| Status |
| ||||||
| Owner | Gautier Todeschini | ||||||
| Stakeholders | LEAP Steering Committee; Business Representatives |
...
| Info |
|---|
Decision: Option 3 Decision made by: Business Steering Committee Date: Online Meeting: MS Programme Business SteerCo (organized by R. Clerc) |
Issue
Due to the size and complexity of the organization, the migration must be executed in manageable "waves," with each wave containing approximatively 4000 users (no more than 5,000).
A key challenge is ensuring business continuity and minimizing disruption, while also accommodating specific group preferences and technical constraints.
Background & Context
- Wave Structure: The migration is divided into four personal data waves (1-4) and one wave of shared data (5).
- Stakeholder Involvement: The proposal was validated in the Business Steerco on February 17th, with input from business representatives and leadership teams.
- Industrial sites working during weekends: Identified as critical operation, with specific concerns on Composite Materials side - requires dedicated migration batches for sub-populations during cutover weekends, to limit the soft data freeze period.
Wave preparation process
Assumptions
General assumptions:
- March 2026 update: Oil & Gas are out of scope of the migration due to the ongoing carve-out
- Decided in Business Steerco on 17/02/26: no hybrid approach will be considered with sites populated by many different functions: Silex to link with IT, Aubervilliers to link to Novecare & Aroma, Explorer ...
- Decided in Business Steerco on 17/02/26: VIPs will be migrated along with their GBUs, not separately
...
- To be considered in the beginning of the migration:
- IT (already heavily involved in pilots + typical first wave population & able to support their peers)
- One Composite site of 80 pax as part of the first or second wave? (suggestion from the business representative)
- In the middle:
- Specialty Polymers (filling one full wave because of its size)
- At the end:
- Composite materials (they have the most specificities & critical data)
Constraints
- Approx people per wave = 4000 (not more than 5000)
- Data volume = 3 weeks of pre-staging per wave minimum (i.e. historical data pre-migration)
- First Wave preferably smaller (either in amount of user/data, and/or in complexity)
- Ex: users with special characters in the documents names or email titles typically generate more migration errors
- Shared resources wave:
- Watchpoint on integrated mailboxes that have to be reconfigured during the cutover weekend
- Shared drives renaming will be frozen from beg. of April until their migration mid June
- Specific to Organizations:
- GBS & related functions, especially Financen= not at the end of a month (closing)
- Requirement from GBS LT: Finance, HR & Procurement BSA's should be in the GBS Wave
Impacts
- Mixed use of GWS and M365 across organization ("coexistence").
- Duration: ~4 weeks until shared data is migrated.
- Potential collaboration and communication challenges, mitigated by extensive change management efforts.
- Increased IT support demand.
Options considered
Option 1:
Option 2:
Option 3:
See also
The following section describes relevant documentation:
...




