| Status | |
|---|---|
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders | |
| Jira Request ID | Enter the Jira request card URL here (Use the Jira macro to search and add) |
| Jira Development ID | Enter the Jira development card URL here (Use the Jira macro to search and add) |
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Application System | |
| Business Process Reference |
Business require ability to change the stock types at handling unit level using Neptune mobility solution. This transaction will allow the stock type change such as e.g unrestricted to blocked stock for all the contents within the handling unit.
Scope and Objectives
The scope of this document is limited to the development of the Neptune mobility transaction to allow stock type status changes at handling unit level. The Neptune mobile transaction will facilitate to perform stock type change at HU level (applicable to all the contents in the HU)
Insert the flowchart and fill in the steps
Step | Description | Comment |
|---|---|---|
None
None
None
None
KDD055 - Multi-Language Support
None
Syensqo business will require ability to transfer the stock into different stock type at handling unit level. This is identified as a business requirement within the scope of Neptune mobile transactions. This transaction will be new screen to be developed in Neptune mobile app that will support the user interface to execute the transaction and the background processing of the data to transfer the stocks into required stock type using posting change.
The Neptune mobile transaction will have the user menu option on the screen as a part of the main or sub menu of the process. This option will display the stock type change option
Consider which technology will be most appropriate – the use of Fiori framework as User Interfaces, other than this, justification is required.
Please provide a Hi fidelity mock-up of the new application’s screens. Ensure Syensqo's Brand standards are adhered to. (i.e. logo, font, colors, etc.)
The developers should follow UI best practice to keep the screens user-friendly and consistent
Is any dynamic screen behaviour required? This typically sets the visibility, read-only or mandatory properties of the UI elements. E.g. if field ‘a’ has a value ‘x’, then make fields ‘b’, ‘c’ and ‘d’ read-only, and make field ‘e’ mandatory. For simple input fields, does the value need to be validated? Can a value-help be assigned?
How will the user navigate between screens? Are any buttons required that trigger actions?
Provide the details about the information will be displayed in the interface and where /how the information will be read/stored from. This must match to the screen mock-up
| Field | Table-Field Name | Comments / Calculation / Field Manipulation / Input / Output / Validation rule / Value help |
|---|---|---|
If any custom configuration tables are required, which will be read by the enhancement logic, then specify them here. Can be deleted if not needed.
Include an overview of the table and what it’s used for
| Field | Description | Data Type/Length | Validation rule / Value help |
|---|---|---|---|
Include an overview of the table and what it’s used for
| Field | Description | Data Type/Length | Validation rule / Value help |
|---|---|---|---|
Can tooltips or input prompts be used to help and guide the user?
Mention the environment (desktop, mobile phone, tablet) in which this User Interface will be running. This will drive the screen estate/size of the screen.
Explain mobility services will be integrated in the Interface, i.e. Intune, MS Company Portal,
Detail authentication and authorization mechanisms, i.e. SSO/SAML, SSO/SNC.
Detail if the Interface will have accessibility features, i.e. Speech Recognition, Photos, Barcode Input
Provide volumetrics details: Initial load volumes, Number of Records, Expected Frequency, Expected Long term Growth)
Specify if there are any specific performance factors that need to be taken into consideration during development i.e. interface must be able to handle 100 posting per-hour, etc.
Detail how errors will be handled: Notification, Restart/ Recovery and Re-Processing Procedures
Please provide some guidance and/or test data to help the developer unit test the user interface. This can be included here or in a separate document. If possible, testing is to be done prior by Functional team, for those transactions or business processes to be automated. Please include both positive and negative testing (to validate error situations handling)
List all test conditions – this will then be used as a basis to execute both the technical and functional unit tests
| ID | Condition | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
List any considerations essential for application test planning (e.g., test this before ABC along with DEF separate from GHI). If the development encompasses a user interface, explain how to test it. List any insights as to how this component could be tested the most efficiently.
| Package Name | Parent Package |
|---|---|
UI Type | UI Name | Fiori Catalogue | Design Rationale Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| API Type | API Name | Purpose / High Level Logic | API Product | Design Rationale Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object Type | Object Name | Purpose/High Level Logic | Design Rationale Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.