| Status | In Progress |
|---|---|
| Owner | NADAR-ext, Parvati |
| Stakeholders | The business stakeholders involved in making, reviewing, and endorsing this decision. Type @ to mention people by name |
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create Project Definition (CAPEX, OPEX) in S/4 HANA.
Project Definition is the framework of the Work breakdown structure in SAP. Project Definition holds the default, header information such as Start and end date and scope of the Projects.
As per Syensqo design below are the list of project scenarios.
| CAPITAL/ Operational Expense |
| Operational Expense |
| Statistical Expense |
| Intercompany Recharges |
| Provisional Expense |
As per Syensqo design below are the types of project.
| Project Type | Description |
| 11 | Direct Asset Purchase |
| 12 | Restructuring Provision |
| 13 | Safety and Environment Provision |
| 14 | IAS19 Provision |
| 15 | Intercompany Recharge |
| 16 | Capital Lease |
| 17 | Industrial Projects |
| RI | New Product Introduction |
| RI | Product & Process Improvement |
| RI | Customer and business support |
| RI | OPD Opportunity Development |
| 18 | IT Project |
| 19 | Turnaround Projects |
| 20 | Contingency |
| 21 | Variation |
| 22 | Environmental Fines |
| 23 | Social Fines |
| 24 | Corruption Fines |
| 25 | Waste |
| 26 | Demolition - Recurring |
| 27 | Demolition - Non -Recurring |
| 28 | Marketing |
| 29 | Budgeted Maintenance |
| 30 | Continous Improvement |
| 31 | Operational Performance improvement |
| 32 | Site impact of Strikes |
| 33 | Campaigns |
The scope of this document covers the approach for converting active Project Definition (CAPEX, OPEX) from Legacy Source Systems into S/4HANA following the Master Data Design Standard- Project Definition.
The data from legacy system includes:
All the projects below will be migrated from legacy source systems (PF2 and WP2) into S/4HANA –
Active Capex / Opex Projects,
Closed project that have cost in current year
The data from legacy system excludes:
| Source | Scope | Source Approx No. of Records | Target System | Target Approx No. of Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF2 and WP2 | All Active Capex / Opex Projects, Closed project that have cost in current year | S/4HANA | ||
Summarize Multi-language Requirement/s, if any
As per CNV-1025
Summarize Legal Requirement/s, if any
The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.
| Table | Field | Data Element | Field Description | Data Type | Length | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROJ | PSPID | PS_PSPID | Project definition | CHAR | 24 | Mandatory |
| PROJ | POST1 | PS_POST1 | Description | CHAR | 40 | |
| PROJ | STSPR | PS_STSPR | WBS status profile | CHAR | 8 | |
| PROJ | VERNR | PS_VERNR | No. of Person Resp. | NUM | 8 | |
| PROJ | ASTNR | PS_ASTNR | Applicant no. | CHAR | 25 | |
| PROJ | VBUKR | PS_VBUKR | Company code | CHAR | 4 | |
| PROJ | VKOKR | PS_VKOKR | Controlling area | CHAR | 4 | |
PROJ | PRCTR | PRCTR | Profit Center | CHAR | 10 | |
| PROJ | PWHIE | PS_PWHIE | Project Currency | CHAR | 5 | |
| PROJ | PLFAZ | PS_PLFAZ_CHG | Start date | DATS | 8 | |
| PROJ | PLSEZ | PS_PLSEZ_CHG | Finish date | DATS | 8 | |
| PROJ | WERKS | WERKS_D | Plant | CHAR | 4 | |
PROJ | KALID | FABKL | Factory Calendar | CHAR | 2 | |
| PROJ | PROFL | PROFIDPROJ | Project Profile | CHAR | 7 | |
| PROJ | BPROF | BP_BPROFIL | Budget Profile | CHAR | 6 | |
| PROJ | BESTA | PS_BESTAND | Project stock | CHAR | 1 | |
| PROJ- | XSTAT | PS_XSTAT | Statistical | CHAR | 1 | |
| PROJ | PPROF | BP_PPROFIL | Planning Profile | CHAR | 6 | |
| PROJ | PLINT | PLINT | Integrated Planning | CHAR | 1 | |
| PROJ | FUNC_AREA | FKBER | Functional Area | CHAR | 16 | |
| PROJ | ZLEGACYID | Legacy Project ID | CHAR | |||
All data cleansing should take place in the data source system as defined in this document, unless system limitations prevent it.
If data cleansing is managed outside of the source system (e.g. Syniti Migrate, 3rd Party Vendor, DCT), the necessary documentation must be produced and appended to this deliverable for sign-off.
| ID | Criticality | Error Message/Report Description | Rule | Output | Source System |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:
Summarize High-Level Process. Include diagrams, where applicable. Include information supporting details of Extract, Transform and Load specific to the Data Object
Extract data from a source into Syniti Migrate. There are 2 possibilities:
The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads
| Req # | Requirement Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Selection Ref Screen | Parameter Name | Selection Type | Requirement | Value to be entered/set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
<Object> DCT Rules
| Field Name | Field Description | Rule |
|---|---|---|
List the steps that need to occur before extraction can commence
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow Syniti Migrate to make the data Target ready:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Transformation Rules
| Rule # | Source system | Source Table | Source Field | Source Description | Target System | Target Table | Target Field | Target Description | Transformation Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mapping Table Name | Mapping Table Description |
|---|---|
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
The load process includes:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Load Phase and Dependencies
Identify the phase as to “when” the load for this object will occur. <Pre-Cutover, Cutover, Post Cutover> and list the steps that need to occur before the load can commence
List the Configurations required before loading can commence
| Item # | Configuration Item |
|---|---|
| Object # | Preceding Object Conversion Approach |
|---|---|
| list the exact title of the conversion object of only the immediate predecessor – this will then confirm the DDD (Data Dependency Diagram) | |
The table below depicts some possible system errors for this data object during data load. All data load error is to be logged as defect and managed within the Defect Management
| Error Type | Error Description | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
Any additional key assumptions.
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.