| Status | |
|---|---|
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders | The business stakeholders involved in making, reviewing, and endorsing this decision. Type @ to mention people by name |
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create Service Master records in S/4HANA. It follows the Procurement Master Data Design Standard and is based on data being migrated from legacy SAP ECC systems (PF2, WP2) into SAP S/4HANA.
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to upload data in S/4 HANA.
---CHECKLIST---
--- Additional topics to check---
Current Usage and Setup in Legacy Systems:
In the legacy SAP ECC systems (PF2 and WP2), Service Master records are maintained primarily to support procurement processes involving services. However, the level of data quality and consistency varies across systems. In some cases, key fields such as Service Descriptions, Units of Measure, or Valuation Classes may be incomplete or non-standardized. Additionally, the linkage between services and associated purchasing conditions is often loosely maintained or inconsistently applied.
Target Representation in SAP S/4HANA:
In S/4HANA, Service Master data will be created in alignment with the Procurement Master Data Design Standard. The objective is to ensure that services are structured, clean, and standardized across the entire enterprise. This includes enforcing harmonized naming conventions, classification, and valuation data to support downstream procurement and analytics processes. Where applicable, service hierarchies and pricing conditions will also be defined to enable integrated procurement planning and execution.
Additional Relevant Information:
Service Master records in S/4HANA will be loaded using the SAP Migration Cockpit, based on validated and cleansed legacy extracts.
Redundant or obsolete service entries will be excluded as part of the cleansing process.
Each service entry will be reviewed and approved by the business before final load.
The mapping of legacy keys to S/4-compatible structures (e.g., Service Type, Material Group) will be maintained for traceability.
The data from legacy system includes:
Service records marked as relevant for purchasing processes
Entries with valid service numbers and active status
Records linked to active cost centers or purchasing groups
Service descriptions maintained in English
The data from legacy system excludes:
Obsolete or blocked service records
Entries with missing mandatory fields (e.g., Unit of Measure, Valuation Class)
Test or dummy records (e.g., codes starting with “ZZZ”)
Services not linked to any purchasing documents or usage history
Duplicate entries identified through harmonization process
| Source | Scope | Source Approx No. of Records | Target System | Target Approx No. of Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PF2 | The Purchasing Info Records will be extracted/collected via DCT. An initial extract of the relevant data will be provided in Google Sheet format to assist business in decision making on including any relevant data from Source Systems. Any additional data that need to be created to support the new design may be added in the DCT. A data review and standardization will be done across all Info Records in the DCT. | 38.590 | S4H | 35.000 |
WP2 | 882 | S4H | 880 |
Texts associated with multiple languages can be maintained accordingly, provided they are available in the source system. In case of the existence of a custom language in the source system, this can be migrated only in case the same exist on the targe system, otherwise skip the record.
International Version | Description |
| BG | Bulgarian |
| CS | Czech |
| DE | German |
| EL | Greek |
| EN | English |
| ES | Spanish |
| FR | French |
| IT | Italian |
| JA | Japanese |
| KO | Korean |
| NL | Dutch (Netherlands) |
| PL | Polish |
| PT | Portuguese |
| SK | Slovak |
| ZH | Chinese |
Summarize Document Management requirement, if any
Minor effort is foreseen for some specific countries having specific taxations, the topic is limited to have the tax codes mapping (from Old to New tax code).
Processing Type ETL:
Transformation (T): Syniti will be responsible for cleansing, transforming, and merging the data, as well as updating the staging areas of the SAP Migration Cockpit.
Extraction (E): Data will be extracted from at least two source systems. This activity will be performed by Syniti.
With Functional input, document the technical design of the target fields that are in the scope of this document.
The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.
| Table | Field | Data Element | Field Description | Data Type | Length | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASMD | MANDT | MANDT | Client | CLNT | 3 | Required |
| ASMD | SRV_INTERNAL | ASNUM | Service Number | CHAR | 10 | Required |
| ASMD | LOEKZ | LOEKZ | Deletion Indicator | CHAR | 1 | Optional |
| ASMD | KTGRM | KTGRM | Account Assignment Category | CHAR | 2 | Optional |
| ASMD | MEINS | MEINS | Base Unit of Measure | UNIT | 3 | Required |
| ASMD | BKLAS | BKLAS | Valuation Class | CHAR | 4 | Optional |
| ASMD | PEINH | PEINH | Price Unit | DEC | 5 | Optional |
| ASMD | WAERS | WAERS | Currency Key | CUKY | 5 | Optional |
| ASMDT | MANDT | MANDT | Client | CLNT | 3 | Required |
| ASMDT | SRV_INTERNAL | ASNUM | Service Number | CHAR | 10 | Required |
| ASMDT | SPRAS | SPRAS | Language Key | LANG | 1 | Required |
| ASMDT | KTEXT | ASMD_KTEXT | Short Text | CHAR | 40 | Required |
| ASMDT | MAKTX | MAKTX | Service Description | CHAR | 40 | Optional |
All data cleansing should take place in the data source system as defined in this document, unless system limitations prevent it.
If data cleansing is managed outside of the source system (e.g. Syniti Migrate, 3rd Party Vendor, DCT), the necessary documentation must be produced and appended to this deliverable for sign-off.
| ID | Criticality | Error Message/Report Description | Rule | Output | Source System |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Medium | Remove Duplicated Service Descriptions | Remove duplicates based on Service Description + UoM + Service Group | PF2 / WP2 | |
| 002 | Medium | Validation of Service Group, UoM, and active status in target config | Validate existence of Service Group, UoM, and active status in target config | PF2 / WP2 |
The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:


Extract data from a source into Syniti Migrate. There are 2 possibilities:
The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads
| Req # | Requirement Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| 001 | Do not extract records where ASMD-LVORM = X (record deleted) | Syniti Team |
| 002 | Do not extract records where ASMD-MATKL (Material Group) is set as out of scope | Syniti Team |
| 003 | Do not extract records where ASMD-MLANG (Main Language) is set as out of scope | Syniti Team |
| 004 | Do not extract records where ASMD-BKLAS (Valuation Class) is set as out of scope | Syniti Team |
| 005 | Service Group (ASMD-ASBGR) must exist in customizing table T023 | Syniti Team |
| Selection Ref Screen | Parameter Name | Selection Type | Requirement | Value to be entered/set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
<Object> DCT Rules
| Field Name | Field Description | Rule |
|---|---|---|
List the steps that need to occur before extraction can commence
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow Syniti Migrate to make the data Target ready:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Transformation Rules
| Rule # | Source system | Source Table | Source Field | Source Description | Target System | Target Table | Target Field | Target Description | Transformation Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PF2 & WP2 | ASMD | MATKL | Material Group | S4HANA | ASMD | MATKL | S4/Hana | Create a transformation rule for MATKL by mapping source values to target equivalents using Syniti Migrate |
| 002 | PF2 & WP2 | ASMD | MLANG | Language | S4HANA | ASMD | MLANG | S4/Hana | Create a transformation rule for MLANG by mapping source values to target equivalents using Syniti Migrate. |
| 003 | PF2 & WP2 | ASMD | BKLAS | Valuation Class | S4HANA | ASMD | BKLAS | S4/Hana | Create a transformation rule for BKLAS by mapping source values to target equivalents using Syniti Migrate. |
| 004 | PF2 & WP2 | ASMD | ASBGR | Service Group | S4HANA | ASMD | ASBGR | S4/Hana | Ensure the Service Group (ASMD-ASBGR) exists in the customizing table T023 before migration. |
| Mapping Table Name | Mapping Table Description |
|---|---|
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| Mandatory Fields | Check mandatory fields for completeness |
| Field Format | Validate field formats (text length, data types) |
| Service Group and UOM | Confirm Service Group and UoM exist in target system |
| Duplicated Records | Check for duplicates before load |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
The load process includes:
The loading will be executed using LSMW with the BAPI BAPI_SERVICE_CREATE, as there is no standard object available in the SAP Migration Cockpit for Service Master data.
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Load Phase and Dependencies
Identify the phase as to “when” the load for this object will occur. <Pre-Cutover, Cutover, Post Cutover> and list the steps that need to occur before the load can commence
List the Configurations required before loading can commence
| Item # | Configuration Item |
|---|---|
| Object # | Preceding Object Conversion Approach |
|---|---|
The table below depicts some possible system errors for this data object during data load. All data load error is to be logged as defect and managed within the Defect Management
| Error Type | Error Description | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | Check record count against DCT and load file. |
| Verify random samples in S/4 using transaction AC03. | |
| Ensure data appears in standard search helps (e.g., ML81N). | |
| Log any mismatches or errors for remediation. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
Any additional key assumptions.
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.