| Status | |
| Owner | Subhrajit Bose |
| Stakeholders | Gabriella Azzari, Antonio Gonzalvez, Bhargavi Narahari, Sascha Wenninger, Daniel Da Vinci, Alex Bechter, Chad Swance, Mathew Fuller |
This document doesn't highlight any problem statement or any issue, rather, the purpose of this document is to showcase all the possible integration points between SAP GTS and S4 HANA suite. And also objectify the purpose of these integrations.
Summarise the recommendation being made for the reader, leaving the pro/con evaluation and exact decision-making process to the subsequent sections.
The reason these integrations are required are primarily to serve various statutory obligations syensqo needs to adhere to in order to perform any cross border trade. All these integrations are SAP standard integrations and as per industry best practices.
It is assumed that GTS for HANA suite will be available to deliver the TO-BE E2E solutions for each of the scenario's/ Integration documented in this KDD.
It is also assumed that there could be changes or modifications within these interfaces based on specific requirements or localizations during detailed design phase.
To be discussed
These integrations might have impact in various functional areas in the feeder system. Some might also lead to major operational changes within business operations depending on the outcome of the Detailed design phase.
The decision may translate into business rules which enforce the decision and will require configuration. List these business rules here. For example, "An Outline Agreement cannot be created via the RFQ process. An awarded RFQ can only result in a Purchase Order".
Overview
Integration between Feeder System and GTS happens due to compliance, customs, preferential and statistical reporting activities.
The following functions in GTS are supported and performed due to these integrations.
Note : All these activities in GTS are statutory and obligatory (except intrastat reporting which can be done via HANA international trade module).
MASTER DATA

All customer, vendor, and material master data, and if applicable, bills of material (BOMs) relevant for preference determination and re-export control, from your feeder system to the SAP GTS system using Remote Function Calls (RFC).
A distinction must be made between the initial data transfer when the SAP GTS system is set up and regular transfers of new or changed data during operation. For the initial data transfer from SAP S/4HANA.
The change pointer creates a connection between change documents and the corresponding message type. When creating or changing a master record, the application program checks whether the change pointer function is activated. If the function is activated, the system saves a change pointer to the database.
For SAP GTS purposes, so-called reduced message types are used. Message types denote the data that can be exchanged between systems in ALE or EDI scenarios, for example, MATMAS for material masters, CREMAS for vendor masters, and DEBMAS for customer masters.

Masters data’s received from external parties
Data Transfer from GTS to Feeder System
Note : It is also estaiblished during our L3 process mapping sessions that the duty rates will also be transferred back to the feeder for product costing purpose. These rates will be included as an costing element (condition type) in the purchase order line item. A new RICEF entry will be create post TO-BE workshop for this requirement.
CUSTOMS EXCHANGE RATES
In selected country’s the exchange rates are required to be updated in the system from their designated financial authorities. These exchanges are required to be periodically updated in the S4 HANA system and a standard SAP supported batch job will update them in GTS.
Failing to update have them correctly updated will create disparity between origin curreny (Invoice currency) and Customs Currency during customs filing ( For imports). This might lead to Show Cause or Penalty from customs authorities.
Some Reference Links are shared below
Germany (offers multiple formats for download): http://www.zoll.de/SiteGlobals/Forms/KursSuche/KurseSuche_Formular_NotierteWaehrung.html;jsessionid=AD1637C99B2440FF0596E59C35C0FF7F
SANCTION PARTY LIST SCREENING (COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT)

Note: If a document is blocked then some activities pertaining to goods movement such as picking/packing and Goods issues is also blocked in the feeder system. This is controlled via incompletion checks in S4 system based on status checks in GTS.
Legal Control and Embargo Checks

NOTE : The integration design remains same for any type legal control (EAR and/or ITAR) only the degree ot checks and type of licenses differ.
E2E Integration for Customs (Export/Imports)
Overview
For Customs Management, you can transfer four categories of feeder system documents to SAP GTS: The replicas of purchasing documents and material documents are referred to as customs declarations in SAP GTS. Inbound deliveries and billing documents can be transferred as both customs declarations and customs shipments.
TO-BE EXPORT PROCESS AT A GLANCE

The following documents will be integrated with GTS to support Export Declaration Process.
Note : These documents recieved from Customs Authorities are also stored in Archive repository for many years (depending on each country's legal requirement , but usually its from 5-15 years).
IMPORT PROCESS
Overview
Unlike Export the import processing has more variations depending on type of import (Duty Paid/Duty Unpaid/ Process Reliefs/Foreign Trade Zone etc) and Customs Territories (US, EU, Non-EU, China, India etc). Each of these flows will also impact the document integration and data exchange between SAP GTS and S4 HANA.
Outline why you selected a position. The best format could be a pro/con table (sample below), but is up to you as the author. You must consider complexity, feasibility, cost/effort to implement, but also ongoing operational impact and cost. You must consider the program principles and explain any deviations in detail. This is probably as important as the decision itself.
Option A | Option B | Option C | Option D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Criterion 2 |
|
|
| |
| Criterion 3 |
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.
