| Status | |
|---|---|
| Owner | CASTRO MONCAYO-ext, Jose Luis |
| Stakeholders |
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create <Data Object> in S/4 HANA.
Summarise how the data is currently utilized and set up in the legacy system/s and how object is intended to be represented in S/4, and any other relevant information
Material Master - PPDS Views are now used to make some of the Planning activities in both systems (PF2 & WP2). Most of the materials used in the planning process have these views updated, as they contain relevant information about the planning process. The aim is to get the conversion into S4 HANA in a standard way, so it can be used in the new planning processes already defined by the functional team and validated with the business.
While PF2 and WP2 serve as source systems, extensive mapping and transformation logic will be necessary to produce properly formatted load templates in line with the target design. As this is a new view a complete new DCT will be needed, as NO migration data on Scope.
We need to create a NEW Layout to fill in for the new data per material / Plant combination
The data from legacy system may include:
The data from legacy system excludes:
The data from legacy system includes:
The data from legacy system excludes:
| Source | Scope | Source Approx No. of Records | Target System | Target Approx No. of Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF2 | All planning materials | 15,000 | S4 HANA | TBD |
| WP2 | All Planning materials | 30,000 | S4 HANA | TBD |
| N/A | ||||
System Multi-language standard definition
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Fields in Scope for PPDS view
The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.
| Table | Field | Data Element | Field Description | Data Type | Length | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARA | MATNR | MATNR | Material Number | CHAR | 18 | R |
| T001W | WERKS | WERKS | Plant ID | CHAR | 4 | R |
| MARA | MEINS | MEINS | Unit of measure in which stock of the material is managed. | UNIT | 3 | R |
| MARA | PPSKZ | PPSKZ | Indicator for Advanced Planning | CHAR | 1 | C |
| MARC | SCM_PRIO | /SAPAPO/PRIO | Priority of Product | INT1 | 3 | C |
| MARC | SCM_RRP_TYPE | /SAPAPO/PPS_PLANNING_TYPE | PP Planning Procedure | CHAR | 1 | C |
| MARC | SCM_RRP_SEL_GROUP | /SAPAPO/RRP_SEL_GROUP | Planning Group | CHAR | 2 | C |
| MARC | SCM_PEG_FUTURE_ALERT | /SAPAPO/DM_PEGGING_FUTUR_ALERT | Alert threshold for early receipts | DEC | 11 | C |
| MARC | SCM_PEG_PAST_ALERT | /SAPAPO/DM_PEGGING_PAST_ALERT | Alert Threshold for Lateness | DEC | 11 | C |
| MARC | SCM_GET_ALERTS | /SAPAPO/GET_ALERTS_FOR_PROD | Product Alerts | CHAR | 1 | C |
No Data to clean as this is a new view in the Materials
If data cleansing is managed outside of the source system (e.g. Syniti Migrate, 3rd Party Vendor, DCT), the necessary documentation must be produced and appended to this deliverable for sign-off.
| ID | Criticality | Error Message/Report Description | Rule | Output | Source System |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | |||||
The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:

Extract data from a source into Syniti Migrate. There are 2 possibilities:
The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads
| Req # | Requirement Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Selection Ref Screen | Parameter Name | Selection Type | Requirement | Value to be entered/set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
<Object> DCT Rules
| Field Name | Field Description | Rule |
|---|---|---|
List the steps that need to occur before extraction can commence
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow Syniti Migrate to make the data Target ready:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Transformation Rules
| Rule # | Source system | Source Table | Source Field | Source Description | Target System | Target Table | Target Field | Target Description | Transformation Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mapping Table Name | Mapping Table Description |
|---|---|
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
The load process includes:
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Load Phase and Dependencies
Identify the phase as to “when” the load for this object will occur. <Pre-Cutover, Cutover, Post Cutover> and list the steps that need to occur before the load can commence
List the Configurations required before loading can commence
| Item # | Configuration Item |
|---|---|
| Object # | Preceding Object Conversion Approach |
|---|---|
| list the exact title of the conversion object of only the immediate predecessor – this will then confirm the DDD (Data Dependency Diagram) | |
The table below depicts some possible system errors for this data object during data load. All data load error is to be logged as defect and managed within the Defect Management
| Error Type | Error Description | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
| title | specific details of what and how the task needs to be performed e.g. which reports are being used etc. |
Any additional key assumptions.
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.