You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Status

  Approved

OwnerAntonio Zappone
StakeholdersGilles Madjarian, Selim Ulhasan

Issue

A decision is required as to whether to transition Treasury operations from Quantum to SAP S/4HANA, and whether a change in scope should be requested in order to bring Treasury operations into the ERP Project.

Recommendation


Background & Context

Quantum

Quantum is an application owned by FIS, as is a common application in the market to manage Treasury operations.

The Quantum system was implemented for Treasury operations in 2023 ????, and the existing 5 year license expires in 2028????.  

  • The Treasury organisation are unsatisfied with the Quantum system functionality and the support from FIS is also unsatisfactory.
  • Dissatisfaction with FIS, the supplier of Quantum, due to operational challenges and support issues.
    The current treasury processes are heavily reliant on manual interventions and face significant challenges due to system limitations and supplier issues.
     


S/4HANA

The Treasury Operation modules in S/4HANA are;

  1. TRM: Treasury Risk Management
  2. CM:  Financial Cash Management

A scope review was performed to determine whether S/4HANA has the functionality to manage Syensqo Treasury activities. The outcome of the review highlighted that SAP has a high fit level, along with the opportunities to make improvements. 

INSERT TABLE FOR INSTRUMENTS


License Costs

Quantum

SAP ECC (existing Licenses utilised by Treasury)


S/4HANA

  • TRM License Cost:  300k upfront, plus 73k annual maintenance fee.
  • CM License Cost: 


Implementation Costs

Quantum: Cost to improvement and close gaps

S/4HANA Implementation Cost
Example:   3.5 FTEs over 36 months.





Assumptions

Additional review and assessment will be conducted for the implementation timing after the decision of the KDD is concluded.  However, it is assumed that if Treasury operations are to transition to S\4HANA, it will likely occur beyond the group 1 go-live.  

Constraints


Impacts

If Treasury operations are to transition to S\4HANA, the intercompany loans will transition fully to TRM.  There is an integration impact on IHB, and the associated loans with the affiliates. 

Business Rules

Not applicable at this point of the decision making process

Options considered

Option A: Continue Treasury Operations activities in Quantum as-is


Option B: Continue Treasury Operations activities in Quantum, but set-up a project to improve the functionality


Option C: Transition from Quantum to S\4HANA as part of the ERP Rebuild project 


Option D: 


Evaluation



Option A

Option B
Option C
Option D
Criterion 1

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

Criterion 2

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(minus)Con

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(minus)Con

Criterion 3(plus)Pro(minus)Con(minus)Con(plus)Pro

See also


No files shared here yet.

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 2) May 20, 2025 13:12 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 124 May 20, 2025 13:11 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha formatting updates and alignment
v. 123 May 19, 2025 08:37 ZAPONNE-ext, Antonio
v. 122 May 16, 2025 17:31 DANKIR-ext, Soukaina
v. 121 May 16, 2025 11:32 ZAPONNE-ext, Antonio
v. 120 May 16, 2025 11:26 ZAPONNE-ext, Antonio
v. 119 May 16, 2025 11:24 ZAPONNE-ext, Antonio
v. 118 May 06, 2025 11:24 ZAPONNE-ext, Antonio
v. 117 May 06, 2025 06:21 ZAPONNE-ext, Antonio
v. 116 May 05, 2025 04:57 ZAPONNE-ext, Antonio

Go to Page History

Workflow history

Title Last Updated By Updated Status  
There are no pages at the moment.

  • No labels