Error example in which costing relevancy is applied In the BOM One component of the BOM was in error while calculating the standard cost estimate for the finished product, in transaction CK11N:
This error happened because the component’s master data (transaction mm03) was not correctly maintained (in this case it was missing the valuation class, which determines the account used):
Since this component was not intended to be considered on the standard cost estimate, the option was to remove the ‘’tick’’ on the costing relevancy indicator. This action does not remove the component from the BOM, but considers the component not relevant for costing, so it will not appear on the standard cost estimate calculation and will cause no error.
In the Routing While displaying a cost estimate in transaction CK13N, it was seen that it was not considering costs with activities, even though it was known that they existed in the routing:
In this case, the action was to access transaction CA22 (change mode) and ‘’tick’’ the costing relevancy activities that should be considered as relevant for costing:
Where to find this indicator In the BOM
3. Double-click on the column item related to the component (material) that you want to display.
4.Go to tab ‘’Status/Lng Text’’ and find the ‘’CostingRelevncy’’ indicator.
In the Routing
2.Double-click on the column relative to the activity that you want to view.
Interpretation
|