| Status | |
|---|---|
| Owner | CASTRO MONCAYO-ext, Jose Luis |
| Stakeholders |
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create 1056 - Resources in S/4 HANA.
Resources are used to identify the production lines, equipment and all the machines related to the production execution process. Resources are the main data to be used to design the Master Recipes for all the Syensqo plants.
The scope of this document covers the approach for converting active 1056- Resources from Legacy Source Systems into S/4HANA following the Resource Master Data Design Standard.
The data from legacy system includes:
The data from legacy system excludes:
| Source | Scope | Source Approx No. of Records | Target System | Target Approx No. of Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PF2, WP2 | Production Versions will be extracted from PF2 and WP2 | 15,000 | S/4 HANA | 15,000 |
| DCT | Production Versions for Plant / Material combination which do not have data existing from PF2 and PF2 | TBD | S/4 HANA | TBD |
English , French, Chinese, Spanish
Summarize Document Management requirement, if any
N/A
N/a
N/a
With Functional input, document the technical design of the target fields that are in the scope of this document.
The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.
| Table | Field | Data Element | Field Description | Data Type | Length | Requirement | MDS Field Mapping in Scope | Field Value in MDS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHRD | OBJTY | CR_OBJTY | Object type | CHAR | 2 | S | In Scope | |
| 2 | CHRD | OBJID | CR_OBJID | Object ID | NUMC | 8 | S | ||
| 3 | CHRD | ARBPL | ARBPL | Work Center | CHAR | 8 | R | TBD | |
| 4 | CHRD | WERKS | WERKS_D | Plant | CHAR | 4 | R | TBD | |
| 5 | CHRD | VERWE | AP_VERWE | Work Center Category | CHAR | 4 | R | 0008 Processing Unit | |
| 6 | CHRD | PLANV | AP_PLANV | Key for task list usage | CHAR | 3 | R | 0008 Master Recipe + Process Order | |
| 7 | CHRD | STAND | AP_STAND | Work center location | CHAR | 10 | C | MFG Execution Config Register | |
| 8 | CHRD | VERAN | AP_VERAN | Person Responsible for the Work Center | CHAR | 3 | C | MFG Execution Config Register | |
| 9 | CHRD | VGWTS | VORGSCHL | Standard Value Key | CHAR | 4 | R | TBD | |
| 10 | CHRD | VGM01 | AP_VGW_MES | Rule for standard value maintenance | CHAR | 1 | C | ||
| 11 | CHRD | VGM02 | AP_VGW_MES | Rule for standard value maintenance | CHAR | 1 | C | ||
| 12 | CHRD | VGM03 | AP_VGW_MES | Rule for standard value maintenance | CHAR | 1 | C | ||
| 13 | CHRD | VGM04 | AP_VGW_MES | Rule for standard value maintenance | CHAR | 1 | C | In Scope | |
| 14 | CHRD | VGM05 | AP_VGW_MES | Rule for standard value maintenance | CHAR | 1 | C | ||
| 15 | CHRD | VGM06 | AP_VGW_MES | Rule for standard value maintenance | CHAR | 1 | C | ||
| 16 | CHRD | ZGR01 | IDZEITGRAD | Key for performance efficiency rate | CHAR | 3 | NU | ||
| 17 | CHRD | ZGR02 | IDZEITGRAD | Key for performance efficiency rate | CHAR | 3 | NU | ||
| 18 | CHRD | ZGR03 | IDZEITGRAD | Key for performance efficiency rate | CHAR | 3 | NU | ||
| 19 | CHRD | ZGR04 | IDZEITGRAD | Key for performance efficiency rate | CHAR | 3 | NU | ||
| 20 | CHRD | ZGR05 | IDZEITGRAD | Key for performance efficiency rate | CHAR | 3 | NU | ||
| 21 | CHRD | ZGR06 | IDZEITGRAD | Key for performance efficiency rate | CHAR | 3 | NU | ||
| 22 | CHRD | PRVBE | PRVBE | Production Supply Area | CHAR | 10 | C | ||
| 23 | CHRD | RGEKZ | RGEKZAP | Indicator: Backflushing | CHAR | 1 | C | ||
| 24 | CHRD | STEUS | STEUS | Control Key | CHAR | 4 | R | ||
| 25 | CHRD | VGE01 | VGWRTEH | Unit of measure for the standard value | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 26 | CHRD | VGE02 | VGWRTEH | Unit of measure for the standard value | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 27 | CHRD | VGE03 | VGWRTEH | Unit of measure for the standard value | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 28 | CHRD | VGE04 | VGWRTEH | Unit of measure for the standard value | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 29 | CHRD | VGE05 | VGWRTEH | Unit of measure for the standard value | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 30 | CHRD | VGE06 | VGWRTEH | Unit of measure for the standard value | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 31 | CHRD | KAPAR | KAPART | Capacity category | CHAR | 3 | C | ||
| 32 | CHRD | KAPNAME | KAPNAME | Capacity name | CHAR | 8 | C | ||
| 33 | CHRD | FORT1 | AP_FORM_T1 | Formula for setup time | CHAR | 6 | NU | TBD | |
| 34 | CHRD | FORT2 | AP_FORM_T2 | Formula for the duration of processing time | CHAR | 6 | NU | TBD | |
| 35 | CHRD | FORT3 | AP_FORM_T3 | Formula for teardown time | CHAR | 6 | NU | TBD | |
| 36 | CHRD | FORTN | AP_FORM_TN | Formula for the duration of other types of int. processing | CHAR | 6 | NU | TBD | |
| 37 | CRTX | OBJTY | CR_OBJTY | Object type | CHAR | 2 | S | ||
| 38 | CRTX | OBJID | CR_OBJID | Object ID | NUMC | 8 | S | ||
| 39 | CRTX | SPRAS | SPRAS | Language | CHAR | 1 | R | ||
| 40 | CRTX | KTEXT | CR_KTEXT | Short description | CHAR | 40 | R | ||
| 41 | CRCA | OBJTY | CR_OBJTY | Object Type | CHAR | 2 | S | ||
| 42 | CRCA | OBJID | CR_OBJID | Object ID | NUMC | 8 | S | ||
| 43 | CRCA | CANUM | CR_CAPNUM | Capacity allocation number | CHAR | 6 | S | TBD | |
| 44 | CRCA | FORK1 | AP_FORM_K1 | Formula for Setup Capacity Requirements | CHAR | 6 | NU | ||
| 45 | CRCA | FORK2 | AP_FORM_K2 | Formula for Processing Capacity Requirements | CHAR | 6 | NU | ||
| 46 | CRCA | FORK3 | AP_FORM_K3 | Formula for Teardown Capacity Requirements | CHAR | 6 | NU | ||
| 47 | CRCA | FORKN | AP_FORM_KN | Formula for Other Capacity Requirements | CHAR | 6 | NU | ||
| 48 | CRCA | KAPID | KAPID | Capacity ID | NUMC | 8 | S | ||
| 49 | KAKT | KAPID | KAPID | Capacity ID | NUMC | 8 | S | ||
| 50 | KAKT | SPRAS | SPRAS | Language | CHAR | 1 | C | ||
| 51 | KAKT | KTEXT | CR_KTEXT | Capacity Text | CHAR | 40 | C | ||
| 52 | CRCO | OBJTY | CR_OBJTY | Object type | CHAR | 2 | S | ||
| 53 | CRCO | OBJID | CR_OBJID | Object ID | NUMC | 8 | S | ||
| 54 | CRCO | LASET | #N/A | Activity Type Set | CHAR | 6 | S | ||
| 55 | CRCO | ENDDA | ENDDATUM | End Date | DATS | 8 | C | ||
| 56 | CRCO | BEGDA | BEGDATUM | Start Date | DATS | 8 | C | ||
| 57 | CRCO | KOKRS | KOKRS | CO Area | CHAR | 4 | R | ||
| 58 | CRCO | KOSTL | KOSTL | Cost Center | CHAR | 10 | R | ||
| 59 | CRCO | LSTAR1 | LSTAR | Activity Type | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 60 | CRCO | LEINH1 | LEINH | Activity Unit | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 61 | CRCO | FORML1 | FORML | Formula key for costing | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 62 | CRCO | LSTAR2 | LSTAR | Activity Type | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 63 | CRCO | LEINH2 | LEINH | Activity Unit | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 64 | CRCO | FORML2 | FORML | Formula key for costing | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 65 | CRCO | LSTAR3 | LSTAR | Activity Type | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 66 | CRCO | LEINH3 | LEINH | Activity Unit | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 67 | CRCO | FORML3 | FORML | Formula key for costing | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 68 | CRCO | LSTAR4 | LSTAR | Activity Type | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 69 | CRCO | LEINH4 | LEINH | Activity Unit | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 70 | CRCO | FORML4 | FORML | Formula key for costing | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 71 | CRCO | LSTAR5 | LSTAR | Activity Type | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 72 | CRCO | LEINH5 | LEINH | Activity Unit | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 73 | CRCO | FORML5 | FORML | Formula key for costing | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 74 | CRCO | LSTAR6 | LSTAR | Activity Type | CHAR | 6 | R | ||
| 75 | CRCO | LEINH6 | LEINH | Activity Unit | UNIT | 3 | C | ||
| 76 | CRCO | FORML6 | FORML | Formula key for costing | CHAR | 6 | R |
All data cleansing should take place in the data source system as defined in this document, unless system limitations prevent it.
If data cleansing is managed outside of the source system (e.g. Syniti Migrate, 3rd Party Vendor, DCT), the necessary documentation must be produced and appended to this deliverable for sign-off.
| ID | Criticality | Error Message/Report Description | Rule | Output | Source System |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1056-1 | C1 | Resource is not used for the last 3 years | All Resources not used for the last 3 years, won't be migrated | Active Resources during the last 3 years | PF2 /WP2 |
| 1056-2 | C1 | Resource is flagged for deletion | All Resources flagged for deletion won't be migrated | Resources with NO flag for deletion | PF2/WP2 |
| 1056-3 | C1 | Resources in Plants that are Out of Scope | Resources created in Plants Out of Scope won't be migrated | Resources valid in Active plants (To Be mapping) | PF2/WP2 |
| 1056-4 | C1 | Resources with No formulas for capacity, scheduling or costing | Resources with missing capacity, Scheduling and costing formulas won't be migrated | Only Resources with all formulas will be migrated | PF2/WP2 |
| 1056-5 | C1 |
The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:

Extract data from a source into Syniti Migrate. There are 2 possibilities:
The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads
| Req # | Requirement Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Extract data from source system based on relevancy rule | SyWay Data Team |
| 2 | Google Sheet report pre-populated with PF2 and WP2 information to be generated based on relevancy criteria. | SyWay Data Team |
| 3 | Sinity will extract data and convert it into SQL data base ad share with the team | Sinity team |
| Selection Ref Screen | Parameter Name | Selection Type | Requirement | Value to be entered/set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
<Object> DCT Rules
| Field Name | Field Description | Rule |
|---|---|---|
List the steps that need to occur before extraction can commence
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow Syniti Migrate to make the data Target ready:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Transformation Rules
| Rule # | Source system | Source Table | Source Field | Source Description | Target System | Target Table | Target Field | Target Description | Transformation Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PF2 | CRHD | ARBPL | Resource ID | S4 HANA | CRHD | ARBPL | Resource ID | Look at the file Resources equivalent for Plant - Resource Name as Existing Plant-New Plant mapping Check Resource name. |
| Mapping Table Name | Mapping Table Description |
|---|---|
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
The load process includes:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Load Phase and Dependencies
Identify the phase as to “when” the load for this object will occur. <Pre-Cutover, Cutover, Post Cutover> and list the steps that need to occur before the load can commence
List the Configurations required before loading can commence
| Item # | Configuration Item |
|---|---|
| Object # | Preceding Object Conversion Approach |
|---|---|
| list the exact title of the conversion object of only the immediate predecessor – this will then confirm the DDD (Data Dependency Diagram) | |
The table below depicts some possible system errors for this data object during data load. All data load error is to be logged as defect and managed within the Defect Management
| Error Type | Error Description | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
Any additional key assumptions.
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.