You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 22 Next »

Status

  Approved

OwnerROWLINSON-ext, Kerry 
Stakeholders
Jira Request ID

ERP-243 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Jira Development ID

ERP-256 - Getting issue details... STATUS

High- Level Specification

ParameterValue
Application SystemSAP ECC PF2, SAP ECC WP2
Business Process Reference03.04.04.01. Manage Outline Agreements (R2)

Functional Overview

Icertis Contract Intelligence is the contract management and authoring application for Syensqo's purchase contracts. Purchase orders are created in SAP ECC with reference to purchase contracts (outline agreements). The key information from the legal contract which is relevant for procurement forms the basis of the purchase contract or outline agreement in SAP ECC.  The integration between Icertis and SAP ECC for release 2 is a custom table in SAP ECC to hold key header field content from Icertis (ERP-260 Integration Process - Icertis to SAP ECC Contract Data Replication & ERP-261 System Interface - Icertis Contract Data Replication to SAP ECC). This custom table supports the main objectives:

  1. To enable a relationship between the Icertis Agreement Code and the SAP outline agreement number.
  2. To report where there are inconsistencies in the data between the two systems.

This enhancement is to provide a convenient method for the users to update the SAP outline agreements with their corresponding Icertis Agreement Code numbers in bulk. A custom field to hold the ICM Agreement Code has been defined in ERP-259 Enhancement for Storage of Icertis ID on OA Header and the program to be created on this spec will allow contract specialists and GBS to update those contracts in bulk and 

This enhancement will provide a convenient method for contract specialists and GBS to bulk edit two fields in Outline Agreements in PF2 and WP2.

  • ICM agreement code (EKKO-ZZICMAGREEMENTCODE)
  • OA Verification Status (a new custom field that will need to be defined in EKKO as part of this enhancement - eg: ZZOAVERIFSTAT). 

Scope and Objectives

For one purchase contract in Icertis, there can be multiple outline agreements created in SAP ECC (one per relevant purchasing organization). The Icertis Agreement Code is to be entered on the header of each outline agreement. This can be done during the creation of each one, or via ME32K Change Outline Agreement after creation and one outline agreement at a time. This enhancement allows contract specialists and also GBS members to update in bulk the ICM Agreement code and also the OA Verification status via a new transaction code.

The intended business process is for all new outline agreements created in SAP ECC after the introduction of Icertis Contract Management to be assigned to the respective Icertis legal contract via the entry of the ICM Agreement Code on the header when the outline agreement is created. Currently active outline agreements exist in SAP ECC which may not have a signed legal contract, and many outline agreements have an open-ended validity period which makes it difficult to determine which outline agreements are relevant to be migrated to S/4 HANA.

To assist with the process of identifying outline agreements which have been verified for migration, this enhancement will provide an additional field on the header to allow the classification of the outline agreement for migration without a legal contract, or not for migration. The population of this field will assist Syensqo to categorize outline agreements:

  • which have been verified as not having a current legal contract but require migration to S/4 HANA
  • which have been verified to not be migrated
  • which still require verification for migration or not, and association to an Icertis agreement

The categorization of outline agreements in this way will assist in the management of activities relating to the migration of outline agreements to S/4 HANA. Agreements which have already been categorized as 'not for migration' or 'migrate without a legal contract' can be identified on the report of outline agreements without an ICM contract (ERP-503 Consolidation Report Icertis SAP ECC Outline Agreements - Story) to avoid repeat analysis of them. From a business process point of view, it is recommended that users enter a more detailed reason in an internal text for the required omission of a legal contract.

Both the ICM Agreement Code and the OA Verification fields are available to update via the standard mass maintenance transaction for outline agreements (MEMASSCONTRACT). However, mass maintenance is more complex, makes available the mass update of all header and line-item fields, and is mostly used only by GBS for specific outline agreement changes. This custom developed transaction will make updates to these two fields only in a user-friendly, low-risk format.

For the correction of other key data in SAP ECC which is not aligned with Icertis, the existing upload programs for change outline agreement can be used, or the contract can be changed directly in transaction ME32K.


Process Flow Diagram

Step

Description

System

Comment

1

Consolidation report for purchase contracts is executed in BW

BW

Report shows entries in the custom table in ECC for Icertis purchase contracts and their assignment to outline agreements in SAP ECC, as well as outline agreements not assigned an ICM Agreement Code.

2

Complete search for legal Icertis purchase contract corresponding to outline agreement

SAP ECC & Icertis

Outline Agreements without an Icertis Agreement Code are analyzed to determine if there is a legal contract in Icertis which should be assigned on the outline agreement. 

3Update the outline agreement with the Icertis Agreement CodeSAP ECCThe update program is used to enter the Icertis agreement code on the header of each of the relevant outline agreements
4Update the verification indicator on the outline agreementSAP ECCIf the outline agreement does not have a corresponding Icertis Agreement, the verification indicator is set either (i) migration without Icertis agreement  or (ii) not to be migrated









Assumptions

N/A

Dependencies

In order to assign an ICM Agreement code to the Outline agreement, the ICM Agreement code must exist in the ZMM_ICM* Tables. 

Security, Integrity and Controls

The new program will need to be assigned to a transaction code so that contract specialists and GBS employees can run this new application. 

We do not require to create any new authorization objects given that when trying to change the Outline Agreement, SAP will check that the user has access to modify the document (including Org checks).

The new transaction will be added to an existing role in WP2 and PF2.

It is suggested to use a BAPI to change the outline agreements, which can also help us to run the program in test run mode and leverage the error log coming from table RETURN. 

Configuration Requirements

The new field OA Verification Status which will need to be included in the contract header screen on ME31K / ME32K and ME33K will need to have the following behaviour:

  1. Field is optional.
  2. Only allowed values are:
    1. 01 - Verified without ICM Contract
    2. 02 - Do Not Migrate



Language Requirements

N/A

Special Requirements


Design Rationale

Functional Requirements

jlkjl


ICM Agreement CodeOA VerificationMeaning
BlankBlankNo Icertis Agreement Code has been assigned to the OA, and no verification of whether the OA is to be migrated.
ICM CodeBlankIf Icertis Contract is assigned, assumption is that OA is relevant for migration. (Cleansing tasks may still be outstanding)
Blank01 Verified Without ICM ContractNo Icertis legal contract for the OA, but OA is required for migration to S/4
Blank02 Do Not MigrateNo Icertis legal contract, and OA is not relevant for migration to S/4

Proposed Technology to Use

It is suggested to:

  • Create a new custom field in EKKO table for "OA Verification status" under the same append structure used for field ZZICMAGREEMENTCODE (append structure ZSMM_ICMAGREEMENT_EKKODB).
  • Replicate similar behaviour for screen interaction used with ZZICMAGREEMENTCODE (User Exits ZXM06U36, ZXM06U37 and ZXM06U43).
  • Create a new abap program which will be responsible to modify the Outline Agreement fields which need to be managed by this functional spec (ICM Agreement Code and "OA Verification Status"). Ideally this program calls BAPI_CONTRACT_CHANGE which will allow to run program in test mode to get things validated before changing the contract and also to get a good error log to be displayed on the screen for users to verify if updates are fine or failed for different reasons.
  • Create a new Transaction code which invokes this new program.
  • Include the new transaction code in existing roles so that relevant users have access to the new developed program.

Data Source Considerations

TableField NameComments/Calculation/Field Manipulation











Data Validation Considerations

The standard BAPI to change contract should validate the fields according to the logic already defined in user exits which validate format of ZZICMAGREEMENTCODE and the new field introduced under this spec (OA Verification Status).

Custom Tables

N/A

Master Data

N/A

Configuration Table

The new field "OA Verification Status", which will be included in table EKKO, will need to have 2 allowed values (+ blank):


FieldDescriptionData Type/LengthValidation rule/ Value Help
ZZOAVERIFSTATOA Validation2 char

01 Verified without ICM Contract

02 Do Not Migrate





Selection Screen Enhancement

The selection screen of the new program will allow the user to either select between two radio buttons:

  • Update ICM Agreement Code
  • Update OA Verification Status

Also, we suggest to have a parameter  field called "Test Run" which will help users running this program to verify if all records can be updated before doing the final update. 


Field NameDescription

Select:

Data Type/LengthDefault Value/ Validation rule/ Value HelpSelection Logic
RB_ICMAUpdate ICM Agreement codeRadio Button Group 1C length 1default X
RB_OAVSUpdate OA Verification StatusRadio Button Group 1C length 1

P_TESTTest RunParameterC length 1default X


Once we update the radio button, we should show below, table of two fields:

  • When user selects "Update ICM Agreement Code, user should see a table with two fields next to each other: Outline Agreement & ICM Agreement Code.
  • When user selects "Update OA Verification Status", user should see a table with two fields next to each other: Outline Agreement & Verification Status. 

User should be able in both cases to upload the two fields "from clipboard". 

Once the data is populated into the input table, user should be able to press execute (F8) and get a final pop-up message saying "You are about to change X number of Outline Agreeements", Please Confirm.

Upon confirmation logic should be applied to modify the outline agreement.

Processing Logic


Volumetrics


Performance Considerations



Error Handling


Testing

How to Test

Test Conditions and Expected Results

IDConditionExpected Result










Test Considerations/Dependencies


Other Information


Development Details

Package

Package NameParent Package




Enhancement Implementation

Enhancement TypeStandard Definition NameCustom Implementation NameDesign Rationale Reference









Other Development Objects

Object TypeObject NamePurpose/High Level LogicDesign Rationale Reference








Appendix

Custom Authorization Group Naming Convention

This table is based on the Syensqo development standards document. It provides the naming conventions for authorization groups to associated with custom reports and tables to comply with security requirements.

ABAP

ZFIZMMZPSZCOZSDZBCZFIZCA
TABLESZFITZMMTZPSTZCOTZSDTZBCTZFITZCAT

See also


No files shared here yet.

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 22) Apr 07, 2026 05:27 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 39 Mar 23, 2026 08:56 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 38 Mar 23, 2026 07:36 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 37 Mar 23, 2026 07:23 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 36 Mar 23, 2026 05:45 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 35 Mar 23, 2026 05:18 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 34 Mar 20, 2026 15:38 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 33 Mar 20, 2026 12:21 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 32 Mar 20, 2026 11:39 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 31 Mar 20, 2026 11:00 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry

Go to Page History

  • No labels