| Status | Pending Stakeholder Review |
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders | John Donovan, Frank Bolata, Boris Foiselle |
Issue
A key challenge in the M365 transformation is managing the period of coexistence, during which both Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 will be used simultaneously. Prolonged coexistence can lead to increased complexity, higher support costs, user confusion, and potential security risks. Therefore, it is critical to identify a migration approach that minimizes the duration of dual-platform usage while ensuring a smooth transition, business continuity, and minimal disruption to employees.
The decision to be made is to select the most effective migration strategy that reduces the coexistence period, addresses technical and operational requirements, and supports a seamless user experience.
Recommendation
After careful consideration of the risks and challenges associated with prolonged coexistence of Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, it is recommended that Syensqo adopts a wave-based migration approach rather than a "big bang" migration.
Rationale for Wave-Based Approach
- Controlled Transition: Migrating users and data in defined waves allows for better management of technical and operational complexities.
- Risk Mitigation: Issues can be identified and resolved early in smaller groups, reducing the risk of widespread disruption.
- User Support: IT and support teams can focus on smaller user groups at a time, providing more effective training and troubleshooting.
- Business Continuity: Critical business functions can be prioritized and migrated at optimal times, minimizing impact on day-to-day operations.
- Reduced Coexistence Period: While not as immediate as a big bang, a well-planned wave approach can still significantly shorten the coexistence period by enabling parallel preparation and execution.
Background & Context
By following this strategy, the organization aims to achieve the following:
- Enhance collaboration and productivity by consolidating services under Microsoft 365.
- Ensure data integrity and compliance with enterprise standards.
- Minimize risks and downtime during the migration process.
- Deliver a seamless user experience.
Assumptions
All data will be migrated (emails, personal documents in My Drive, Shared document in Shared Drive and Aodocs
Constraints
Microsoft Fast track imposes the following contraints
- Max amount of data migrated
- Max number of accounts migrated
- etc...
Impacts
Business Rules
Options considered
Option 1: One Shot Cutover
Option 2A: Migration by waves - GBU/BSA/GBS driven
Option 2B: Migration by waves - regional approach driven
Evaluation
| Option 1 One Shot Cut Over | Option 2A Migration by waves - GBU/BSA/GBS driven | Option 2B Migration by waves - regional approach driven |
|---|
| Technical Feasibility | 16 K active users (20 K active Mailboxes ~229 TB mailbox + ~181 TB MyDrive)
3194 active shared drives (~ 63,6 TB Shared Drives)+ 2116 AODocs Lib. (13,7 TB)
| Can tailor the waves to adhere to the constraints imposed by Microsoft Fastrack
|
|
| User Impact | All of Syensqo is impacted at the same time "bank aid" approach in some cases can be seen as a better approach to change management
| Collaboration between users of the same GBU will be easier as they will not have any coexistence period within
Should collaboration need to occur with a GBU/BSA or GBS that has not yet migrated users will need to follow coexistence recommendation
|
|
| Support Impact | Little possibility to ramp up the IT Support organisation, over the weekend they need to go from supporting fully one tool to another one
| Ramp up of full support through a controlled process
Will be supporting the users in a same country on two different platforms
| |
| Operational Complexity |
| | |
| Cost |
| | |
See also
LM01-KDD002: Gmail Migration to Exchange Online
LM01-KDD003: Migration to SharePoint
LM01-KDD004: Personal Drives Migration to OneDrive