| Status | |
|---|---|
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders |
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create Inspection Methods in S/4HANA.
Inspection Methods are master data objects in SAP Quality Management (QM) that describe how inspections are to be carried out. They specify the procedure, tools, or references to be used for measuring or evaluating inspection characteristics, and can include documents such as test instructions, work instructions, or external references. This feature ensures standardized execution of quality inspections across plants, materials, and processes.
In SAP S/4HANA, the structure and usage of inspection methods remain consistent with SAP ECC. Inspection methods are typically created at the plant level and assigned to master inspection characteristics (MICs) or directly to inspection plan characteristics. Methods may also include language-dependent descriptions, versioning, validity dates, and document references.
In SAP ECC, aside from the standard structure of inspection method master data (method number, version, plant, and description), additional combinations may exist, such as methods assigned to specific catalogs, methods linked to custom documentation, or methods maintained with plant-independent validity. Some legacy ECC systems may also contain methods with non-standard extensions or inactive versions that need to be reviewed and cleansed (pending MDS).
This conversion aims to migrate active and relevant inspection method records from existing ECC systems into S/4HANA by applying the required transformation logic using Syniti as the data migration and transformation platform. The converted records will be loaded into the target S/4HANA system using standard SAP mechanisms such as BAPIs (e.g., BAPI_INSPECTIONMETHOD_CREATE), IDOCs, or direct table loads where applicable, ensuring consistency, compliance, and reusability in quality processes.
The scope of this document covers the approach for converting active 1043 Inspection Methods from Legacy Source Systems into S/4HANA following the Inspection Method Master Data Design Standard.
The data from legacy system includes:
The data from legacy system excludes:
| Source | Scope | Source Approx No. of Records | Target System | Target Approx No. of Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF2/WP2 | Inspection Method will be extracted from PF2 and WP2 | PF2 = records WP2 = records | S/4 HANA | records |
| TBD | ||||
Not applicable
Document Management
None identified. The conversion scope is limited to the migration of Inspection Method object. No document attachments, images, or supporting files are included.
Legal Requirement
Not applicable
Special Requirements
Not applicable
Inspection Method strictly adheres to the Master Data Standard. The complete information of the tables and key fields that hold the Inspection Method information follows the Master Data Standard document.
The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.
| Table | Field | Data Element | Field Description | Data Type | Length | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMTB | WERKS | Q_METH_PLANT | Plant for Inspection Method | CHAR | 4 | Mandatory |
| QMTB | PMTNR | QPMETHODE | Inspection Method (ID) | CHAR (ALPHA) | 8 | Mandatory |
| QMTB | VERSION | QVERSNRPM | Version Number of Inspection Method | CHAR (ALPHA) | 6 | Mandatory (if versioning used; recommended as standard) |
| QMTB | GUELTIGAB | DATUV | Valid-From Date | DATS | 8 | Mandatory |
| QMTB | SORTFELD | QSORTFELD | Search Field (keyword) | CHAR | 40 | Recommended (improves search) |
| QMTB | PRFQL | QPRQUALIF | Inspector Qualification (from TQ11) | CHAR | 5 | Optional (if client uses qualification control) |
| QMTB | QAUTH | QMASTAUTH | Authorization Group (QM basic data) | CHAR | 8 | Optional (depends on security design) |
| QMTB | LSPER | QVERW | “Data Record Is Used” indicator | CHAR | 1 | Optional |
| QMTB | LOEKZ | QLOESCHKZ | Deletion / Status of Master Record | CHAR | 1 | Optional (blank for active) |
| QMTB | AUTOR | QERSTELLER | Created By | CHAR | 12 | Optional (audit) |
| QMTB | DATES | QDATUMERST | Created On | DATS | 8 | Optional (audit) |
| QMTB | AEAUT | QAENDERER | Last Changed By | CHAR | 12 | Optional (audit) |
| QMTB | DATAE | QDATUMAEND | Last Changed On | DATS | 8 | Optional (audit) |
| QMTB | MANDT | MANDT | Client | CLNT | 3 | System (no load mapping) |
| QMTT | WERKS | Q_METH_PLANT | Plant for Inspection Method | CHAR | 4 | Mandatory (matches QMTB) |
| QMTT | PMTNR | QPMETHODE | Inspection Method (ID) | CHAR | 8 | Mandatory (matches QMTB) |
| QMTT | VERSION | QVERSNRPM_TXT | Version Number for Method Text | CHAR | 6 | Mandatory (matches QMTB) |
| QMTT | SPRACHE | SPRAS | Language Key | LANG | 1 | Mandatory (texts are language-dependent) |
| QMTT | GUELTIGAB | DATUV | Valid-From Date | DATS | 8 | Mandatory (text validity) |
| QMTT | KURZTEXT | QKURZTEXT | Short Text (method description) | CHAR | 40 | Mandatory (per language) |
| QMTT | LTEXTKZ | QLTEXTMT | Long Text Exists (flag) | CHAR | 1 | Optional (if you’ll create SO10 long text) |
| QMTT | GELOESCHT | QGEL | Text Record Deleted | CHAR | 1 | Optional |
| QMTT | MANDT | MANDT | Client | CLNT | 3 | System (no load mapping) |
| ID | Criticality | Error Message/Report Description | Rule | Output | Source System |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:
The ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) process is a structured approach to data migration and management, ensuring high-quality data is seamlessly transferred across systems. Here’s a breakdown of its key components:
1. Extraction
The process begins with extracting metadata and raw data from source systems, such as Syensqo ECC system (i.e. WP2/PF2) periodically. The extracted data is then staged for transformation.
2. Transformation
Once extracted, the data undergoes cleansing, consolidation, and governance. This step ensures data integrity, consistency, and compliance with business rules. The transformation process includes:
- Data validation to remove inconsistencies.
- Standardization to align formats across datasets.
- Business rule application to refine data for operational use.
3. Loading
The transformed data is then loaded into the target S/4HANA system.
Extract data from a source into Syniti Migrate. There are 2 possibilities:
The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads
| Req # | Requirement Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Extraction Scope Definition | - Identify the source systems and databases involved. - Define the data objects (tables, fields, records) to be extracted. - Establish business rules for data selection. | Syniti / LTC Data team |
| Extraction Methodology | - Specify the extraction approach (full, incremental, or delta extraction). - Determine the tools and technologies used. - Define data filtering criteria to exclude irrelevant records. | Syniti |
| Extraction Execution Plan | - Establish execution timelines and batch processing schedules. - Assign responsibilities for extraction monitoring. - Document dependencies on other migration tasks. | Syniti |
| Data Quality and Validation | - Define error handling mechanisms for extraction failures. | Syniti |
| Selection Ref Screen | Parameter Name | Selection Type | Requirement | Value to be entered/set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not applicable | ||||
<Object> DCT Rules
| Field Name | Field Description | Rule |
|---|---|---|
List the steps that need to occur before extraction can commence
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow Syniti Migrate to make the data Target ready:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Transformation Rules
| Rule # | Source system | Source Table | Source Field | Source Description | Target System | Target Table | Target Field | Target Description | Transformation Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mapping Table Name | Mapping Table Description |
|---|---|
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
The load process includes:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Load Phase and Dependencies
Identify the phase as to “when” the load for this object will occur. <Pre-Cutover, Cutover, Post Cutover> and list the steps that need to occur before the load can commence
List the Configurations required before loading can commence
| Item # | Configuration Item |
|---|---|
| Object # | Preceding Object Conversion Approach |
|---|---|
| list the exact title of the conversion object of only the immediate predecessor – this will then confirm the DDD (Data Dependency Diagram) | |
The table below depicts some possible system errors for this data object during data load. All data load error is to be logged as defect and managed within the Defect Management
| Error Type | Error Description | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
Any additional key assumptions.
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.