You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Status

  Approved

Owner
Stakeholders

Issue

Project time and budget management are the key performance indicators of effective project management. Syensqo's project management procedure requires the project managers to deliver the projects on time and under budget. Budget management and cost tracking is performed in the ERP (WP1 and PF1) SAP applications and Colmar but dates and schedules are managed offline. There is no integration of project tasks, dates nor duration with ERP project. Each GBU have their own rules for managing project tasks and are managed in various applications such as Google sheets, MSP, Primavera etc. The lack of Integration of project information (dates, schedules etc.) leads to inefficient and un-reliable decision making for budget allocation. In addition manual efforts are required to co-ordinate between financial controllers and Project managers in order to deliver the project on time and on budget.

This KDD intends to evaluate potential solution options required for effective project schedule management integration with project financial management.

Recommendation

Based on the analysis and evaluation presented in this document, Integrate with Project Schedule Management (Automatic) (Option A in this document) is recommended for automated and effective decision making and progress tracking of the Projects.  This KDD emphasizes on standardization of project schedule management process and application Various existing applications will be replaced by a suitable application that will be determined in detailed design.  The recommended integration can be with a selected project schedule management data within SAP or  within a 3rd party application.

Background & Context

Schedule management in project management is the process of planning, developing, controlling, and monitoring a project timeline to make sure that tasks and activities are completed on time. Currently in Syensqo, the management of dates and tasks are managed in various applications and it is up to the GBU and/or project managers discretion. Project dates/schedule are managed in various applications such a Google sheets, Microsoft projects or Primavera depending on the complexity and the nature of the project.  It is required to have flexibility that allows simple projects to have simplified plan and complex projects with several tasks and interdependencies.  However, these dates doesn't integrate with the Project financial management application (ERP WP1 or PF1) or process. 

There is a lack of integrated project schedule management with project financial management. If there is a variation of timelines or delays due to change in scope or other issues, there is no visibility of the impacts on project budget/costs in a timely manner. Accurate project forecasts cannot be done and therefore this leads inefficient and inaccurate decision making and delivery of the project.

Opportunities

Integrating a standardized project schedule management application with the project financial management process/application across Syensqo presents multiple benefits, including informed decision making, accurate and timely capitalization of costs, project tracking and timely delivery of benefits aimed by the project. 

Assumptions

  • SAP S/4HANA EPPM will be the primary project portfolio management application used for financial management of all types of projects (simple, medium or complex) in various domains  (i.e. Industrial solutions, R&I, IT)
  • Standardized project schedule management process and application will be required for the seamless integration
  • The detailed management of project tasks, schedules, and resources are based on the complexity of the project to provide the flexibility and ease of management
  • Analysis & assessment of the various applications (MSP, Primavera, SAP etc.) for detailed schedule/dates management will be done in detailed design.
  • This integration can be with 3rd party application (MSP or Primavera) or internally with in SAP.

Constraints

Analysis & assessment of the various applications (MSP, Primavera, SAP etc.) for detailed schedule/dates management will be based on detailed requirements and will determine the complexity of the integration required with project financial management application and process.

Impacts

Standardization - Requires standardization of process and application for Project schedule management

Data quality and migration - Requires consolidation, sourcing and cleansing of data from various applications for seamless integration

Business Rules

Detailed business rules will be determined during detailed design phase to standardize and integrate with Project financial management application (S/4HANA EPPM).

Options considered

Option A: Integrate with Project Schedule Management application (Automatic)

Project schedule/dates are critical to the delivery of project objectives and benefits on time. Delay in the project can lead to delayed realization of the benefits and impacts the return on investments. Typically the project schedule/dates management are done at (granular) Task level whereas the project financial management is performed at the (summarized) key deliverables level using work breakdown structures based (WBS) on assets being delivered.  It is critical to get the right balance of information from project schedule management to integrate with the project financial management. Dates/duration of the detailed tasks are summarized and integrated with the Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) to determine the delivery of each phase or deliverable of project. SAP S/4HANA EPPM (Enterprise portfolio and project management) offers integration capability with different third-party schedule management systems such as Primavera or MSP.

Benefits of Integration

  • Allows optimized Work Breakdown structure as the details of Tasks and schedules are managed in project schedule management application
  • Allows determination of accurate phase dates derived from the tasks dates and duration via interface
  • Improves accuracy of forecasts based on derived delivery dates
  • Timely capitalization of costs based on the accurate delivery dates
  • Enables efficient decision making for budget allocation and updates
  • Timely alerts lead to timely actions to mitigate issues and risks

Therefore, an interface with the project schedule management is required with SAP S/4HANA EPPM for seamless integration of Project financial management.


Option B: Continue as-is (Manual Update)

Continue using the existing applications for managing schedule and dates for tasks of the project. Manually input and update the project financial management (i.e. SAP S/4HANA EPPM) for project start and end dates. Business rule and discipline to be established to update the dates of the project deliverables and phases in timely manner. Due diligence and monitoring reports will be required to be developed to monitor the dates update.


Evaluation

Table below outlines the comparison of the proposed options for effective integration of project schedule management application with SAP S/4HANA EPPM. - Project Financial management) application. 


Evaluation Criteria

Option A - Integrate with Project Schedule Management application (Automatic)

Option B - 

Continue as-is (Manual Update)

Automation & Efficiency

(tick) Automatic interface increases efficiency as there is no manual handling

(error)  Manual and Error prone data

Audit trail

(tick) Clear audit trail of information updated by interface 

(error)  limited & less reliable audit trail as there can be updates made at different times by different people 
Cost(warning) Initial cost of implementation (tick) No additional costs as the updates are manual
Ease of decision making(tick) Timely update of the dates enables timely actions for informed decision making such as capitalization of costs and Budget allocation(warning) Decision making completely relies on manual updates
Accuracy & data integrity(tick) Automatic interface improves data integrity and ensures accuracy of information due to seamless integration(error)  Manual process compromises data quality and integrity

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 11) Aug 23, 2024 06:21 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 30 Aug 12, 2024 09:40 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 29 Aug 12, 2024 09:40 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 28 Aug 01, 2024 12:52 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 27 Aug 01, 2024 12:41 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 26 Aug 01, 2024 09:59 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 25 Aug 01, 2024 09:56 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 24 Aug 01, 2024 09:41 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 23 Aug 01, 2024 09:23 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 22 Aug 01, 2024 09:23 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 21 Aug 01, 2024 09:08 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 20 Aug 01, 2024 09:06 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 19 Aug 01, 2024 09:00 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 18 Aug 01, 2024 08:46 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 17 Aug 01, 2024 05:36 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 16 Aug 01, 2024 05:34 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 15 Jul 31, 2024 13:54 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 14 Jul 29, 2024 14:29 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 13 Jul 29, 2024 14:25 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 12 Jul 29, 2024 14:16 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 11 Jul 29, 2024 13:19 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 10 Jul 24, 2024 11:58 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 9 Jul 24, 2024 11:52 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 8 Jul 24, 2024 09:26 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 7 Jul 24, 2024 08:43 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 6 Jul 23, 2024 12:50 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 5 Jul 23, 2024 12:26 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 4 Jul 23, 2024 09:49 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 3 Jul 23, 2024 09:17 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 2 Jul 23, 2024 06:38 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali
v. 1 Jul 23, 2024 06:06 UPADHYAY-ext, Anjali

Workflow history

Title Last Updated By Updated Status  
There are no pages at the moment.

  • No labels