* Required information |
Phase |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Status |
| |||
Start Date | Enter the starting date of your initiative, by clicking on the calendar icon bellow - when you started to work on different step of the initiative
| |||
Initiative name ID Provided by DT PMO | 12160 | |||
This is an extension of initiative 11764 Star Tek MVP. Following the success of the MVP, this initiative aims to deploy the use cases from the MVP that have already proven their worth to all Star Factory sites to be deployed in 2023. In parallel, we intend to add to the service offer by develloping new use cases. These use cases will be brought by Business during the Star Factory deployment and respective roadmaps established. This accelerates data intensive projects, optimizes and accelerates deployment of Digital applications such as Eschbach, SeeQ, PI Vision, creating value from day 1. This standardization also contributes to DT providing better service. All applications connected to Star Tek are standard approved applications and all use-cases are easily reproduced in other sites thanks to the standardization. This initiative is closely linked to Star Factory program and takes into account, on its roadmap, other initiatives such as IT infrastructure modernization, Eschbach roll-out, PI Vision (replacing end of life product Process Book) roll-out, MES upgrade, in order to optimize deployment costs and resources from the DT side, as well as from the sites. Estimated budget - 5.5 million euros (includes 43 sites architecture deployment, SeeQ licensing costs for new sites, roll-out of existing use-cases, development of new use cases, study for new data sources to be included and study for the possibility of having a star tek ITAR version) You can find more information about the project and the value it has already created in the presentation here. | ||||
Domain & Product | ||||
Requested Domain Journey / Platform |
| |||
| Involved Domain Journey/ Platform |
| |||
Initiative Ownership | ||||
Digital Technology Partner | ||||
Product Manager / Service Delivery | ||||
Roadmap & Key objectives | ||||
Roadmap |
The roadmap will follow Star Factory's roadmap. | |||
2023 Digital Technology Key objective | Protect & Enhance the Business - deliver digital roadmap | |||
Priority | P1 | |||
Understand: Why is this initiative proposed? What are the consequences if not done? What are the new capabilities expected?
|
|
* Why is this initiative proposed today?
Explain what are the motivations and the expected objective behind this initiative/ what are the consequences if not done?
| The MVP was a success, not only in its value creation for Business but also for the possibilities it opens to accelerate data intensive projects and applications deployments. Star Tek is one of the enablers for Star Factory. |
What are the new capabilities expected?
What will it replace? Is it a new solution or an existing one?
Who are the future users?
Identify the future users (BU, sites...) and population concerned
| All group sites |
What is the number of users impacted?
What about the Business Needs?
What is the value of the initiative?
Financial Business expectation (ROI, benefits, savings,...) + Qualitative Business expectation (business value, market fit, visibility,...)
How does the product / deliverable align with the business goals?
Are there any challenges in developing the product?
How will we measure success?
Please duplicate this template in this folder. Then, for the envision phase, answer to the 7 high-level questions in the "Security Scoring" sheet. These questions will help the SIP team to determine the level of cybersecurity & compliance support you will need. Please contact the team by email: @SIP_team@solvay.com
If not able to answer yet, explain it at the Envision gate and it will be the DTLT to decide if green light or not considering with the high level of uncertainty
Estimated Delivery phase start date*
| Estimated Delivered end Quarter* Q4 2023 |
What is the coherent money to commit on the initiative?*
| 2023 (in K€)* | 2024 (in K€)* | 2025 (in K€) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Estimated size of investment (high level) | 5.5 | 3 |
What is the coherent run and build commit on the initiative?
Only run cost impact - TCO over 10Y will be finalized during the strategize phaseEstimated run costs (estimation high level) - on 10Y (if already known) | Type of savings expected /year for DT (Ex: Contracts, FTE, ...) |
What skills and talents do we need?
Here kind of skills required in order to start to fill the Capacity Planning. If name already available please write the name
CLERC, Romain Bruyere, Florent David GENET Fadi BECHARA Thierno Gueye Natalie Wittick @sebastien ladouce @michele Albiccochi @michael Boucherat |
1.11. Methodology to apply (refer for Accolade)
Do you think if your initiative is compatible with a waterfall approachor with an agile approach?
|
If the initiative will be done in Agile methodology, please contact during the strategize phase Nicolas LOVAGNINI
Understand: How this bring value? Which pain points will it removes? Will it be delivered in Agile or Waterfall?
|
|
Now, we can move on to the Solution space
What is the scope (technical, functional & organizational) / deliverables foreseen?
|
| Mandatory actions * (please contact them together if possible) | ||
|---|---|---|
Description of the action / task | Contact | Document & examples (please make your own copy and insert new link here) |
Contact each relevant pool lead to book resources in the capacity planning tool
| Complete Capacity planning tool | |
Complete Accolade
| Claire Bazin | Complete Accolade |
Review with Enterprise Architect the actual solution answering the objective
| Complete Architecture Impact Analysis (AIA) | |
Check you have confirmed the involvement of each platform | Revert to SDM of each Platform | |
Identify security needs (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability) and define security measures to be implemented by the initiative team
| Complete“SIP Support tool” No changes from the MVP. A particular study with the cybersecurity team will be conducted just to evaluate if an ITAR Star Tek could be done and what it would take. There is a cybersecurity member that is part of the Star Tek core team. | |
Support for budget estimation (via the Workload & Cost), Financial evaluation (Total Cost of Ownership over 10Y), saving validation
| W&C: to be filled in to Accolade in preparation phase TCO over 10Y: | |
| Optional | ||
If any relation needed with a supplier
| For SeeQ, there is a contract negotiation ongoing | |
If it concerns a key supplier, a sourcing strategy has to be defined
| ||
If conformity by design is required
| GMP (pharma), ISO | |
If Data Governance is required: identify the business objects
| Data Governance Strategise for Initiative Briefs There is a team member from the Data Governance team that is part of the Star Tek team | |
What do users dislike about the current solution?
Applicable when a new solution is developed
| Currently there was no communication between the different systems (labware, DCS, SAP, etc) making it very difficult to have all the information in one place, in a reliable way, to make data-driven decisions |
What tools or features do your users wish to have?
What value will it add to the user´s lives?
What alternative do we have?
| There is no current alternative |
What are the risks (refer to Risk analysis matrix in Accolade)?
Are there any internal / external constraints and what are the preventive actions associated?
Identify risks and mitigation plans
What is the qualitative assessment of Hardware/ Data processing/ Project’s contribution to Solvay One Planet?
- Is the business ambition you will support improving or not sustainability? - Will you increase or decrease the number of hardware we need to operate? How much ? - Will you generate or transfer an important amount of data, especially videos? How much? |