| Status | |
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders |
Syensqo's Currently use Readsoft for Invoice processing and this covers two areas of functionality
Situation: With the move to S/4 HANA Private Cloud, this setup needs review to see which tools work best for the future setup.
The recommended option is to
Invoice Management Tool and Invoice approvals
All Supplier Invoices have to be processed by the Invoice Management tool - it validates the invoice data and runs any approvals queries etc for Supplier Invoices before posting them in the SAP Accounts Payable module for payment.
Invoices flow from suppliers into the Invoice Management tool from a number of sources

All of these processes will need to continue to flow into the Invoice Management Tool regardless of whether Readsoft or OpenText is used.
Supplier invoices coming into Syensqo will need a process to approve invoice in the following scenarios
Users will need a tool in S/4 HANA (essentially a Fiori App) to send invoices for processing and approval and for approving/rejecting the Invoices.
OCR Tool
OCR (Optical Character Recognition) is used to scan PDF and paper invoices into the Invoice Management Tool. Whilst an increasing number of invoices will be received via interfaces and so not need OCR scanning, there will always be a residual requirement to bring paper and PDF invoices into the after some kind of OCR processing.
Readsoft and OpenText supply both OCR tools & Invoice Management tools and these can be deployed independently. -eg use Readsoft for OCR and OpenText for Invoice Management. This leads to a more complex system and increased licence costs. So its recommended that the same vendor be used for both. See Assumption section.
The more important decision is the invoice processing - as all invoices that come in will need to go through the processing, but only invoices that are not in digital format (eg paper or PDF) will go through the OCR system.
Options:
1 - No Invoice Approval Tool:
2- Non-SAP 3rd Party Tool:
3- SAP Recommended Tools:
a) Readsoft:
b) OpenText:
Key Points:
OpenText and Readsoft Future developments
OpenText and Readsoft are close competitors and both are credible solutions for Syensqo as an invoicing tool. Currently OpenText is better integrated into the S/4 HANA Cloud architecture and uses Fiori Apps. Readsoft has stated that they are developing the same tools, so we can assume that as a strong competitor Readsoft will match OpenText in this area before go live.
No Invoice Management Tool
The volume of invoices that will require some kind of approval will be too high for a purely manual process, so not having any invoicing tool is not practical
Non SAP Tool
A non SAP recommended tool is not viable due to the expected effort to integrate with S/4 HANA.
Different vendor for scanning and Invoice Management
Whilst its technically possible to use a scanning tool from one supplier and an invoicing processing tool from another it does cause issues.
The use of two different systems run by different vendors means there are
In addition OpenText gives both OCR and Invoice Processing as a single licence.
So there would be a cost implication to using Readsoft for OCR and OpenText for Processing.
The Invoice Management tool should be
Local governments can mandate the use if an Invoice Portal for all invoices to be passed through - so the system will need to be compatible with this.
The system should be able to receive inbound invoices from multiple sources - eg Portals, SAP Business Networks, EDI etc
The system should be certified as compatible with S/4 HANA Cloud Private edition.
If the invoices are not processed, approved and paid in a timely fashion then the suppliers of Syensqo may begin to refuse to supply Syensqo and so cause disruption to the business.
This means that the Invoice Management tool must no have errors or lost data due to
All PO related Invoices that have differences outside of tolerance levels will require approval.
Invoice payments on time are tracked and monitored for compliance with local prompt payments standards so timely payment is a requirement.
Local governments may require all invoices to be processed through an Invoice Portal, necessitating system compatibility with this mandate.
The following options were considered
Use one of the tools already recommended by SAP and (where possible) approved or validated for working with S/4 HANA Cloud
Note that currently only OpenText is validated as the preferred tool for S/4 HANA Cloud - but the actual selection of Readsoft or OpenText can be handled at Detailed Design
Use one of the tools already recommended by SAP and (where possible) approved or validated for working with S/4 HANA Cloud
Note that currently only OpenText is validated as the preferred tool for S/4 HANA Cloud - but the actual selection of Readsoft or OpenText can be handled at Detailed Design
Use SAP Readsoft Process Director & OCR | Use SAP OpenText VIM & OpenText OCR | |
|---|---|---|
Invoice Document Functionality MM Invoices FI Invoices DownPayments |
|
|
Non Invoice Documents Minor issue as not used by Syqensqo Assets POs GRs Customer Orders/Payments |
|
|
| Syensqo Knowledge |
|
|
Other Functionality |
Customisable Workflows Reporting tools Code exists inside SAP
|
Customisable Workflows Reporting tools Code exists inside SAP
|
| Syensqo Integration |
|
|
| Adaptation to Cloud | Note - We expect Readsoft to "catch-up" with OpenText in terms of Cloud integration and Fiori Apps
|
|
| Standard Fiori Apps |
| |
| Licence Costs |
|
Calculation Cost per 1,000 Invoices is 92 EUR per month 468,000 Invoice x 92 x 12 = 516,672 25% discount = 387,504 |
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.
