| Status | |
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders |
The HR Contract solution within Syensqo is presently supported by OpenText, augmented by PowerDocs and xECM for document generation and document management and DocuSign for digital signatures. While all countries currently use OpenText for storing documents (employee personnel files), the document generation solution is being used by 9 countries (primarily for HR contracts but also for other HR documents).
With SyWay implementing the Icertis Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) solution across the enterprise for functions such as Sales, Procurement, and Legal, it is being assessed whether OpenText or Icertis offers the most effective capabilities for managing HR contract lifecycle processes.
While Icertis offers robust capabilities for complex and multi-stakeholder contracting, OpenText's strengths directly align with the simpler and more standardized processes associated with HR contracts.
It is important to recognize that the primary objective is to identify a solution specifically suited for generating HR employment contracts. These contracts are generally less complex and less bespoke than commercial agreements. As such, the selected solution should prioritize usability, efficiency, and consistency over advanced customization capabilities typically required for commercial contracting.
By clearly understanding the complexity of Commercial contracts and standard HR Employment contracts, we can make an informed decision on the most suitable approach.
| Commercial Contracts (Contract for services/consultancy) | Standard HR Employment Contracts |
|---|---|
| More diverse with formats because of the different legal and commercial frameworks, tax treatments governed by general contract law; terms are primarily agreed upon by the parties | Follow mostly a uniform format, governed by extensive employment law and statutory rights |
| Often bespoke, negotiated case-by-case to reflect role-specific deliverables, performance metrics, intellectual property considerations, or service outputs | Rely largely on standard clauses with minimal negotiation |
| Complex payment schedules that require precise drafting and legal review | Simple pay-and-benefits model |
| More detailed terms and conditions, non-compete and non-solicit restrictions tailored to type of service | Standard terms usually dictated by the employer as to when, where and how the work is to be done |
| Involve HR, Legal, Finance, Procurement, and sometimes external advisers or board-level approval | Usually requires only HR and minimal legal oversight |
Our key design question is Should Syensqo continue to use OpenText -PowerDocs and Content Management for SAP SF and expand it to be a global solution (with exceptions) for generating HR contracts OR adopt Icertis for HR Contract Management as the enterprise wide tool for generating contracts, replacing OpenText?
What benefit/value will the change of tool from OpenText to Icertis bring?
There are 3 options to consider:
Option 1), Keep existing HR Contract solution using OpenText and DocuSign, expand scope to make it a global solution for Tier 1 & Tier 2 countries
OpenText solutions (PowerDocs and xECM) are currently used by Syensqo for new hire contract generation and document storage in 9 countries. The recommendation is to expand this solution for other countries based on the following classification:
1) OpenText solutions to be expanded for all Tier1 and Tier 2 countries. The additional Tier 1 and 2 countries that require new templates to be created and deployed will be part of SyWay Release 1. Tier 3 countries (headcount <50) to be excluded from scope of SyWay
2) As part of SyWay Release 1, OpenText solutions to be deployed for new hire contract generation only (excluding other HR documents)
3) For other HR related documents that are required to be generated by a few countries, a further assessment still needs to be done, after which it can be addressed together with OpenText experts in terms of feasibility and timelines. These requirements might form part of a BAU initiative
Our recommendation is based on the following:
HR employment contracts are often relatively standardized (template-based), so strong template management in OpenText is very valuable.
OpenText has a long history of strong document governance which makes it a reliable and secure choice.
OpenText is especially good for standardized, predictable workflows whereas Icertis excels in complex multi-party negotiations, not simple HR flows.
The HR use cases are to generate employment contracts and related annexures, OpenText meets the requirement and works well for the countries that are using it currently.
The current end to end Lead to HR Contracts Management process includes different tools and stakeholders to support the process:
There are some exceptions to this process, as per legal constraints in the US (Offer Letter is used as the official Contract) and China (eSignature is not legal, contract generated via OpenText, but send for manual signing locally)
The current OpentText solution primarily serves the HR department for managing and storing all HR and employee documentation - created by PowerDocs, issued manually or provided by employees. Open Text also ensures self service to employees to view all their HR documentation via SuccessFactors. Today for HR document (mainly contract) generation Power docs is used for the scope below:
| Country Scope | Current Contract Scope |
|---|---|
| BELGIUM |
|
| BRAZIL |
|
| CHINA |
|
| FRANCE |
|
| ITALY |
|
| PORTUGAL |
|
| UK |
|
| SPAIN |
|
| THAILAND |
|
Exceptions:
| |
While the present system supports the required capabilities, it still poses a number of challenges, including:
A more comprehensive contract lifecycle management solution offering modern and advanced features, Gen AI capabilities and out of the box integrations could be interesting to leverage in a long run for our HR Document management processes.
Icertis is typically recommended for Contract Management and considered Leading Practice when
Proposed business rules include:
Objective: This solution means that SyWay Release 1 will additionally implement existing solution to remaining Tier 1 and Tier 2 countries for contract generation only. The process designed by SyWay for offer letter to contract generation and signature should be rolled out to additional countries specified below.
There are 2 variants of this process - 1) countries that allow digital signature will use DocuSign for automated process 2) countries that require wet signature or consider offer letter as the contract will follow a slightly varied process
Key Advantages
Key Challenges
Objective: This option promotes the implementation of the Icertis Contract Management HR capabilities, integrating it with SuccessFactors and OpenText to enhance cross-functional collaboration, information accuracy, greater compliance and enhanced operational efficiency. This is considered to be a short-term hybrid approach to minimize disruption and accelerate value, bringing potential scalability in long-term. OpenText is kept for HR Document archives while Icertis would be added for HR contracts generation
Key Advantages
Key Challenges:
Option C: Replace existing HR Contract solution by Icertis for Contract Lifecycle Management
This option promotes the implementation of the Icertis Contract Management HR capabilities for end-to-end HR contract lifecycle. It integrates it with SuccessFactors and DocuSign for eSignature, aiming to standardize all contract workflows in Icertis. OpenText is decommissioned in a phased-out approach. This means that Icertis will be used as the central HR repository for all employee records, requiring migration, configuration, access setup, training, adoption effort and integration with SuccessFactors. This is considered to be a long-term approach.
Key Advantages
Key Challenges
Option A: Keep existing HR Contract solution using OpenText and DocuSign, expand scope to make it a global solution for Tier 1 & Tier 2 countries | Option B: Hybrid approach, using Icertis together with OpenText | Option C:Make Icertis the global solution for HR Contracts | |
|---|---|---|---|
Costs |
|
| |
Implementation & Maintenance Efforts |
|
|
|
User Adoption and Experience |
|
| |
Solution Architecture Leading Practice |
|
|
|
Scalability & Future-Proofing |
|
|
|
Security, Legal & Compliance |
|
|
|
Reference to the representation of flow per current process:
