| Status | |
| Owner | Subhrajit Bose |
| Stakeholders | Gabriella Azzari, Antonio Gonzalvez, Bhargavi Narahari, Sascha Wenninger, Daniel Da Vinci, Alex Bechter, Chad Swance, Mathew Fuller |
Syensqo currently uses GTS for a number of compliance related capabilities. Some parts are fit for purpose and used comprehensively while others are not used consistently, have significant gaps or not use at all. This KDD provides the options for
1) Standardize the usage of GTS globally
2) Implement those functional capabilities that are not used today
| Scenario | Business Functions | Existing Functionality | Integration Type | Requirement Type | Recommendation |
Sales Document integrated to GTS | Compliance Checks | Yes | SAP Standard | Statutory | Implement the integration to GTS with master data fixes for Material master Classifications |
| Logistics (Outbound/Inbound Delivery) document integrated to GTS | Compliance / Customs | Yes | SAP Standard | Statutory | Implement the integration to GTS including the waybill and TM integration |
| Purchase documents Integration with GTS | Compliance/Customs/Preference | Yes | SAP Standard | Statutory | Implement the integration to GTS along with the preference management |
| Invoice (Proforma) Integration with GTS | Customs and Preference | No | SAP GTS | Statutory | Implement the integration to GTS |
| Freight order (TM) with GTS | Customs | No | SAP GTS | Statutory | Implement the integration to GTS |
| Identity Based Preference Processing | Preference Management | No | SAP GTS | Statutory | Implement the integration to GTS |
| Intrastat Reporting using GTS 4 Hana and S4 International Trade | Enterprise Compliance Reporting | No | SAP GTS | Statutory | Implement the integration to GTS |
| Use GTS 4 HANA for the customs warehouse flow | Customs | No | SAP GTS | Statutory | Implement the integration to GTS |
This KDD looks at the options for implementing both the activities.
Below table is the current status of the GTS integration in the current system. Green indicates that the process is currently active in GTS and yellow indicate a newer functionality with a potential opportunity to implement as part of ERP rebuild program
There are 2 options considered as part of the KDD
Option 1: Implement the As-Is GTS solution scope
Option 2: Implement the additional GTS solution scope
| Process | Type of Data Object | Documents | Compliance | Customs | Preference | Intrastat | Current Issues |
| Sales | Master Data | Customers | X | X | X | X |
|
| Transactional | Orders | X | X |
| |||
| Transactional | Contracts | X | |||||
| Transactional | Invoice (Proforma) | X |
| ||||
| Transactional | Billing | X | X | ||||
| Purchasing | Master Data | Vendors | X | X | X | X | |
| Master Data | Materials | X | X | X | X |
| |
| Purchase Orders | X | X | X | X |
| ||
| Invoices | X | ||||||
| Logistics | Outbound delivery | X | X |
| |||
| Inbound Delivery | X | X |
| ||||
| Freight Orders | X | X | |||||
| Good Receipt | X | X | |||||
| Production | Master Data | Production BOM's / Recipes | X | ||||
| Finance | Others | FX | X | X | X | X | |
| Tax? | |||||||
| GTS | Others | SPL's and Other integrations | X | X | X | X |
Not Applicable
The decision may translate into business rules which enforce the decision and will require configuration. List these business rules here. For example, "An Outline Agreement cannot be created via the RFQ process. An awarded RFQ can only result in a Purchase Order".
Following are the options considered for the GTS integration
Option 1: Implement the As-Is GTS solution scope
As a part of this option, the As-Is GTS scope is implemented. There are also some small improvements to the existing processes in scope are included in this option, ex: Optimisation of the SPL check algorithm, improving the master data integrations, including country of origin at batch level etc..
Option 2: Implement the additional GTS solution scope
As a part of this option, the new functionality of GTS is evaluated along with the improvements to the existing process. As part of this option, multiple sub options analysis is done.
Following are the new functionality that is to be implemented as part of this option
| Process | Type of Data Object | Documents | Compliance | Customs | Preference | Intrastat | Rational to implement the process in GTS |
| Sales | Transactional | Contracts | X | Transfer Sales Contract to GTS for Compliance Checks | |||
| Transactional | Billing | X | Billing documents will be transferred to GTS for Intrastat Dispatches | ||||
| Purchasing | Transactional | Purchase Orders | X | Purchase orders and MM schedule lines will be transferred to GTS for intrastat Arrivals | |||
| Transactional | Invoices | X | Supplier/Inter-company Invoices (Incoming) will be transferred to GTS to create Customs invoices. These invoices will be refered in order to create the import declarations , that way the customs value will be populated from the invoice and not the preceding purchase orders. | ||||
| Logistics | Transactional | Freight Orders | X | X | Freight Orders will be transferred to GTS for compliance check and Customs processing. Missing process such as screening of carriers or accurate logistics and freight related informations will be transferred to GTS (such as container , seal number, correct weights and volume, carrier information etc) | ||
| Transactional | Good Receipt | X | X |
| |||
| Production | Master | Production BOM's / recipes | X | Introduce identity-based preference processing in GTS 4 HANA. |
| Object | Option 1 - Implement in GTS in S/4 HANA | Option 2 - Continue with the As-Is Process |
|---|---|---|
| Sales Contracts | Early view of the compliance results to manage the Risk | There is a moderate risk that we contract with a customer / customer party who is blacklisted |
| Freight Orders | The carriers are screened for compliance automatically. This will increase the automation and decrease the risk of any manual errors | As a part of the As-Is process, the checks are carried out manually and are error prone. There is also of missing the manual checks and therefore end of paying fines |
| Object | Option 1 - Implement in GTS | Option 2 - Continue with the As-Is Process |
|---|---|---|
Purchasing Invoices | As a part of this option, Supplier/Inter-company Invoices (Incoming) will be transferred to GTS to create Customs invoice. These invoices will be referred to create the import declarations using the invoice value. This will reduce overhead to business and delays to shipment | As a part of the As-Is process, purchasing invoices are not integrated and therefore the customs value is not accurate in GTS. This results in a lot of manual co-ordination and activity to update the customs value The incorrect value on the import declarations, there might be delays the shipment as part of customs inspection |
Freight Order | As part of enabling this integration, freight order will provide all the necessary information for customs clearances such as container, seal number, correct weights and volume, carrier information etc. The customs declaration process therefore can be automated using the data in GTS | Currently all of the shipment information including container, seal number, correct weights and volume, carrier information etc. is added manually in GTS / sending to the brokers to support the customs declaration process This results in a lot of manual co-ordination, additional overhead to business and potentially delays in processing the customs |
Goods Receipts (Detailed Analysis Below) | Implement Customs Warehouse Solution (CWH) in GTS to manage and monitor the stocks in bonded warehouse including all the movements realtime It will be possible to generate customs documents when required. Also for preference batch numbers will be allocated for the quantity received, hence through IBPP solution in GTS 4 HANA, more specific information can be stored at each batch level and transferred back to S4. | Currently the data of the Bonded Warehouse is sent to a third-party ex: Maersk for customs clearance and filing Any data required wrt to stock and movements will have to be requested by the 3rd party. No Real Time visibility. As for preference, currently supplier declarations are requested against purchase order items. Hence there is dispartiy in critical preference related data, such as country of origin. |
Detailed analysis for Goods Receipt integration with GTS
| Feature and Capability | CWH Solution Using GTS 4 HANA (OPTION A) | Use AS-IS Solution (OPTION B) |
|---|---|---|
| Goods Movement to/from CWH |
|
|
| Stock Keeping and Reconciliation |
|
|
| Audit trail |
System of record is Syensqo |
|
| Operational Expense |
|
|
| Object | Option 1 - Implement in GTS | Option 2 - Continue with the As-Is Process |
|---|---|---|
Goods Receipt | ||
Production BOM and Recipe |
| Qualification Criteria | Option 1 - Utilize IBPP in GTS 4 HANA | Option 2 - AS- IS - GTS for PreferencePossi |
|---|---|---|
| Maximize your preference determination by leveraging more granular data | This is possible as preference information, including country of origin will be mantained at batch level. Each component/raw material will have accurate information stored even if the product is multi-sourced. | Not possible, as preference informations are stored at the product level. |
| Calculate only the components or raw materials that are used during the production process | This is because in IBPP production/process order can be integrated with GTS for accurate preference calculation. | Feature not available. |
| Achieve a more precise result | as mentioned aove | Not possible, as preference informations are stored at the product level. |
| Conduct preference processing via specific batches | as mentioned aove | Not possible, as preference informations are stored at the product level. |
| Store preference status at the batch level | as mentioned aove | Not possible, as preference informations are stored at the product level. |
| Enable picking directly from eligible batches for customer shipments | Stock maintained in the system will have accurate preference information at batch level. | Not possible, as preference informations are stored at the product level. |
| Object | Option 1 - Implement in GTS | Option 2 - Continue with the As-Is Process |
|---|---|---|
Billing and Invoices | As a part of this option, the Intrastat can be generated from GTS without any manual interventions. The required master and transactional data is already available in GTS | As part of the As-Is process Intrastat is generated Manually which is cumbersome and an operational overhead |
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.

Overview
Integration between Feeder System and GTS happens due to compliance, customs, preferential and statistical reporting activities.
The following functions in GTS are supported and performed due to these integrations.
Note : All these activities in GTS are statutory and obligatory (except intrastat reporting which can be done via HANA international trade module).
MASTER DATA (Continuation of AS-IS)

Master Data Transfer Process between S4 HANA and GTS
Masters data’s received from external parties
Data Transfer from GTS to Feeder System
Note : It is also estaiblished during our L3 process mapping sessions that the duty rates will also be transferred back to the feeder for product costing purpose. These rates will be included as an costing element (condition type) in the purchase order line item. A new RICEF entry will be create post TO-BE workshop for this requirement. |
Additional Master Data Integration Requirement
CUSTOMS EXCHANGE RATES
In selected country’s the exchange rates are required to be updated in the system from their designated financial authorities. These exchanges are required to be periodically updated in the S4 HANA system and a standard SAP supported batch job will update them in GTS.
Failing to update have them correctly updated will create disparity between origin curreny (Invoice currency) and Customs Currency during customs filing ( For imports). This might lead to Show Cause or Penalty from customs authorities.
Some Reference Links are shared below
Germany (offers multiple formats for download): http://www.zoll.de/SiteGlobals/Forms/KursSuche/KurseSuche_Formular_NotierteWaehrung.html;jsessionid=AD1637C99B2440FF0596E59C35C0FF7F
Note :Entry Added to Custom Development Register.
SANCTION PARTY LIST SCREENING (COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT)

| Document Types In Scope | Integration Type | Technical |
|---|---|---|
| Sales Orders/Outbound Delivery/Outbound Invoice/Outgoing Payments | Real Time /Syncronous | T-RFC Enabled (Standard SAP Supported) |
| Purchase Orders /Inbound Deliveries | Real Time /Syncronous | T-RFC Enabled (Standard SAP Supported) |
Note: If a document is blocked then some activities pertaining to goods movement such as picking/packing and Goods issues is also blocked in the feeder system. This is controlled via incompletion checks in S4 system based on status checks in GTS. |
Legal Control and Embargo Checks

NOTE : The integration design remains same for any type legal control (EAR and/or ITAR) only the degree ot checks and type of licenses differ. |
E2E Integration for Customs (Export/Imports)
Overview
For Customs Management, you can transfer four categories of feeder system documents to SAP GTS: The replicas of purchasing documents and material documents are referred to as customs declarations in SAP GTS. Inbound deliveries and billing documents can be transferred as both customs declarations and customs shipments.
TO-BE EXPORT PROCESS AT A GLANCE

The following documents will be integrated with GTS to support Export Declaration Process.
Note : These documents recieved from Customs Authorities are also stored in Archive repository for many years (depending on each country's legal requirement , but usually its from 5-15 years). |
IMPORT PROCESS
Overview
Unlike Export the import processing has more variations depending on type of import (Duty Paid/Duty Unpaid/ Process Reliefs/Foreign Trade Zone etc) and Customs Territories (US, EU, Non-EU, China, India etc). Each of these flows will also impact the document integration and data exchange between SAP GTS and S4 HANA.
Import Declaration Prior To Goods Receipt (Duty Paid)
Customs declarations prior to goods receipt let you to declare imports to the customs authorities before you take physical possession of the goods. This lets you start the customs declaration process for the transfer of third-country goods to free circulation directly at the border, for example, and complete it with verification of the declared data after goods receipt. This procedure is needed, for example, to obtain a release from the customs authorities for goods that have arrived at a port or airport and have to be placed into a customs status before transportation further inland is possible.

In this scenario the GTS system creates a replica of the purchasing document and collects the data in an overview. The inbound delivery data can also be used to update the quantities and values in a customs declaration prior to goods receipt, the system collects the purchasing document data in an overview to update the data. The data is updated as soon as you save the inbound delivery in the feeder system. This lets you use the quantity that the supplier has actually shipped in your transaction. From within the overview, you can create a customs declaration and start the communication process with the authorities. The customs duties will be calculated in both the replicated purchasing document and in the customs declaration prior to goods receipt. It does not matter whether your customs declaration contains items from one or more suppliers (consolidation of multiple purchase orders to one import declaration is supported by standard GTS). |
Import Declaration After Goods Receipt (Duty Un-Paid/Bonded Warehouse)
Overview
Special customs procedures, such as customs warehousing and outward processing are some of the scenario's where a material document from feeder system is used to create the import declaration with the customs authorities. In such cases,you have to post the goods receipt directly from the inbound delivery and the inbound delivery must have a purchase order reference.

At Syensqo the following variants will be performed depending on business process and geography.
POSSIBLE ADDITIONS TO SYENSQO TO-BE IMPORTS PROCESS DESIGN (RECOMMENDED) Customs Invoice : Integration of inbound invoice (Inter-Company or Supplier Invoice) to create customs Invoice in GTS. Subject to our TO-BE discussion, this might be an additional element which will created in GTS . The following elements will be accurately updated in import declaration before submitting to the authorities.
|
PREFERENCE PROCESSING
Overview
Preference Processing supports an exporter to meet the legal requirements for preferential customs treatment and document your products as eligible for preferential treatment.Based on this documented eligibility for preferential treatment, the exporter's customers can import these products duty-free or at a reduced rate of import duty, giving the exporter a decisive competitive advantage.

Master Data Integration Requirements (Pre-Requisites)
The following master data elements are transferred from the feeder system to GTS.
| Data Element | Data Source (S4 HANA) | Type Of Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Product Price | Accounting View ( Product Master) | Batch Job based on Change pointers _ SAP Standard |
| Procurement Type | MRP View (Product Master) | Batch Job based on Change pointers _ SAP Standard |
| Bills Of Materials | BOM Master | Batch Job based on Change pointers _ SAP Standard |
| Supplier Master Data | Vendor Master Record | Batch Job based on Change pointers _ SAP Standard |
Process Steps
|
INTRASTAT _SAP S/4 HANA for International Trade and SAP GTS (Integrated Solution)
Introduction
Intrastat is a statistical reporting system used in the European Union (EU) to collect information on the movement of goods between EU member states. It is a means of monitoring and analyzing trade flows within the EU's single market. Intrastat is implemented in each EU member state and requires businesses to provide detailed data on their intra-EU trade activities.
The Intrastat system applies to businesses that exceed certain thresholds for the value of goods dispatched (sales to other EU member states) and the value of goods acquired (purchases from other EU member states). The thresholds vary by country.
Under Intrastat, businesses must report specific details about their cross-border transactions, including the commodity code, value, quantity, and partner country of the goods traded. These details enable national statistical agencies to gather data on intra-EU trade and compile statistics on imports and exports within the EU.
PROCESS FLOW

Integration steps
|
INTRASTAT ARRIVALS
Source Documents from Feeder System (ERP_S4 HANA)
Integration steps
|
INTRASTAT DISPATCHES
Source Documents from Feeder System (ERP_S4 HANA)
Integration Steps
The following SD sales document categories are processed by the Intrastat programs:
The four illustrations below illustrate the system's behavior and the partner's responsibility given different scenarios for Dispatch reporting.
|
ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONALITIES RECOMMENDED ( SUBJECT TO TO_BE WORKSHOP)
There are 2 additional functional elements recommended to Syensqo based on GAP's identified during AS_IS workshops. Both of these 2 functionalities are supported by standard SAP and is available in GTS 4 HANA Business Suite. These 2 functionalities attract additional integration elements with S4 HANA hence it is included in this document.
Problem Statement
As of now, Syensqo experiences major issues with critical data elements such as ' Country of Origin' . Currently this information is mantained at the product level but there are challenges to store accurate COO information based on stock sourcing. There could be multiple origin for the same product or there could additional component utelized in producing the item, and both of these are reason that leads towards incorrect preference calculation. As a result there are significant amount of loss in trade savings.
Overview
identity-based preference processing supports exporters in fulfilling all legal requirements for customs preferences and identifying their goods as eligible for preferential treatment. Users can determine the preference status of production and process orders at an identifier (Batch) level. The application supports preference determination on production and process orders with static bill-of-materials (BoM) based on actual goods consumption.
The difference between IBBP and standard preference functionality is that instead of calculating configurable materials in sales documents, the system calculates process orders or production orders with the actually consumed components and quantities.

NOTE: IDENTIFIER IN IBPP = BATCH MASTER
Integration Elements
SAP TM Integration with GTS
To clear the shipment from Customs, SAP TM also sends the Freight Orders to SAP GTS that undergo the Screening and create Customs Declarations. They are in turn used to do filing with Customs Authorities. Items of Integration in SAP S/4HANA with SAP TM to SAP GTS:
• Master Data Transfer from SAP S/4HANA or SAP ECC to SAP GTS
• Integration of Forwarding Order in SAP TM to SAP GTS Compliance Document
• Integration of Freight Order from SAP TM to SAP GTS Customs Declaration
In terms of SAP TM Documents that integrate with SAP GTS standard out-of-the-box are following:
• Compliance Check for Sanctioned Party Screening on SAP TM Forwarding Order
• Compliance Check for Embargo Screening on SAP TM Forwarding Order • Export Declaration Creation in SAP GTS from SAP TM Freight Order
| Document Flow | Business Functions | Existing Functionality | Integration Type | Requirement Type | Alternative | Impact of integration Missing | Recommended By Architect? |
Sales Document integrated to GTS (Quotatio / Sales Order) | Compliance Checks | YES | SAP Standard | Statutory | Manually perform compliance checks against each legal regulation. | Huge Business Risk, Massive operational overhead and expense, increase in order management time. | YES |
| Logistics (Outbound/Inbound Delivery) document integrated to GTS | Complance / Customs | YES | SAP Standard | Statutory | Manually perform compliance checks against each legal regulation. And Manually creating customs declaration document either in GTS or submit to brokers with only business documents. | Huge Business Risk Massive operational overhead Additional Operational expense, increase in order management time, Delay in Customs Filing and risk of goods clearance on time.Additional charges for broker management. | YES |
| Purchase documents Integration with GTS | Compliance/Customs/Preference | YES | SAP Standard | Statutory | Manually perform compliance checks against each legal regulation. And Manually creating customs declaration document either in GTS or submit to brokers with only business documents.As for preference very little alternative is available to be performed within the business hence outsourcing this business function. | Huge Business Risk Massive operational overhead Additional Operational expense, increase in order management time, Delay in Customs Filing and risk of goods clearance on time.Additional charges for broker management. | YES |
| Invoice(Proforma) Integration with GTS | Customs and Preference | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory | Manually perform compliance checks against each legal regulation. And Manually creating customs declaration document either in GTS or submit to brokers with only business documents.As for preference very little alternative is available to be performed within the business hence outsourcing this business function. | Apart from everything above there is serious financial loss as there is risk of loosing preferential duty treatment and values. Incorrect declaration of preferential statement in commercial invoice. | YES |
| Freight order (TM) with GTS | Customs | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory | Business will manually enter these freight related data's in customs declaration before submitting to the authorities. | Incomplete customs declaration, Customs penalty. | YES |
| Identity Based Preference Processing | Preference Management | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory | Business will have to mantain preference information based on worst case scenario. (See Comparison Matrix in the recommendation section, highlighting detailed pro's and con's) | Apart from Business Risk the following Elements will be missing , if this integration is included in the TO-BE Solution.
leveraging more granular data.
| YES |
| Intrastat Reporting using GTS 4 Hana and S4 International Trade | Enterprise Compliance Reporting | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory |
| The following additional Features will be missing (for more details see Intrastat 101 section below)
| YES |
| Use GTS 4 HANA for the customs warehouse flow | Customs | NO | SAP GTS | Statutory | Use Existing solution (integration to external agencies such as MAERSK via control tower). | The following Advantages will be missing if the integration is not available.
| YES |
| Feature and Capabilities | Preference Management GTS (Option A) | Identity based preference processing - GTS 4 HANA (Option B) |
|---|---|---|
Utilize content-based rules of origin to find out which products are eligible for reduced import duty rates. |
Present |
Present |
Collect relevant purchase orders and material documents |
Present |
Present |
| Calculate product origin for products using official trade agreement rules |
Present |
Present |
| Determine preference eligibility using different methods such as sales documents, invoices, and bill of materials |
Present |
Present |
| Automatically generate and manage declarations for customers receiving your products |
Present |
Present |
| Issue and reissue declarations in the event of a change in preferential eligibility |
Present |
Present |
| Integrate with sales and distribution processing in the SAP ERP application and customs management in SAP GTS |
Present |
Present |
| Maximize your preference determination by leveraging more granular data |
Absent |
Present |
| Calculate only the components or raw materials that are used during the production process |
Absent |
Present |
| Achieve a more precise result |
Absent |
Present |
| Conduct preference processing via specific batches |
Absent |
Present |
| Store preference status at the batch level |
Absent |
Present |
| Enable picking directly from eligible batches for customer shipments |
Absent |
Present |
RECOMMENDATION : (OPTION B) IBPP
2. Use GTS CWH Functionality
Recommendation: Based on the evaluation table above using CWH solution with GTS 4 HANA.
lead to add