| Status | |
| Owner | Subhrajit Bose |
| Stakeholders | Gabriella Azzari, Antonio Gonzalvez, Bhargavi Narahari, Sascha Wenninger, Daniel Da Vinci, Alex Bechter, Chad Swance, Mathew Fuller |
The currentl GTS in syensqo is heavily used and comprehensive however there are significant GAPS , this KDD also includes some additional recommendations from the GTS architect.
This document has captured the existing integration from current Syensqo business process which will be replicated in the new GTS 4 HANA as well as the new functionalities and integrations recommended as a part of TO-BE.
The newly added functionalities are the following. These functionalities are not in use in the AS-IS GTS landscape.
Please see the matrix below outlining each of the critical interface. Also in the Recommendation
| Document Flow | Business Functions | Existing Functionality | Integration Type | Requirement Type | Alternative | Impact of integration Missing | Recommended By Architect? |
| Sales Document integrated to GTS | Compliance Checks | YES | SAP Standard | Statutory | Manually perform compliance checks against each legal regulation. | Huge Business Risk, Massive operational overhead and expense, increase in order management time. | YES |
| Logistics (Outbound/Inbound Delivery) document integrated to GTS | Complance / Customs | YES | SAP Standard | Statutory | Manually perform compliance checks against each legal regulation. And Manually creating customs declaration document either in GTS or submit to brokers with only business documents. | Huge Business Risk Massive operational overhead Additional Operational expense, increase in order management time, Delay in Customs Filing and risk of goods clearance on time.Additional charges for broker management. | YES |
| Purchase documents Integration with GTS | Compliance/Customs/Preference | YES | SAP Standard | Statutory | Manually perform compliance checks against each legal regulation. And Manually creating customs declaration document either in GTS or submit to brokers with only business documents.As for preference very little alternative is available to be performed within the business hence outsourcing this business function. | Huge Business Risk Massive operational overhead Additional Operational expense, increase in order management time, Delay in Customs Filing and risk of goods clearance on time.Additional charges for broker management. | YES |
| Invoice(Proforma) Integration with GTS | Customs and Preference | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory | Manually perform compliance checks against each legal regulation. And Manually creating customs declaration document either in GTS or submit to brokers with only business documents.As for preference very little alternative is available to be performed within the business hence outsourcing this business function. | Apart from everything above there is serious financial loss as there is risk of loosing preferential duty treatment and values. Incorrect declaration of preferential statement in commercial invoice. | YES |
| Freight order (TM) with GTS | Customs | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory | Business will manually enter these freight related data's in customs declaration before submitting to the authorities. | Incomplete customs declaration, Customs penalty. | YES |
| Identity Based Preference Processing | Preference Management | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory | Business will have to mantain preference information based on worst case scenario. (See Comparison Matrix in the recommendation section, highlighting detailed pro's and con's) | Apart from Business Risk the following Elements will be missing , if this integration is included in the TO-BE Solution.
leveraging more granular data.
| YES |
| Intrastat Reporting using GTS 4 Hana and S4 International Trade | Enterprise Compliance Reporting | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory |
| The following additional Features will be missing (for more details see Intrastat 101 section below)
| YES |
| Use GTS 4 HANA for the customs warehouse flow | Customs | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory | Use Existing solution (integration to external agencies such as MAERSK via control tower). | The following Advantages will be missing if the integration is not available.
| YES |
The reason these integrations are required are primarily to serve various statutory obligations syensqo needs to adhere to in order to perform any cross border trade. All these integrations are SAP standard integrations and as per industry best practices.
Not Applicable
The decision may translate into business rules which enforce the decision and will require configuration. List these business rules here. For example, "An Outline Agreement cannot be created via the RFQ process. An awarded RFQ can only result in a Purchase Order".
Overview
Integration between Feeder System and GTS happens due to compliance, customs, preferential and statistical reporting activities.
The following functions in GTS are supported and performed due to these integrations.
Note : All these activities in GTS are statutory and obligatory (except intrastat reporting which can be done via HANA international trade module).
MASTER DATA (Continuation of AS-IS)

Master Data Transfer Process between S4 HANA and GTS
Masters data’s received from external parties
Data Transfer from GTS to Feeder System
Note : It is also estaiblished during our L3 process mapping sessions that the duty rates will also be transferred back to the feeder for product costing purpose. These rates will be included as an costing element (condition type) in the purchase order line item. A new RICEF entry will be create post TO-BE workshop for this requirement. |
Additional Master Data Integration Requirement
CUSTOMS EXCHANGE RATES
In selected country’s the exchange rates are required to be updated in the system from their designated financial authorities. These exchanges are required to be periodically updated in the S4 HANA system and a standard SAP supported batch job will update them in GTS.
Failing to update have them correctly updated will create disparity between origin curreny (Invoice currency) and Customs Currency during customs filing ( For imports). This might lead to Show Cause or Penalty from customs authorities.
Some Reference Links are shared below
Germany (offers multiple formats for download): http://www.zoll.de/SiteGlobals/Forms/KursSuche/KurseSuche_Formular_NotierteWaehrung.html;jsessionid=AD1637C99B2440FF0596E59C35C0FF7F
Note :Entry Added to Custom Development Register.
SANCTION PARTY LIST SCREENING (COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT)

| Document Types In Scope | Integration Type | Technical |
|---|---|---|
| Sales Orders/Outbound Delivery/Outbound Invoice/Outgoing Payments | Real Time /Syncronous | T-RFC Enabled (Standard SAP Supported) |
| Purchase Orders /Inbound Deliveries | Real Time /Syncronous | T-RFC Enabled (Standard SAP Supported) |
Note: If a document is blocked then some activities pertaining to goods movement such as picking/packing and Goods issues is also blocked in the feeder system. This is controlled via incompletion checks in S4 system based on status checks in GTS. |
Legal Control and Embargo Checks

NOTE : The integration design remains same for any type legal control (EAR and/or ITAR) only the degree ot checks and type of licenses differ. |
E2E Integration for Customs (Export/Imports)
Overview
For Customs Management, you can transfer four categories of feeder system documents to SAP GTS: The replicas of purchasing documents and material documents are referred to as customs declarations in SAP GTS. Inbound deliveries and billing documents can be transferred as both customs declarations and customs shipments.
TO-BE EXPORT PROCESS AT A GLANCE

The following documents will be integrated with GTS to support Export Declaration Process.
Note : These documents recieved from Customs Authorities are also stored in Archive repository for many years (depending on each country's legal requirement , but usually its from 5-15 years). |
IMPORT PROCESS
Overview
Unlike Export the import processing has more variations depending on type of import (Duty Paid/Duty Unpaid/ Process Reliefs/Foreign Trade Zone etc) and Customs Territories (US, EU, Non-EU, China, India etc). Each of these flows will also impact the document integration and data exchange between SAP GTS and S4 HANA.
Import Declaration Prior To Goods Receipt (Duty Paid)
Customs declarations prior to goods receipt let you to declare imports to the customs authorities before you take physical possession of the goods. This lets you start the customs declaration process for the transfer of third-country goods to free circulation directly at the border, for example, and complete it with verification of the declared data after goods receipt. This procedure is needed, for example, to obtain a release from the customs authorities for goods that have arrived at a port or airport and have to be placed into a customs status before transportation further inland is possible.

In this scenario the GTS system creates a replica of the purchasing document and collects the data in an overview. The inbound delivery data can also be used to update the quantities and values in a customs declaration prior to goods receipt, the system collects the purchasing document data in an overview to update the data. The data is updated as soon as you save the inbound delivery in the feeder system. This lets you use the quantity that the supplier has actually shipped in your transaction. From within the overview, you can create a customs declaration and start the communication process with the authorities. The customs duties will be calculated in both the replicated purchasing document and in the customs declaration prior to goods receipt. It does not matter whether your customs declaration contains items from one or more suppliers (consolidation of multiple purchase orders to one import declaration is supported by standard GTS). |
Import Declaration After Goods Receipt (Duty Un-Paid/Bonded Warehouse)
Overview
Special customs procedures, such as customs warehousing and outward processing are some of the scenario's where a material document from feeder system is used to create the import declaration with the customs authorities. In such cases,you have to post the goods receipt directly from the inbound delivery and the inbound delivery must have a purchase order reference.

At Syensqo the following variants will be performed depending on business process and geography.
POSSIBLE ADDITIONS TO SYENSQO TO-BE IMPORTS PROCESS DESIGN (RECOMMENDED) Customs Invoice : Integration of inbound invoice (Inter-Company or Supplier Invoice) to create customs Invoice in GTS. Subject to our TO-BE discussion, this might be an additional element which will created in GTS . The following elements will be accurately updated in import declaration before submitting to the authorities.
|
PREFERENCE PROCESSING
Overview
Preference Processing supports an exporter to meet the legal requirements for preferential customs treatment and document your products as eligible for preferential treatment.Based on this documented eligibility for preferential treatment, the exporter's customers can import these products duty-free or at a reduced rate of import duty, giving the exporter a decisive competitive advantage.

Master Data Integration Requirements (Pre-Requisites)
The following master data elements are transferred from the feeder system to GTS.
| Data Element | Data Source (S4 HANA) | Type Of Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Product Price | Accounting View ( Product Master) | Batch Job based on Change pointers _ SAP Standard |
| Procurement Type | MRP View (Product Master) | Batch Job based on Change pointers _ SAP Standard |
| Bills Of Materials | BOM Master | Batch Job based on Change pointers _ SAP Standard |
| Supplier Master Data | Vendor Master Record | Batch Job based on Change pointers _ SAP Standard |
Process Steps
|
INTRASTAT _SAP S/4 HANA for International Trade and SAP GTS (Integrated Solution)
Introduction
Intrastat is a statistical reporting system used in the European Union (EU) to collect information on the movement of goods between EU member states. It is a means of monitoring and analyzing trade flows within the EU's single market. Intrastat is implemented in each EU member state and requires businesses to provide detailed data on their intra-EU trade activities.
The Intrastat system applies to businesses that exceed certain thresholds for the value of goods dispatched (sales to other EU member states) and the value of goods acquired (purchases from other EU member states). The thresholds vary by country.
Under Intrastat, businesses must report specific details about their cross-border transactions, including the commodity code, value, quantity, and partner country of the goods traded. These details enable national statistical agencies to gather data on intra-EU trade and compile statistics on imports and exports within the EU.
PROCESS FLOW

Integration steps
|
INTRASTAT ARRIVALS
Source Documents from Feeder System (ERP_S4 HANA)
Integration steps
|
INTRASTAT DISPATCHES
Source Documents from Feeder System (ERP_S4 HANA)
Integration Steps
The following SD sales document categories are processed by the Intrastat programs:
The four illustrations below illustrate the system's behavior and the partner's responsibility given different scenarios for Dispatch reporting.
|
ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONALITIES RECOMMENDED ( SUBJECT TO TO_BE WORKSHOP)
There are 2 additional functional elements recommended to Syensqo based on GAP's identified during AS_IS workshops. Both of these 2 functionalities are supported by standard SAP and is available in GTS 4 HANA Business Suite. These 2 functionalities attract additional integration elements with S4 HANA hence it is included in this document.
Problem Statement
As of now, Syensqo experiences major issues with critical data elements such as ' Country of Origin' . Currently this information is mantained at the product level but there are challenges to store accurate COO information based on stock sourcing. There could be multiple origin for the same product or there could additional component utelized in producing the item, and both of these are reason that leads towards incorrect preference calculation. As a result there are significant amount of loss in trade savings.
Overview
identity-based preference processing supports exporters in fulfilling all legal requirements for customs preferences and identifying their goods as eligible for preferential treatment. Users can determine the preference status of production and process orders at an identifier (Batch) level. The application supports preference determination on production and process orders with static bill-of-materials (BoM) based on actual goods consumption.
The difference between IBBP and standard preference functionality is that instead of calculating configurable materials in sales documents, the system calculates process orders or production orders with the actually consumed components and quantities.

NOTE: IDENTIFIER IN IBPP = BATCH MASTER
Integration Elements
SAP TM Integration with GTS
To clear the shipment from Customs, SAP TM also sends the Freight Orders to SAP GTS that undergo the Screening and create Customs Declarations. They are in turn used to do filing with Customs Authorities. Items of Integration in SAP S/4HANA with SAP TM to SAP GTS:
• Master Data Transfer from SAP S/4HANA or SAP ECC to SAP GTS
• Integration of Forwarding Order in SAP TM to SAP GTS Compliance Document
• Integration of Freight Order from SAP TM to SAP GTS Customs Declaration
In terms of SAP TM Documents that integrate with SAP GTS standard out-of-the-box are following:
• Compliance Check for Sanctioned Party Screening on SAP TM Forwarding Order
• Compliance Check for Embargo Screening on SAP TM Forwarding Order • Export Declaration Creation in SAP GTS from SAP TM Freight Order
| Feature and Capabilities | Preference Management GTS (Option A) | Identity based preference processing - GTS 4 HANA (Option B) |
|---|---|---|
Utilize content-based rules of origin to find out which products are eligible for reduced import duty rates. |
Present |
Present |
Collect relevant purchase orders and material documents |
Present |
Present |
| Calculate product origin for products using official trade agreement rules |
Present |
Present |
| Determine preference eligibility using different methods such as sales documents, invoices, and bill of materials |
Present |
Present |
| Automatically generate and manage declarations for customers receiving your products |
Present |
Present |
| Issue and reissue declarations in the event of a change in preferential eligibility |
Present |
Present |
| Integrate with sales and distribution processing in the SAP ERP application and customs management in SAP GTS |
Present |
Present |
| Maximize your preference determination by leveraging more granular data |
Absent |
Present |
| Calculate only the components or raw materials that are used during the production process |
Absent |
Present |
| Achieve a more precise result |
Absent |
Present |
| Conduct preference processing via specific batches |
Absent |
Present |
| Store preference status at the batch level |
Absent |
Present |
| Enable picking directly from eligible batches for customer shipments |
Absent |
Present |
RECOMMENDATION : (OPTION B) IBPP
2. Use GTS CWH Functionality
| Feature and Capability | CWH Solution Using GTS 4 HANA (OPTION A) | Use AS-IS Solution ( OPTION B) |
|---|---|---|
| Goods Movement to/from CWH |
Standard integration to GTS from S4 HANA via PO/Material Document , Sales order. |
Not Managed withing GTS eco system, much rather managed via data transfer to external agent such as maersk. |
| Stock Keeping and Reconcilliation |
Mantained inhouse automatically from each import declaration via closing portions. |
This will not happen automatically based on customs entry, where as this will happen based on confirmation from external clearing agency such as maersk. |
| Audit trail |
Will have complete document flow within Sap Ecosystem (S4 and GTS) |
Will have complete document flow within Sap Ecosystem (S4 and GTS) (Only customs confirmation is done based on confirmation from broker) |
| Operational Expense |
There will no additional operational expenses. |
Interface to the customs broker (such as MAERSK) will take place via middleware such as a contol tower. These interfaces will require additional monitoring hence this will lead to additional operational expenses. |
Recommendation: Based on the evaluation table above using CWH solution with GTS 4 HANA.
lead to add
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.
