Production fixed costs (= CNPs + AMOs) are costs incurred for the manufacturing of products that, within certain output or turnover limits, tend to be unaffected by fluctuations in the level of activity. Another term that can be used to refer to a fixed cost is a period cost. This highlights the fact that a fixed cost incurred according to the time elapsed, rather than to the level of activity. Standards are set at attainable levels which assume efficient levels of operation, but which include allowances for factors such as losses, waste and machine downtime. |
Fixed costs are made up of all costs either managed or contracted by the enterprise incurred for the manufacturing of products. They include costs directly managed by the plant but also costs managed by other functions that are necessary for the production process. Costs that are not involved in the production process should not be included (CNP others etc.) |
Production fixed costs are accounted on direct or indirect production cost centers.
They are allocated to finished product cost using machine hours and related hourly rate. These hourly rates are defined once a year. In the course of the year, they should be reviewed only in the event of a major change to the structure or the activity.
Distinction between variable costs (CP) and fixed costs is based on the destination cost centers of the expense (and not on the nature of the expense). Fixed cost centers should be codified as follows (where PPPP stands for the plant code, but can be replaced in some cases by the company code and “x” sequence numbering of cost centers corresponding to the definition.).
Indirect costs and depreciation are allocated to all production costs according to keys that should be as relevant as possible, and validated by the plants director. Costs that are not involved in the production process should not be included (CNP others etc.) |
The “standard fixed cost budget” has to be calculated in a consistent manner with the yearly “normal capacity” |
The estimation has to remain simple, formalized (documentation can be requested by internal / external audit), and in constant manner from one year to the other. Changes from one year to the next one should be driven only by inflation and modifications in the plant costs structure or manufacturing process. |
The standard fixed cost budget and the allocation keys have to be validated by the plant director and the business controller(s) and filled in WP1 following the WP1 procedure (see Manage product costing) |
The “normal capacity” is the total number of machine hours in a year decreased by the number of hours lost because of technical constraints and for which recipe production time doesn’t include any allowance.
It should be based on OEE data:
t1. External causes stoppages: lack of sales, lack of supplies due to suppliers or carriers' failures (material and energy), force majeure, general strike (i.e. not specific to the site like national strike).
t2. Planned Maintenance and annual shutdowns.
t3. Intercampaign changeovers
t4. Breakdowns
t5. Process / Operations: low speed / cycle time not respected, lack of supplies due to internal failures (missing orders, wrong planning…), local strike (i.e. specific to the site or to the workshop)
t6. Quality: scrap, and non-sellable without rework or recycling product
All information on the OEE can be found here
In which cases a bottleneck has to be taken into account in the calculation of the normal capacity?
The normal capacity has to be validated by the plant director and the business controller(s) and filled in WP1 following the WP1 procedure (see Manage product costing) |
Recipe-based costing sub-product absorbs fixed costs because it participated to the justification of:
If not, it is a “manual costing” sub-product: see below the rule for valuation.
They don’t absorb any fixed costs. Their valuation is based on their net realizable value that is the average net selling price decreased by variable selling expenses.
When using WP1, that value is keyed in the field Rules - Material Commercial price of the material master data (transaction MM02 - I change the costing & accounting view - General). Frequency of the up-date of that valuation depends on volatility of the net selling price and the materiality of the revenue.

The list of “manual costing” products is validated in the frame of IAC Internal controls |
It can happen that a production line was definitely stopped. As there are no more costs allocated to this line, it has no sense to calculate a standard cost based on a budget for the remaining inventory.
In this case, it is possible to flag “do not cost” in view “costing1”of the material master data. The material will be valued with the last known costing.
A fixed cost center can allocate up to 3 different natures of expense, depending on the type of activity used:
Hourly rate can be different depending on the activity type, based on cost elements used to enter the standard fixed cost budget but there is only one normal capacity for MACHI and AMO, based on machine time.
Regarding MANHO: for single-product production line and or for production line where staff is fixed regardless of product, reference capacity should be the normal capacity. Otherwise, the number of hours for MANHO rate calculation should be: normal capacity x (last 12 month man hours/last 12 months machine time)
Each cost element is link to a type of activity based on the cost splitting structure table.
Here are cost elements recommended to enter budget for each activity type:
For more detailed budget input, any primary (starting with 98) cost element of the following groups can be used:
The 1st of January, the inventory is re valuated with the new standard cost.
Revaluation = [Standard cost (Y) – Standard cost (Y-1)] x Quantity 01/01/Y (00h00)
Note that the CP portion of that revaluation should be reversed on January 1st and posted on Dec 31st. For entities using WP1, the split between CP, CNP and AMO of the inventory revaluation is available with transaction ZWFA100A - Processing Stock revaluation reverse.
Let’s assume that you have to prepare the costing of two products Alpha ( α ) and Beta ( β ) that can be produced in one production line.
At the end of 2009, using the best information at hand, you compile the following data to use as standards for 2010.
Costing for 2010

Yearly normal capacity is given by production managers based on OEE data and maintenance schedule. |
If the throughput of a production line increases, the production time has to be updated. The standard cost will be automatically up-dated. |
There is no problem to manage multi-product production line as the cost driver is based on time. |
There is no need to forecast the production and the production allocation. |
Production department can use several recipes but only one is used for the costing of the month. |
The previous procedure was referring to net OEE based on the assumption that recipe production time wouldn't include any allowance for inter-campaign changeovers, quality... Today, it appears it is not always the case so we have to adapt the definition, but we keep the same principle of a normal capacity based on existing equipment only limited by technical constraint. If we change from full capacity to normal capacity, it is only to avoid confusion with maximum capacity (24/7) Therefore, there is no change in our accounting method. |
Full absorption costing may be requested by customs authority, or tax authorities when reviewing transfer pricing. For financial reporting, under IFRS, only cost related to production can be included in inventory and cost of sales. |
Yes, at least at the level of the first digit (-1xxx for direct production cost centers and -2xxx for indirect cost centers). |
If the shutdown is postponed to another year, what should we do? We should reverse all accruals related to that maintenance, correct the MACHI rates impacted and book an inventory revaluation. |