Manirakiza; Flavio Ciampaglia with the Manager Thomas Warnotte in cc.
The Template Annual Review should be used and all data should be storage in the Shared drive.
| Extract the data available in SAP | ||
|---|---|---|
| (1) (3) | (2) (4) |
| (1) (3) | (2) (4) |
| (1) (2) | |
- Send an email via Freshdesk to the following users:
- Email Template:
- Dear Purchasing Performance Team,
We are contacting you due to the annual review related to the SFP Table (where all the suppliers selected to be part of the program are managed), we will need your support in order to review the values under this table and confirm is all remain valid or if any update needs to be preform in order to align the information between your Team and Data Operations Team.
In case of support, assistance, or any further clarification please don't hesitate in contacting us.
Your confirmation is key to ensure the proper flow in our organizations.
Thank you in advance and have a nice day!
Best regards,
- Follow-up
- After 15 days if no reply a follow-up email should be sent and if after more 15 days still no answer, a third and last email will be sent informing that the Annual Review has been concluded, that the table will remain with the current values and no update will be done until further notice.
To join
When a new company (affiliate) joins the program, the following actions must be taken:
LAM/APAC - Update Variant (Z1Y_SFP_COCKPIT_ERP) PF1/WP1
Varint: LAM
Varint: APAC
NAM/EMEA - Update Variant (Z3Y_SFP_COCKPIT) - PI1
PI1 variants:
EMEA
NAM
Supplier Financing
Who does What?
PSCE Perfomance Manager (J. Capellano) selects suppliers
PSCE Perfomance Manager (J. Capellano) signs contract
PSCE informs PtP SC AP + Data of each region
PtP Data sets up SFP master Data (clarify scope based on company code = payment terms at all levels)
PtP AP confirms cut-off (clarify scope based on company code)
PtP AP updates payment method and criterias for payment in Payment Factory or in local payment
PtP AP runs job with daily file sent to JP Morgan (with open items from Vendor) - file per region (same program with different variants)
If doesn’t run...null and run again
JP Morgan confirms reception (PtP doesn’t monitor sending today)
Solvay pays JP Morgan at invoice due date = Payment Terms for JP Morgan
Credit notes due dates (to be confirmed)
SFP Cockpit I and FI II- Update Permitted Payee at the time of posting
Comex (External Commerce) - external supplier invoices - generated by SC CUR (to confirm) - Load to cockpit?
Suppliers receives payment advice from JP Morgan
JP receives payment advice from Solvay













