| Status | |
|---|---|
| Owner | Maytingsari Tjahjo |
| Stakeholders | The business stakeholders involved in making, reviewing, and endorsing this decision. Type @ to mention people by name |
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to migrate the balance of Capex WBS from legacy system to S/4HANA.
All the financial transactions posted of all open WBS Elements as at 30 June 2028 (for Go live 1 July 2028) and as at 31 Dec 2028 (for Go live 1 Jan 2029) in the source systems (PF2 and WP2). All these transactions will be totaled into the one single value and then be posted to the relevant WBS Elements in S/4HANA. The approach will also run SAP settlement to the relevant Asset Under Construction.
The scope of this document covers the approach for converting active Capex WBS element from Legacy Source Systems into S/4HANA.
All the relevant WBS Elements (after applying the approved relevancy rules) open as at end of last month before go live that have received primary and secondary transactions posted to the cost elements within the WBS Elements
The scope of this document will therefore extract the settlement transactions from each individual WBS Element to provide a base for posting to the S/4HANA WBS Elements as at end of last month before go live. The total of the transactions will be used to compare to the balance in the Asset Under Construction that is used for settlement. The total of the settlement transactions will also be reconciled against the total costs posted to the WBS Element to ensure that all costs have been captured. Therefore, the scope will extend to the reconciliation of the legacy Asset Under Construction values
Below are the list of AUC classes for SyWay:
The data from legacy system includes:
The data from legacy system excludes:
| Source | Scope | Source Approx No. of Records | Target System | Target Approx No. of Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legacy systems | Project level exclusions based on following relevancy rules:
| S/4HANA | ||
| Legacy systems |
Exceptions:
| |||
| DCT | Where legal entities do not use SAP to record their projects, the DCT will be used to collect the WBS element data. This will be used in conjunction with the PPM Item DCT to collect Projects that are not in legacy systems. There will be a creation of one WBS element to one Project Definition. | TBC | S/4HANA | TBC |
PF2 and WP2 | Extraction of the Sender Credit values from settlement that uses primary cost elements for settlement (Table COSP) | ??? | S/4HANA | |
PF2 and WP2 | Extraction of the Sender Credit values from settlement that uses secondary cost elements for settlement (Table COSS) | ??? | S/4HANA |
N/A
N/A
N/A
Specify any special requirements or considerations that may impact the data conversion process based on specific locations, regulatory compliance or system limitations. Clearly outline any regional or localization requirements such as country-specific data formats, legal reporting obligations or industry standards that must be adhered to (e.g., localization rules for countries like China).
If the data conversion involves third-party systems or external data sources, such as Icertis, describe any additional requirements related to data mapping, transformation logic, validation rules or security measures that must be followed.
There are two types of costs in the WBS Elements:
There is no need to replicate the postings that have occurred in the source system. The value that has been settled to the receiver object can be used to post with a selected General Ledger account. The settlement can then also use this account to clear the balance at the level. The offset General Ledger account will still be used to balance the journal entries.
The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.
| Table | Field | Data Element | Field Description | Data Type | Length | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARA | MATNR | MATNR | Material Number | CHAR | 18 | Mandatory |
All data cleansing should take place in the data source system as defined in this document, unless system limitations prevent it.
There will be cleansing required outside of that handled in the following DCA’s
| ID | Criticality | Error Message/Report Description | Rule | Output | Source System |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:
Summarize High-Level Process. Include diagrams, where applicable. Include information supporting details of Extract, Transform and Load specific to the Data Object

Extract data from a source into Syniti Migrate. There are 2 possibilities:
The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads
| Req # | Requirement Description | Team Responsible | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Extract data from source systems based on the current relevancy rules that apply to the Project and WBS Element Master Data. For each relevant WBS Element extract the object number from source systems with WBS Elements from table PRPS. | Data team | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. | The following tables will be used to extract the settlement data:
To ensure that all costs have been collected via these tables (COSP & COSS), run a report (transaction code CJI3) to extract all the costs posted to the WBS Element/s to reconcile against the totals extracted from table COSP & COSS. Compare and agree the reconciliation values before progressing further to the next steps. For each open Project, confirm that the final balance is zero which will ensure that the settlement costs represent all the postings (debit and credit) within the Project by WBS Element. Extract the transactions by business transaction type. Use table AUFK to reconcile the settlement costs against actual posting extracts (extract by year by period by settlement transaction for each Project. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. | Go to source systems (PF2 and WP2) Primary Costs Total (Table COSP)
Go to source system (PF2 and WP2) Secondary Costs Total (Table COSS)
From the above, system will generate report as below. The report will need to be summarized by object number by total for all the fiscal years.
| Data team | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Selection Ref Screen | Parameter Name | Selection Type | Requirement | Value to be entered/set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A |
This data collection template will be used to collect WBS element master data relating to project master data that is not in SAP PF2 & WP2.
Target Ready Data Collection Template will be created for Data Object data with exception of some fields which require transformation as mentioned in the transformation rule.<Object> DCT Rules
List the steps that need to occur before extraction can commence
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | All WBS element cleansing has been completed in PF2 and WP2 | Business |
The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow Syniti Migrate to make the data Target ready:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Go to Process Area Launch and open the object 9031. | Data |
| 2. | Execute the transformation to prepare the target tables of PRPS, PRHI, and COBRB | Data |
| 3. | Check and confirm the transformed tables of PRPS, PRHI, and COBRB | Data |
| 4. | Collect all the data to be migrated as a preload validation extract | Data |
| 5. | Validate the Pre-Load extraction | Business |
Transformation Rules
| Rule # | Source system | Source Table | Source Field | Source Description | Target System | Target Table | Target Field | Target Description | Transformation Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | S/4HANA | ACDOCA | RBUKRS | Company Code | Company Code Mapping Table | ||||
| 2. | S/4HANA | ACDOCA | AWREF | Reference Document Number | |||||
| 3. | S/4HANA | BSEG | XREF3 | Reference key for line item | Populated with AUC RECON | ||||
| 4. | S/4HANA | ACDOCA | DOCLN | Line Item Number | Group by If the number of line items exceeds the number of lines per Journal in the "Lines per Journal" rule then it will be split into another document. Where there are more than the specified number of lines to post the entire Project Actuals then the last balancing line of the journal will be posted against the offset account 499000 (Clearing account) | ||||
| 5. | S/4HANA | ACDOCA | RACCT | G/L Account | Default account (715000). TBC | ||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | GKONT | Offsetting Account | For the AUC transformation default to 294999 'For the non-AUC transformation default to 839110. However, because the DMC load tool doesn't support having a cost object on offset line, this posting will need to be split into two documents using 499000 as the clearing account. | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | BLART | Document Type | Default (UE) | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | BUDAT | Posting Date in the document | Posting date will be a variable load parameter. All documents are to be posted on the same day of the calendar year of the last Syensqo fiscal year end | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | BLDAT | Document Date | Default (Same as Posting Date) | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | BKTXT | Header Text | Default (Syensqo Migration) | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | SGTXT | Item Text | Enter legacy PRPS-POSID- WBS Element | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | RWCUR | Transaction Currency | Always local currency | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | WSL | Amount |
Note: Configuration will determine the total amount per document. If a document exceeds the allowed amount then reduce the "lines per journal" by 10% until the value is below the allowed amount. If a line item exceeds "99999,999,999.99" then it must be split into multiple lines | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | HSL | LC Amount | Default (Same as WRBTR) Note: Configuration will determine the total amount per document. If a document exceeds the allowed amount then reduce the "lines per journal" by 10% until the value is below the allowed amount. If a line item exceeds "99999,999,999.99" then it must be split into multiple lines | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | KSL | Group Amount | Group currency is EUR | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | RASSC | Company ID of Trading Partner | - | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | ZUONR | Assignment Number | Concatenate legacy company code and main asset number adding a full stop "." in between each field • BUKRS - Company Code • ANLN1 - Main Asset Number | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | RMVCT | Transaction Type | - | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | VALUT | Value Date | - | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | HBKID | Short Key for House Bank | - | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | RCNTR | Cost Center | - | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | PRCTR | Profit Center | - | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | PS_PSP_PNR | WBS Element | 'WBS mapping table
| |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | AUFNR | Order Number | - | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | MATNR | Material Number | - | |||||
| S/4HANA | ACDOCA | WORK_ITEM_ID | Work Item ID | - |
| Mapping Table Name | Mapping Table Description |
|---|---|
WBS Element/Project Definition | Legacy WBS Element will be mapped to the new S/4HANA number which has been created from the PPM Item number. |
Project Types | Legacy Project Types to be mapped to new S/4HANA Project Types. |
Company Code | Legacy Company Codes mapped to new S/4HANA Company Codes. |
Plant | Legacy Plant mapped to new S/4HANA Plants. |
Investment Reason | ??? |
Cost Centre | Legacy Cost Centers mapped to new S/4HANA Cost Centers. |
Profit Centre | Legacy Profit Centers mapped to new S/4HANA Profit Centers. |
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | All records must be transformed after relevancy rules have been applied. | Data |
| 2. | All cleansing reports must have been verified and endorsed. Only clean records will therefore be subject to transformation. | Business |
| 3. | All mapping table values must be verified by the business. | Business |
| 4. | All the fields within the WBS Elements must have the new values configured in S/4HANA | Data/Functional Team |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Verify Counts | Data team to verify the load count is the same as per identified data from WBS Element file. |
Number of WBS Elements per Project Definition | Verify that there is the same number of WBS Elements per Project Definition. |
WBS Element Levels | Check that each WBS Element is at the correct level. |
Verify against table COSP | Run all relevant transactions in table COSP and match the WBS Elements against the Pre-Load report to verify all relevant WBS Elements have been selected. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| Validate | Check that each WBS element has the correct S/4HANA Project Definition code. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| Verify counts | Business to verify the load count is the same as per identified data from WBS Elements relevancy. The report will be the same one used by the Data Team ready for upload. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| Validate | Business to verify that all the data in the load table/file is accurate as per the endorsed transformation rules and mapping. It needs to be 100% accurate. |
To load Project Definition:
See the DCT for PPM Item Load Section. All these relevant Project Definitions will be loaded into the PPM modules as PPM Items. Within SAP there is a special upload file and upload program that will load these Project Definitions into PPM Items.
Once these Project Definitions are loaded into PPM Items there will be a trigger to use the Project Definition Template to post these PPM Items as Project Definitions together with the first two levels of WBS Elements in S/4HANA SAP Project Systems.
Then we will use the BAPI below to map the legacy WBS Elements to the correct level two WBS Element. The assumption here is that by cutover all WBS Elements will be created in the following manner thus making it easier to map to the correct WBS Element.
The load process includes:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | ||
| 2. | ||
| 3. | Data | |
| 4. | Data | |
| 5. | Data | |
| 6. | Data | |
| 7. | ||
| 8. | ||
| 9. | ||
| 10. | ||
| 11. | ||
| 12. | ||
Load Phase and Dependencies
Identify the phase as to “when” the load for this object will occur. <Pre-Cutover, Cutover, Post Cutover> and list the steps that need to occur before the load can commence
List the Configurations required before loading can commence
| Item # | Configuration Item |
|---|---|
| Object # | Preceding Object Conversion Approach |
|---|---|
| list the exact title of the conversion object of only the immediate predecessor – this will then confirm the DDD (Data Dependency Diagram) | |
The table below depicts some possible system errors for this data object during data load. All data load error is to be logged as defect and managed within the Defect Management
| Error Type | Error Description | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
Any additional key assumptions.
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.