| Status | |
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders | The persons consulted or otherwise involved in making this decision. Type @ to mention people by name |
Syensqo currently operates on the SAP ECC platform, utilizing the SAP Warehouse Management (WM) solution for its logistics and inventory management processes. SAP WM is serving as the backbone of their warehouse operations for packed items. This includes handling tasks such as goods receipt, putaway, picking, and inventory tracking.
However, looking at the future (transition to SAP S/4HANA), SAP WM becomes obsolete and new possibilities emerge.
With implementing basic SAP Extended Warehouse Management (EWM), Syensqo will have a future proof warehouse management solution in place. Since warehousing is not a during project scoping this scope needs to be defined and possibly limited and prioritised.
Acronym / Term | System | Definition |
SAP Warehouse Management (WM) | ECC | This is the Warehouse Management Solution in ECC which is currently used by Syensqo. |
SAP Stock Room Management | S/4 HANA | This is the new name of the -older- SAP WM solution for S/4HANA. |
SAP Extended Warehouse Management (EWM) | S/4 HANA | This is the new Warehouse Management Solution in S/4 HANA. |
Capture any additional constraints that the chosen alternative (i.e. the decision made) might impose on other parts of the overall design, solution, or processes.
Describe the impact of the decision on processes, infrastructure, other SAP modules or systems, data cleansing and migration, developments, automations, interfaces, in-flight projects, etc.
The decision may translate into business rules which enforce the decision and will require configuration. List these business rules here. For example, "An Outline Agreement cannot be created via the RFQ process. An awarded RFQ can only result in a Purchase Order".
List the options (viable options or alternatives) you considered. These often require a longer explanation with diagrams, or references to other documents (links are best, but attachments are also possible). Use enough detail to adequately explain what you considered so that a project or business stakeholder reviewing this decision will not come back and ask "did you think about...?"; this leads to loss of credibility and questioning of other decisions. This section also helps ensure that you considered enough suitable alternatives rather than just copy/pasting SAP's recommendations.
Decribe the option in sufficient detail for a reader familiar with the subject matter to understand it properly
Decribe the option in sufficient detail for a reader familiar with the subject matter to understand it properly
Decribe the option in sufficient detail for a reader familiar with the subject matter to understand it properly
Decribe the option in sufficient detail for a reader familiar with the subject matter to understand it properly
Strategic Choice: Implementing SAP EWM provides a future-proof solution to support Syensqo’s warehouse management processes. Given the fact that Syensqo's strategic priorities do not center around warehouse management, it is expected that the basic functionalities of SAP EWM will be sufficient.
SAP EWM is a solution which can handle more complex warehouse management processes. However it is recommended for Syensqo to implement a limited scope. Later phases can expand functionality as needed, including advanced features.
Option A | Option B | Option C | Option D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functionality and complexity |
|
|
|
|
| Criterion 2 |
|
|
| |
| Criterion 3 |
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.
