| Status | |
|---|---|
| Owner | FRUTEAU-ext, Sabrina |
| Stakeholders | The business stakeholders involved in making, reviewing, and endorsing this decision. Type @ to mention people by name |
| Jira Request ID | |
| Jira Development ID |
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Application System |
SAP S/4HANA - [ERP] (Rest of World instance) |
| Business Process Reference | 10.02.03.04. Manage Project Time Allocation |
Time booking for projects is managed through the My Timesheet application. In certain situations, it is necessary to record time spent on non-project (business-as-usual, BAU) activities to enable tracking and reporting, without affecting project financials.
Statistical WBS Elements are utilized for logging hours not directly related to specific projects, primarily to monitor BAU costs. These elements are created by Financial Controllers for reporting purposes only, with costs assigned to the employee’s or contingent worker’s cost center. This enhancement streamlines the process by automatically populating the Receiver cost center when users save their timesheet entries, eliminating the need for manual input.
Statistical project structures (WBS elements) are designed to capture non-project time for reporting. Since no costs are posted directly to statistical WBS elements, each time entry must specify a receiver cost object, specifically, a receiver cost center.
In standard SAP, the cost center can be derived from the WBS element itself. However, this approach would require creating duplicate WBS elements for each cost center, which is inefficient. To address this, the receiver cost center should be automatically provided during the time posting process.
Step | Description | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | From My Timesheet application, user creates a new entry and selects a Statistical WBS element to record non project time. | |
| 2 | Time is entered on the statistical WBS element. User submit the entry and save. | When user submit the entry, the standard field Receiver Cost Centre is being populated by the cost center assigned to the personnel id (from HR record). |
| 3 | Entry is saved. | The Receiver cost center is the sole cost receiver. |
Describe any assumptions that have been made in the process of completing this design. What functionality is expected of configuration or other developments that pass information to this development and/ or retrieve the information processed by it (performance, triggers, exceptions, etc.)
ERP-164 CATS Enhancement for Intercompany Recharge: FS introducing the custom Posting WBS element field.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Detail the functional requirements that are desired to be achieved by the Enhancement compared to current functionality
Typically, an enhancement will be based on an existing SAP BADI / user exit. If this is the case, please provide the proposed details of the BADI / user exit.
Include an overview of the source. Can be deleted if not needed.
| Table | Field Name | Comments/Calculation/Field Manipulation |
|---|---|---|
Include an overview of the data validation requirement. Can be deleted if not needed.
| Table | Field Name | Comments/Calculation/Field Manipulation |
|---|---|---|
If any custom configuration tables are required, which will be read by the enhancement logic, then specify them here. Can be deleted if not needed.
<Title Custom Table 1>
<Include an overview of the table and what it’s used for>
| Field | Description | Data Type/Length | Validation rule/ Value Help |
|---|---|---|---|
Title Configuration Table 1
Include an overview of the table and what it’s used for
| Field | Description | Data Type/Length | Validation rule/ Value Help |
|---|---|---|---|
This section will give the details on the selection screen parameters, parameter type and whether it’s obligatory or not. This section can be used to define the Import Export parameters for Function Module or User Exit or Screens. Can be deleted if not needed.
| Field Name | Description | Select: Option or Parameter Check box or Radio button Import or Export | Data Type/Length | Default Value/ Validation rule/ Value Help | Selection Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The objective is to automatically populate the Receiver Cost Center field with the employee’s (PERNR’s) cost center when a statistical WBS element is selected.
WBS Element Selection:
The user selects a WBS element from the custom Posting WBS element field (CATSWBS).
Field Synchronization:
Functional Specification ERP-164 ensures that the selected Posting WBS element is synchronized with the standard Receiver WBS element field (CATSDB-RPROJ) using the user exit CATS0002 (Supplement recorded data). This user exit enables modification of the user’s entry, allowing the Receiver WBS element to be set before saving.
Statistical Check and Cost Center Assignment:
After the Receiver WBS element has been auto-populated via enhancement ERP-164, the system verifies whether the Receiver WBS element (RPROJ) populated is statistical:
Save Entry:
The timesheet entry is then saved with the appropriate Receiver Cost Center populated as needed.
N/A
Specify if there are any specific performance factors that need to be taken into consideration during development i.e. enhancement must be able to be executed by 10 users at the same time, etc.
Detail how errors will be handled: Notification, Restart/ Recovery and Re-Processing Procedures
Please provide some guidance and/or test data to help the developer unit test the enhancement. Please include both positive and negative testing (to validate error situations handling). The developer will need to test repeatedly, so where appropriate provide instructions to reverse the actions performed so the test may be run again or explain how to create new input data to the test. The developer will need logons for test users representing the various roles within the approval process.
| ID | Condition | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
List any considerations essential for application test planning (e.g., test this before ABC along with DEF separate from GHI). If the development encompasses a user interface, explain how to test it. List any insights as to how this component could be tested the most efficiently.
| Package Name | Parent Package |
|---|---|
| Enhancement Type | Standard Definition Name | Custom Implementation Name | Design Rationale Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Object Type | Object Name | Purpose/High Level Logic | Design Rationale Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
This table is based on the Syensqo development standards document. It provides the naming conventions for authorization groups to associated with custom reports and tables to comply with security requirements.
ABAP | ZFI | ZMM | ZPS | ZCO | ZSD | ZBC | ZFI | ZCA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TABLES | ZFIT | ZMMT | ZPST | ZCOT | ZSDT | ZBCT | ZFIT | ZCAT |
Insert links and references to other documents which are relevant when trying to understand this decision and its implications. Other decisions are often impacted, so it's good to list them here with links. Attachments are also possible but dangerous as they are static documents and not updated by their authors.
