|
Analysis of variances
1. Exclusion of company codes
In S3, company codes 5985, 6034, 6235 are excluded |
| S3 | Co$ta |
|---|---|
| 0 M€ | 2 875 273 M€ |
2. Exclusion of Creditor domains
In S3, some creditors are excluded when their domain is: Raw materials, Energy, Out of purchasing scope List of vendors exluded in S3 but kept in Co$ta when material group is in the scope: vendors.xlsx |
For instance the vendor Inovyn is excluded in S3 as its domain is Raw materials but it is kept in Co$ta when the material group of the purchase order is in the scope:
| S3 | Co$ta |
|---|---|
| 0 € | 10 979 953 € |
3. Files manually uploaded
In S3, NonERP data is uploaded and not yet in Co$ta (Only Composite Materials) |
| S3 | Co$ta |
|---|---|
| 5 970 749 € | 0 € |
4. Transport & Log Sves
In Co$ta, Transport & Logistics costs are taken into account when the posting is done in a cost center. It is not significant as the biggest part is posted directly in the P&L and is not taken into account in Co$ta. It is the responsibility of the project Screen to deliver a reliable report on Transport & Logistic costs that will be used by Co$ta. S3 is already reporting Freight & Logistics costs which creates the biggest variance Co$ta vs S3. |
| S3 | Co$ta |
|---|---|
| 60 177 033 € | 8 843 509 € |
5. Car fleet (IFRS16)
In S3, car fleet is not included when there is no purchase order. It is included in Costa. |
| S3 | Co$ta |
|---|---|
| 0 € | 619 211 € |
Conclusion
Once all variances are taken into account, it remains the following variance:
The total is very small (40k€) however there are bigger variances when looking at each GBU. (to be deeper investigated)
