* Required information |
Phase |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Status |
| |||
Start Date | Enter the starting date of your initiative, by clicking on the calendar icon bellow - when you started to work on different step of the initiative
| |||
Initiative name ID Provided by DT PMO | TEST Automation | |||
Description of the initiative | Today there is no or very little automation for our tests on multiple technologies (SAP, Helix, Software Factory, SalesForce....) . We want to improve and industrialize our maturity with regards to testing and this is why a tool aiming at automating the different tests (NRTs, UAT…) is more than required. Budget around 140K€ for tool implementation and licences (without negociation) 88K€ for transformation at CGI | |||
Domain & Product | ||||
Requested Domain Journey / Platform |
| |||
| Involved Domain Journey/ Platform |
| |||
Initiative Ownership | ||||
Digital Technology Partner | Enter the Digital Technology Partner, using « @ » for user attribution (if not known refer to the DT Playbook in "Relation with GBU & BSA" chapter) @ | |||
Product Manager / Service Delivery | Enter the Product Manager / Service Delivery Manager, using « @ » for user attribution @francois ruffinoni | |||
Roadmap & Key objectives | ||||
Roadmap | Dev, Test and Deploy 2023 Roadmap | |||
2023 Digital Technology Key objective | ||||
Priority | Enter the level of priority of your initiative: P1 must do by day 1/ P2 can do/ P3 parked for now | |||
Understand: Why is this initiative proposed? What are the consequences if not done? What are the new capabilities expected?
|
|
* Why is this initiative proposed today?
Explain what are the motivations and the expected objective behind this initiative/ what are the consequences if not done?
| Our objective is to be able to test better, faster and whenever required without inquiring additional costs. Its implementation will also help to decrease or costs (for instance 65% of savings expected on CGI testing costs) |
What are the new capabilities expected?
| Testing faster and whenever required |
What will it replace? Is it a new solution or an existing one?
| It will replace manual testing done by CGI on NRT only |
Who are the future users?
Identify the future users (BU, sites...) and population concerned
| DT Dev,Test,Deploy, EBS and CGI |
What is the number of users impacted?
| 3.5 |
What about the Business Needs?
What is the value of the initiative?
Financial Business expectation (ROI, benefits, savings,...) + Qualitative Business expectation (business value, market fit, visibility,...)
| 65% savings of CGI testing costs. Better and faster tests |
How does the product / deliverable align with the business goals?
| Business continuity by strenghthening our releases to production |
Are there any challenges in developing the product?
| None |
How will we measure success?
| Costs reduced. More frequent tests. Industrialized process |
Please duplicate this template iand contact the SIP teaùm in order to get your corresponding folder. Then, for the envision phase, answer to the initiative card tab and to the 7 high-level questions in the "Security Scoring" tab. These questions will help the SIP team to determine the level of cybersecurity & compliance support you will need. Please contact the team by email: @SIP_team@solvay.com
If not able to answer yet, explain it at the Envision gate and it will be the DTLT to decide if green light or not considering with the high level of uncertainty
If your initiative is working with data, please select the domain which is impacted:
Estimated Delivery phase start date*
| Estimated Delivered end Quarter* Q3 2023 |
What is the coherent money to commit on the initiative?*
| 2023 (in K€)* | 2024 (in K€)* | 2025 (in K€) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Estimated size of investment (high level) | 85K€ CAPEX + 60 K€ OPEX for the tool. 75K€ for CGI | 60K€ for the tool. 65% savings of CGI → 33k€ | 60K€ for the tool. 65% savings of CGI → 33k€ |
What is the coherent run and build commit on the initiative?
Only run cost impact - TCO over 10Y will be finalized during the strategize phaseEstimated run costs (estimation high level) per year on xxYear (xx= duration of the contract if known) + Type of run cost 90kE + licences | Type of savings expected /year for DT (Ex: Contracts, FTE, ...) CGI testing costs (less FTEs) |
Please add here the required envelop needed to work on the strategize phase - if needed (maximum 40k€) :
What skills and talents do we need?
Here kind of skills required in order to start to fill the Capacity Planning. If name already available please write the name
1.12. Methodology to apply (refer for Accolade)
Do you think if your initiative is compatible with a waterfall approachor with an agile approach?
|
If the initiative will be done in Agile methodology, please contact during the strategize phase Nicolas LOVAGNINI
Understand: How this bring value? Which pain points will it removes? Will it be delivered in Agile or Waterfall?
|
|
Now, we can move on to the Solution space
What is your list of scope if waterfall initiatives (technical, functional & organizational) / deliverables foreseen? What are your list of Epics if Agile initiatives?
| SAP NRTs scripts automated in several sprints |
| Mandatory actions * (please contact them together if possible) | ||
|---|---|---|
Description of the action / task | Contact | Document & examples (please make your own copy and insert new link here) |
Contact each relevant pool lead to book resources in the capacity planning tool
| Complete Capacity planning tool | |
Complete Accolade
| Claire Bazin | Complete Accolade |
Review with Enterprise Architect the actual solution answering the objective
| Complete Architecture Impact Analysis (AIA) | |
Check you have confirmed the involvement of each platform | Revert to SDM of each Platform | |
Identify security needs (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability) and define security measures to be implemented by the initiative team
| Complete the security questionnaire in “SIP Support tool” | |
Support for budget estimation (via the Workload & Cost), Financial evaluation (Total Cost of Ownership over 10Y), saving validation
| W&C: to be filled in to Accolade in preparation phase TCO over 10Y: | |
If Data Governance is required: identify the business objects
| Data Governance Strategise for Initiative Briefs | |
| Optional | ||
If any relation needed with a supplier
| ||
If it concerns a key supplier, a sourcing strategy has to be defined
| ||
If conformity by design is required
| GMP (pharma), ISO | |
What do users dislike about the current solution?
Applicable when a new solution is developed
| Manual and lengthy |
What tools or features do your users wish to have?
| Automated tool |
What value will it add to the user´s lives?
| Faster and industrialize |
What alternative do we have?
| Manual |
What are the risks (refer to Risk analysis matrix in Accolade)?
Are there any internal / external constraints and what are the preventive actions associated?
Identify risks and mitigation plans
What is the qualitative assessment of Hardware/ Data processing/ Project’s contribution to Solvay One Planet?
- Is the business ambition you will support improving or not sustainability? No - Will you increase or decrease the number of hardware we need to operate? How much ? Yes, a few more servers - Will you generate or transfer an important amount of data, especially videos? How much? No |