* Required information |
Phase |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Status |
| |||
Start Date |
| |||
Initiative name ID Provided by DT PMO | not provided yet because need an Envision PB Go | |||
Description of the initiative | Needs description: The background of this project is the end-of-support for several most used run-time by applications that are running on Google App Engine standard first generation. Based on the documentation provided by Google (can be seen here), applications that are running using for example: Java 8, Python 2.7, Python 3.7 among other runtimes, will have end-of-support by the 30th Jan 2024 (the earliest deadline, we still have several other deadlines in 2024 as well). Following the end-of-support for those runtimes, the impact to applications running in GAE standard first gen. will be:
Looking at the above points, basically it means also that this will be the end-of-life of GAE standard first gen. because of it's supported runtime will reach end-of-support by the 30th of Jan 2024. For Solvay, Google identified as many as 125 projects (43 applications). To continue to be able to support those applications, the following actions needs to be taken:
Added value: this project is also addressing security concerns regarding Google App Engine that has constraints regarding the default exposure to the internet. Please see here more information for this project. Budget estimated: the budget will be estimated in the Strategize phase, which will be considered new budget required due to the changes caused by the technology dependency. | |||
Domain & Product | ||||
Requested Domain Journey / Platform |
| |||
| Involved Domain Journey/ Platform |
| |||
Initiative Ownership | ||||
Digital Technology Partner | ||||
Product Manager / Service Delivery | ||||
Roadmap & Key objectives | ||||
Roadmap | ||||
2023 Digital Technology Key objective | ||||
Priority | P1 | |||
Understand: Why is this initiative proposed? What are the consequences if not done? What are the new capabilities expected?
|
|
* Why is this initiative proposed today?
Explain what are the motivations and the expected objective behind this initiative/ what are the consequences if not done?
|
What are the new capabilities expected?
| With Cloud Run, it will solve the main security concerns with GAE which is exposed to internet by default. Cloud Run has the capability to configure the access to intranet. |
What will it replace? Is it a new solution or an existing one?
| Google App Engine standard fist generation. |
Who are the future users?
Identify the future users (BU, sites...) and population concerned
| No impact on users. |
What is the number of users impacted?
| No impact on users. |
What about the Business Needs?
What is the value of the initiative?
Financial Business expectation (ROI, benefits, savings,...) + Qualitative Business expectation (business value, market fit, visibility,...)
| This project is to ensure business continuity with additional value of improving security posture. |
How does the product / deliverable align with the business goals?
| The 45 affected applications are serving GBUs and BSAs which definitely create business impact if those apps can't be supported anymore. |
Are there any challenges in developing the product?
| No major challenge identified except the timing. |
How will we measure success?
| Complexity level were defined here - so success measurement will be performed based on this complexity level. |
Please duplicate this template in this folder. Then, for the envision phase, answerto the initiative card tab and to the 7 high-level questions in the "Security Scoring" tab. These questions will help the SIP team to determine the level of cybersecurity & compliance support you will need. Please contact the team by email: @SIP_team@solvay.com
If not able to answer yet, explain it at the Envision gate and it will be the DTLT to decide if green light or not considering with the high level of uncertainty
| The "Initiative Card" and the "Security Scoring" are fulfilled. Please find here the SIP Tool. |
Estimated Delivery phase start date*
| Estimated Delivered end Quarter* Q4 2023 |
What is the coherent money to commit on the initiative?*
| 2023 (in K€)* | 2024 (in K€)* | 2025 (in K€) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Estimated size of investment (high level) | 100k€ | between 20 k€ and 40 k€ |
What is the coherent run and build commit on the initiative?
Only run cost impact - TCO over 10Y will be finalized during the strategize phaseEstimated run costs (estimation high level) per year on xxYear (xx= duration of the contract if known) + Type of run cost No run costs. | Type of savings expected /year for DT (Ex: Contracts, FTE, ...) |
What skills and talents do we need?
Here kind of skills required in order to start to fill the Capacity Planning. If name already available please write the name
This list will be adjusted in the Strategize phase but here are some assumptions:
|
1.11. Methodology to apply (refer for Accolade)
Do you think if your initiative is compatible with a waterfall approachor with an agile approach?
|
If the initiative will be done in Agile methodology, please contact during the strategize phase Nicolas LOVAGNINI
Understand: How this bring value? Which pain points will it removes? Will it be delivered in Agile or Waterfall?
|
|
Now, we can move on to the Solution space
What is your list of scope if waterfall initiatives (technical, functional & organizational) / deliverables foreseen? What are your list of Epics if Agile initiatives?
EPIC 1: Study and arbitrate 128 projects with each application owner to define Phase 1 & 2 Deliverables
EPIC 2: Quick win actions (decomm projects)
EPIC 3: Rebuild applications
|
| Mandatory actions * (please contact them together if possible) | ||
|---|---|---|
Description of the action / task | Contact | Document & examples (please make your own copy and insert new link here) |
Contact each relevant pool lead to book resources in the capacity planning tool
| Complete Capacity planning tool | |
Complete Accolade
| Claire Bazin | Complete Accolade |
Review with Enterprise Architect the actual solution answering the objective
| Complete Architecture Impact Analysis (AIA) Alexandre Mathé | |
Check you have confirmed the involvement of each platform | Revert to SDM of each Platform | |
Identify security needs (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability) and define security measures to be implemented by the initiative team
| Complete the security questionnaire in “SIP Support tool” The questionnaire applied only for EPIC 3 - Vendohm rebuild | |
Support for budget estimation (via the Workload & Cost), Financial evaluation (Total Cost of Ownership over 10Y), saving validation
| W&C: to be filled in to Accolade in preparation phase TCO over 10Y: | |
If Data Governance is required: identify the business objects
| Data Governance Strategise for Initiative Briefs | |
| Optional | ||
If any relation needed with a supplier
| ||
If it concerns a key supplier, a sourcing strategy has to be defined
| ||
If conformity by design is required
| GMP (pharma), ISO | |
What do users dislike about the current solution?
Applicable when a new solution is developed
| N/A |
What tools or features do your users wish to have?
| N/A |
What value will it add to the user´s lives?
| Business continuity |
What alternative do we have?
| Keep the current solution but without support provided |
What are the risks (refer to Risk analysis matrix in Accolade)?
Are there any internal / external constraints and what are the preventive actions associated?
Identify risks and mitigation plans
| https://biarritz.solvay.com/Project/Page/getlayout?projectid=12255&layoutid=21 |
What is the qualitative assessment of Hardware/ Data processing/ Project’s contribution to Solvay One Planet?
- Is the business ambition you will support improving or not sustainability? no - Will you increase or decrease the number of hardware we need to operate? How much ? it will increase the number of GCP services required for Cloud Run usage compared with the number of GCP resources with GAE - Will you generate or transfer an important amount of data, especially videos? How much? no |