Phase |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Status |
| |||
Start Date | Enter the starting date of your initiative, by clicking on the calendar icon bellow - when you started to work on different step of the initiative
| |||
Initiative name ID Provided by DT PMO | Review of Columns/Filters optimization @ Rheinberg & Torrelavega | |||
Description of the initiative | An data-driven optimizer of the columns/filters performances of the Soda Ash process has been put in place in 2020 at Rheinberg and Torrelavega. The efficiency of the optimize is drifting which means that production yield is not optimized anymore. A review of the underlying model is required to get back to the best production rates. Explain the context and the initiative (current situation, linked to other initiative, pre-requisites).summary with key items:
| |||
Domain & Product | ||||
Requested Domain Journey / Platform |
| |||
| Involved Domain Journey/ Platform |
| |||
Initiative Ownership | ||||
Digital Technology Partner | Enter the Digital Technology Partner, using « @ » for user attribution (if not known refer to the DT Playbook in "Relation with GBU & BSA" chapter) | |||
Product Manager / Service Delivery | Enter the Product Manager / Service Delivery Manager, using « @ » for user attribution | |||
Roadmap & Key objectives | ||||
Roadmap | Manufacturing Operations | |||
2023 Digital Technology Key objective | OEE Debottlenecking | |||
Priority | Enter the level of priority of your initiative: P1 must do by day 1/ P2 can do/ P3 parked for now P1 Must Do | |||
Understand: Why is this initiative proposed? What are the consequences if not done? What are the new capabilities expected?
|
|
* Why is this initiative proposed today?
Explain what are the motivations and the expected objective behind this initiative/ what are the consequences if not done?
| The performance of the predictive model is drifting and does not bring the same level of value anymore. A review of the model is required to recover this lost value. |
What are the new capabilities expected?
| More robust model with reviewed technology and techniques. |
What will it replace? Is it a new solution or an existing one?
| Will replace the existing model. |
Who are the future users?
Identify the future users (BU, sites...) and population concerned
| Soda Ash GBU / Rheinberg production site / Production Team |
What is the number of users impacted?
| 5-10 (production engineer + operators) |
What about the Business Needs?
What is the value of the initiative?
Financial Business expectation (ROI, benefits, savings,...) + Qualitative Business expectation (business value, market fit, visibility,...)
Improvement of 1% of the yield taking as a base line from the 8th of July 2021 until 16th of February 2023. From 73.4% to 74.4%. That is 340k€ / year. ROI is approx. 3 months. |
How does the product / deliverable align with the business goals?
| Reduction of variable cost to improve competitiveness. |
Are there any challenges in developing the product?
| Several approaches will be tested to find the best model. There is a risk that none of the solution will bring the expected value. |
How will we measure success?
|
Please duplicate this template in this folder . Then, for the envision phase , answerto the initiative card tab and to the 7 high-level questions in the "Security Scoring" tab. These questions will help the SIP team to determine the level of cybersecurity & compliance support you will need. Please contact the team by email: @ SIP_team@solvay.com
If not able to answer yet, explain it at the Envision gate and it will be the DTLT to decide if green light or not considering with the high level of uncertainty
What is the coherent time to commit on the initiative?*
Estimated Delivery phase start date*
| Estimated Delivered end Quarter* Mid-July 2023 |
What is the coherent money to commit on the initiative?*
| 2023 (in K€)* | 2024 (in K€)* | 2025 (in K€) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Estimated size of investment (high level) | 75 |
What is the coherent run and build commit on the initiative?
Only run cost impact - TCO over 10Y will be finalized during the strategize phase
Estimated run costs (estimation high level) - on 10Y (if already known) No additional run cost | Type of savings expected /year for DT (Ex: Contracts, FTE, ...) No expected saving for DT |
What skills and talents do we need?
Here kind of skills required in order to start to fill the Capacity Planning. If name already available please write the name
|
1.11. Methodology to apply (refer for Accolade)
Do you think if your initiative is compatible with a waterfall approachor with an agile approach?
|
If the initiative will be done in Agile methodology, please contact during the strategize phase Nicolas LOVAGNINI
Understand: How this bring value? Which pain points will it removes? Will it be delivered in Agile or Waterfall?
|
|
Now, we can move on to the Solution space
What is your list of scope if waterfall initiatives (technical, functional & organizational) / deliverables foreseen? What are your list of Epics if Agile initiatives?
|
| Mandatory actions * (please contact them together if possible) | ||
|---|---|---|
Description of the action / task | Contact | Document & examples (please make your own copy and insert new link here) |
Contact each relevant pool lead to book resources in the capacity planning tool
| Complete Capacity planning tool | |
Complete Accolade
| Claire Bazin | Complete Accolade |
Review with Enterprise Architect the actual solution answering the objective
| Complete Architecture Impact Analysis (AIA) | |
Check you have confirmed the involvement of each platform | Revert to SDM of each Platform | |
Identify security needs (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability) and define security measures to be implemented by the initiative team
| Complete the security questionnaire in “ SIP Support tool ” | |
Support for budget estimation (via the Workload & Cost), Financial evaluation (Total Cost of Ownership over 10Y), saving validation
| W&C: to be filled in to Accolade in preparation phase TCO over 10Y: | |
| Optional | ||
If any relation needed with a supplier
| ||
If it concerns a key supplier, a sourcing strategy has to be defined
| ||
If conformity by design is required
| GMP (pharma), ISO | |
If Data Governance is required: identify the business objects
| Data Governance Strategise for Initiative Briefs | |
What do users dislike about the current solution?
Applicable when a new solution is developed
What tools or features do your users wish to have?
What value will it add to the user´s lives?
What alternative do we have?
What are the risks (refer to Risk analysis matrix in Accolade)?
Are there any internal / external constraints and what are the preventive actions associated?
Identify risks and mitigation plans
What is the qualitative assessment of Hardware/ Data processing/ Project’s contribution to Solvay One Planet?
- Is the business ambition you will support improving or not sustainability? - Will you increase or decrease the number of hardware we need to operate? How much ? - Will you generate or transfer an important amount of data, especially videos? How much? |