| Status | |
|---|---|
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders | The business stakeholders involved in making, reviewing, and endorsing this decision. Type @ to mention people by name |
T
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create 2005 - Material Master MRP views
in S/4 HANA.
Material Master - MRP Views are now used to make some of the Planning activities in both systems (PF2 & WP2). Most of the materials used in the planning process have these views updated, as they contain relevant information about the planning process. The aim is to get the conversion into S4 HANA in a standard way, so it can be used in the new planning processes already defined by the functional team and validated with the business.
While PF2 and WP2 serve as source systems, extensive mapping and transformation logic will be necessary to produce properly formatted load templates in line with the target design.
The data from legacy system may include:
The data from legacy system excludes:
The scope of this document covers the approach for converting active <Data Object> from Legacy Source Systems into S/4HANA following the <Data Object> Master Data Design Standard.
The data from legacy system includes:
The data from legacy system excludes:
| Source | Scope | Source Approx No. of Records | Target System | Target Approx No. of Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Summarize Multi-language Requirement/s, if any
Summarize Document Management requirement, if any
Summarize Legal Requirement/s, if any
Specify any special requirements or considerations that may impact the data conversion process based on specific locations, regulatory compliance or system limitations. Clearly outline any regional or localization requirements such as country-specific data formats, legal reporting obligations or industry standards that must be adhered to (e.g., localization rules for countries like China).
If the data conversion involves third-party systems or external data sources, such as Icertis, describe any additional requirements related to data mapping, transformation logic, validation rules or security measures that must be followed.
With Functional input, document the technical design of the target fields that are in the scope of this document.
The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.
| Table | Field | Data Element | Field Description | Data Type | Length | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARC | AUSME | AUSME | Unit of issue | UNIT | 3 | C |
| MARC | FRTME | FRTME | Production unit | UNIT | 3 | C |
| MARC | MMSTA | MMSTA | Material Status | CHAR | 2 | C |
| MARC | MMSTD | MMSTD | Valid From | DATS | 8 | C |
| MARC | FEVOR | FEVOR | Prodn Supervisor | CHAR | 3 | R |
| MARC | LGPRO | LGPRO | Storage Location | CHAR | 4 | R |
| MARC | SFCPF | CO_PRODPRF | Prod. Sched. Profile | CHAR | 6 | R : Mapping with As Is values and to be values to be provided |
| MARC | MATGR | MATNRGROUP | Mat. Grouping | CHAR | 20 | NU |
| MARC | SERNP | SERAIL | Serial Number Profile | CHAR | 4 | NU |
| MARA | SERLV | SERLV | SerLevel | CHAR | 1 | NU |
| MARC | OCMPF | OCM_GPROFILE | Overall profile | CHAR | 6 | NU |
| MARC | KZKRI | KZKRI | Indicator: Critical part | CHAR | 1 | C |
| MARC | KZECH | KZECH | Batch entry | CHAR | 1 | C |
| MARA | XCHPF | XCHPF | Batch Management Requirement Indicator | CHAR | 1 | C |
| MARC | INSMK | INSMK | Post to Inspection Stock | CHAR | 1 | C |
| MARA | XGCHP | XGCHP | Approved Batch Record Required | CHAR | 1 | NU |
| MARC | XCHPF | XCHPF | Batch Management Requirement Indicator for Plant | CHAR | 1 | C |
| MARC | UNETO | UNETO | Underdel. Tol. | DEC | 3 | C |
| MARC | UEETO | UEETO | Overdeliv. Tol. | DEC | 3 | C |
| MARC | UEETK | UEETK | Indicator: Unlimited Overdelivery Allowed | CHAR | 1 | C |
| MARC | RUEZT | RUEZT | Setup time | DEC | 5 | C |
| MARC | TRANZ | TRANZ | Interoperation | DEC | 5 | C |
| MARC | DZEIT | DZEIT | In-house production time | DEC | 3 | C |
| MARC | BEARZ | BEARZ | Processing time | DEC | 5 | C |
| MARC | BASMG | BASMG | Base quantity | QUAN | 13 | C |
All data cleansing should take place in the data source system as defined in this document, unless system limitations prevent it.
If data cleansing is managed outside of the source system (e.g. Syniti Migrate, 3rd Party Vendor, DCT), the necessary documentation must be produced and appended to this deliverable for sign-off.
| ID | Criticality | Error Message/Report Description | Rule | Output | Source System |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | CNV-01 | Material is not active or is deleted | Materials that are not used for more than 3 years, no subject to migrate | Only active materials during the last 3 years will be migrated | PF2/WP2 |
| 02 | CNV-02 | Material is not an "E" Procurement type | Materials with "E" Procurement needs to have Work Scheduling View | Materials with no "E" procurement are out of scope | PF2/WP2 |
| 03 | CNV-03 | Production Scheduling Profile is missing | Materials with WS View in Material Master must have Production Scheduling Profile | Materials with no Prod. Sched Profile needs to be updated by the business | PF2/WP2 |
| 04 | CNV-04 | Production Supervisor is Missing | Materials with WS view and No Prod Supervisor filled, needs to be checked by the Data Owner | Prod Supervisor has been updated for all relevant materials | PF2/WP2 |
| 05 | CNV-05 | Production Storage Location is missing | Materials with WS view need to have Production Storage location defined | Prod Storage Location needs to be updated for all relevant materials | PF2/WP2 |
| 06 | CNV-06 |
The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:

Extract data from a source into Syniti Migrate. There are 2 possibilities:
The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads
| Req # | Requirement Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Extract from MARC all Material/Plant relevant as Procurement Type E, and be updated as "A" means that the Work Scheduling view is updated | Sinity / Data Team |
2 | Extract data from source system based on relevancy rule | SyWay Data Team |
3 | Google Sheet report pre-populated with PF2 and WP2 information to be generated based on relevancy criteria. | SyWay Data Team |
| 4 | Sinity will extract data and convert it into SQL data base ad share with the team | Sinity team |
| Selection Ref Screen | Parameter Name | Selection Type | Requirement | Value to be entered/set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
<Object> DCT Rules
| Field Name | Field Description | Rule |
|---|---|---|
List the steps that need to occur before extraction can commence
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow Syniti Migrate to make the data Target ready:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
1 | Obtain DCT Sign-off from Business | SyWay S2P Data Team |
2 | <Add steps from Syniti Migrate here> | SyWay S2P Data Team |
3 | Review and Validate Error and Preload Reports | SyWay S2P Data Team |
4 | Generate Load Files | SyWay S2P Data Team |
Transformation Rules
| Rule # | Source system | Source Table | Source Field | Source Description | Target System | Target Table | Target Field | Target Description | Transformation Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PF2/WQ2 | S_MARA | MATNR | Material Number | S/4HANA | S_MARA | MATNR | Material Number | Generate new Material number in Target System and maintain mapping in reference table |
| Mapping Table Name | Mapping Table Description |
|---|---|
Material Type | Mapping of legacy Material Types to target system value |
Material Group | Mapping of legacy Material Groups to target system value |
| Product Hierarchy | Mapping of legacy Product Hierarchies to target system value |
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
1 | Ensure DCT tables completeness | SyWay S2P Data Team |
2 | Value Mappings are according to the latest design - <List of Value Mappings> | SyWay S2P Data Team |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Verify Record Count | SyWay S2P Data Team to verify that the total number of relevant records from the DCT is equal to the total number of records in the Preload and Load Sheets. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Conversion Accuracy | SyWay S2P Data Team to verify that all fields below meet pass the checks:
|
Review Error Reports | Review and correct the errors. Achieve a zero-error record count as much as possible. Raise defects for data remediated and requiring a correction in the source data. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
The load process includes:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
1 | Go to <Load Tool> | SyWay S2P Data Team |
2 | Load 3 records for < > to validate if data is loaded successfully without errors | SyWay S2P Data Team |
3 | Load 3 records for < > to validate if data is loaded successfully without errors | SyWay S2P Data Team |
4 | Proceed with full load if steps 2 and 3 are validated | SyWay S2P Data Team |
5 | Validate few records loaded by accessing standard transactions from S/4HNA eg. MM03 | SyWay S2P Data Team |
6 | Generate post load report if step 5 is validated | SyWay S2P Data Team |
Load Phase and Dependencies
Identify the phase as to “when” the load for this object will occur. <Pre-Cutover, Cutover, Post Cutover> and list the steps that need to occur before the load can commence
List the Configurations required before loading can commence
| Item # | Configuration Item |
|---|---|
| Object # | Preceding Object Conversion Approach |
|---|---|
| list the exact title of the conversion object of only the immediate predecessor – this will then confirm the DDD (Data Dependency Diagram) | |
The table below depicts some possible system errors for this data object during data load. All data load error is to be logged as defect and managed within the Defect Management
| Error Type | Error Description | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
Any additional key assumptions.
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.