| Status | |
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders |
Syensqo currently use Readsoft as an Invoice Management tool and as an OCR scanning tool for Supplier Invoices.
The Invoice Mangement tool handles the processing and approval of Inbound Supplier Invoices - eg who has to approve an Invoice higher price than the PO, or perform a missing GR if required.
The OCR tool handles the scanning into the system of any paper or PDF Invoices.
With the transition to S/4 HANA Private Cloud edition this will need to be reviewed.
The options are
Both these tools have similar functionality and both can handle the OCR scanning and the invoice approval processes.
In addition it is not technically necessary to have one tool provide both functions. Readsoft OCR can be used alongside OpenText as Invoice Management tool.
The recommended option is to
As the recommended SAP option for S/4 HANA Cloud - OpenText/SAP IM for Invoice Processing due to its greater compatibility with S/4 HANA Cloud editions.
replacing Readsoft to ensure smoother implementation and synchronised Upgrades & Patching
All Supplier Invoices have to be processed by hte Invoice Management tool - it validates the invoice data and runs any approvals queries etc for Supplier Invoices before posting htem in the SAP Accounts Payable module for payment..
Invoices flow from suppliers into the Invoice Management tool from a number of sources

All of these processes will need to continue to flow into the Invoice Management Tool (unless they are removed (eg Xerox) regardless of whether Readsoft or OpenText is used.
But the OCR tool that is used for scanning in some areas can be Readsoft or OpenText
So the OCR and Invoice Management Tool decision is two separate decisions, but are connected - which tool should be used for OCR and which for Invoice Management..
The more important decision is the invoice processing - as all invoices that come in will need to go through the processing, but only invoices that are scanned (ie not EDI, Ariba Network, Govt Portal etc) will go through the OCR system.
Supplier invoices coming into Syensqo will need a process to approve invoice in the following scenarios
Users will need a tool in S/4 HANA (essentially a Fiori App) to send invoices for processing and approval and for approving or rejecting the Invoices.
Whilst an increasing number of invoices will be received via interfaces and so not need OCR scanning, there will always be a residual requirement to bring paper and PDF invoices into the after some kind of OCR processing. This should be available to work with the three invoice scanning centres.
No Invoice Management Tool
The volume of invoices that will require some kind of approval will be too high for a purely manual process, so not having any invoicing tool is not practical
Non SAP Tool
A non SAP recommended tool is not viable due to the expected effort to integrate with S/4 HANA.
Different vendor for scanning and Invoice Management
Whilst its technically possible to use a scanning tool from one supplier and an invoicing processing tool from another it does cause issues.
The use of two different systems run by different vendors means there are
In addition OpenText gives both OCR and Invoice Processing as a single licence.
So there would be a cost implication to using Readsoft for OCR and OpenText for Processing.
The Invoice Management tool should be
Local governments can mandate the use if an Invoice Portal for all invoices to be passed through - so the system will need to be compatible with this.
The system should be able to receive inbound invoices from multiple sources - eg Portals, SAP Business Networks, EDI etc
The system should be certified as compatible with S/4 HANA Cloud Private edition.
If the invoices are not processed and approved in a timely fashion then the suppliers of Syensqo may begin to refuse to supply Syensqo and so cause disruption to the business
If the Invoice Management tool cannot reliably receive inbound interfaces from all the inbound processes and networks then invoice payments may be delayed
If the Invoice Management tool is not reliable or does not integrate to SAP smoothly then invoice payments may be delayed.
If the tool is not reliably integrated with S/4 HANA Cloud then errors and lost data could occur causing disruption and delays to payments to suppliers.
All PO related Invoices that have differences outside of tolerance levels will require approval.
Invoice payments on time are tracked and monitored for compliance with local prompt payments standards so timely payment is a requirement.
Local governments can mandate the use if an Invoice Portal for all invoices to be passed through - so the system will need to be compatible with this
The following options were considered
Use one of the tools already recommended by SAP and (where possible) approved or validated for working with S/4 HANA Cloud
Note that currently only OpenText is validated as the preferred tool for S/4 HANA Cloud - but the actual selection of Readsoft or OpenText can be handled at Detailed Design
Use one of the tools already recommended by SAP and (where possible) approved or validated for working with S/4 HANA Cloud
Note that currently only OpenText is validated as the preferred tool for S/4 HANA Cloud - but the actual selection of Readsoft or OpenText can be handled at Detailed Design
Use SAP Readsoft Process Director & OCR | Use SAP OpenText VIM & OpenText OCR | |
|---|---|---|
Invoice Document Functionality MM Invoices FI Invoices DownPayments |
|
|
Non Invoice Documents Assets POs GRs Customer Orders/Payments |
|
|
| Syensqo Knowledge |
|
|
Other Functionality |
Customisable Workflows Reporting tools Code exists inside SAP
|
Customisable Workflows Reporting tools Code exists inside SAP
|
| Syensqo Integration |
|
|
| Adaptation to Cloud |
|
|
| Standard Fiori Apps |
|
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.
