| Status | |
|---|---|
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders | The business stakeholders involved in making, reviewing, and endorsing this decision. Type @ to mention people by name |
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create EAM Work Centers in S/4 HANA.
Legacy Work Center is using a diverse range of formats across the different systems. There may be instances where the same Work Centers are duplicated within and across sources, with informal words. This results in data inconsistency. As per SyWay design, EAM Work Centers will be standardized.
The scope of this document covers the approach for converting active Classes from Legacy systems (PF2, WP2) and creation of New Work Centers into S/4 HANA following the SyWay Work Center Master Data Design Standard.
A Work Center is an organizational unit that defines by whom or what a maintenance or production task is performed. The Work Centre has a capacity to do work and the activities performed by them can be costed by setting rates for those activities. A Work Centre can represent either people or machines or both.
Main Work Center
Main Work Centers define the execution and organizational ownership of work management objects such as Notifications, Work Orders and Maintenance Plans within a Maintenance Plant.
They represent the work group team leaders or supervisors who organize and manage the maintenance workforce on a day-to-day basis. This includes coordinating both planned maintenance and unplanned breakdown work and effectively merging the two based on daily priorities and resource availability.
Work Center Category Consideration
Work Centers are distinguished by their Work Center category (e.g. Production Work Center or Maintenance Work Center). The category selected determines which data fields can be maintained in the Work Center master record.
For Plant Maintenance purposes, the default Work Center category will be Maintenance Work Center. However, if the Work Center is intended to represent a machine, the category should be set to "Machine".
Within the Work Center master data, the Work Center category is used to identify it as a Plant Maintenance Work Center. Additionally, a Control Key is maintained to specify the business transactions (i.e. such as scheduling or costing) that are applicable to the Work Center when used in maintenance task lists or maintenance orders.
The data from legacy system includes:
The data from legacy system excludes:
| Source | Scope | Source Approx No. of Records | Target System | Target Approx No. of Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF2, WP2 | Class will be collected via DCT. An initial extract of the relevant work centers will be provided in google sheet format to assist business in decision making on including any relevant classes from PF2 and WP2 as EAM Work Centers. Any additional classes that need to be created to support the new design may be added in the DCT. A review and standardization will be done across all classes in the DCT. Please see an indication of what will be baselined from source systems below and what will be constructed in the DCT. | 4,500 |
EAM Work Center description will be made available in English.
Multi language is supported for EAM Work Center. Login via a different language will have its description displayed in the logon language if the language key is maintained in the Work Center.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
With Functional input, document the technical design of the target fields that are in the scope of this document.
The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.
| Table | Field | Data Element | Field Description | Data Type | Length | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARA | MATNR | MATNR | Material Number | CHAR | 18 | Mandatory |
All data cleansing should take place in the data source system as defined in this document, unless system limitations prevent it.
If data cleansing is managed outside of the source system (e.g. Syniti Migrate, 3rd Party Vendor, DCT), the necessary documentation must be produced and appended to this deliverable for sign-off.
| ID | Criticality | Error Message/Report Description | Rule | Output | Source System |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:
Summarize High-Level Process. Include diagrams, where applicable. Include information supporting details of Extract, Transform and Load specific to the Data Object
Extract data from a source into Syniti Migrate. There are 2 possibilities:
The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads
| Req # | Requirement Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Selection Ref Screen | Parameter Name | Selection Type | Requirement | Value to be entered/set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
<Object> DCT Rules
| Field Name | Field Description | Rule |
|---|---|---|
List the steps that need to occur before extraction can commence
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow Syniti Migrate to make the data Target ready:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Transformation Rules
| Rule # | Source system | Source Table | Source Field | Source Description | Target System | Target Table | Target Field | Target Description | Transformation Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mapping Table Name | Mapping Table Description |
|---|---|
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
The load process includes:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Load Phase and Dependencies
Identify the phase as to “when” the load for this object will occur. <Pre-Cutover, Cutover, Post Cutover> and list the steps that need to occur before the load can commence
List the Configurations required before loading can commence
| Item # | Configuration Item |
|---|---|
| Object # | Preceding Object Conversion Approach |
|---|---|
| list the exact title of the conversion object of only the immediate predecessor – this will then confirm the DDD (Data Dependency Diagram) | |
The table below depicts some possible system errors for this data object during data load. All data load error is to be logged as defect and managed within the Defect Management
| Error Type | Error Description | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
Any additional key assumptions.
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.