You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 19 Next »

Status

  Approved

OwnerROWLINSON-ext, Kerry 
Stakeholders
Jira Request ID

ERP-243 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Jira Development ID

ERP-256 - Getting issue details... STATUS

High- Level Specification

ParameterValue
Application SystemSAP ECC PF2, SAP ECC WP2
Business Process Reference03.04.04.01. Manage Outline Agreements (R2)

Functional Overview

Icertis Contract Intelligence is the contract management and authoring application for Syensqo's purchase contracts. Purchase orders are created in SAP ECC with reference to purchase contracts (outline agreements). The key information from the legal contract which is relevant for procurement forms the basis of the purchase contract or outline agreement in SAP ECC.  The integration between Icertis and SAP ECC for release 2 is a custom table in SAP ECC to hold key header field content from Icertis (ERP-260 Integration Process - Icertis to SAP ECC Contract Data Replication & ERP-261 System Interface - Icertis Contract Data Replication to SAP ECC). This custom table supports the main objectives:

  1. To enable a relationship between the Icertis Agreement Code and the SAP outline agreement number.
  2. To report where there are inconsistencies in the data between the two systems.

This enhancement is to provide a convenient method for the users to update the SAP outline agreements with their corresponding Icertis Agreement Code numbers. A custom field to hold the ICM Agreement Code has been defined in ERP-259 Enhancement for Storage of Icertis ID on OA Header.  

Scope and Objectives

For one purchase contract in Icertis, there can be multiple outline agreements created in SAP ECC (one per relevant purchasing organization). The Icertis Agreement Code is to be entered on the header of each outline agreement. This can be done during the creation of each one, or via ME32K Change Outline Agreement after creation and one outline agreement at a time. This enhancement allows for all the outline agreements associated to the same Icertis Contract to be updated at the same time. The program will also allow the mass update of different ICM Agreement Codes on multiple outline agreements via the batch processing of a spreadsheet file.

The intended business process is for all new outline agreements created in SAP ECC after the introduction of Icertis Contract Management to be assigned to the respective Icertis legal contract via the entry of the ICM Agreement Code on the header when the outline agreement is created. Currently active outline agreements exist in SAP ECC which may not have a signed legal contract, and many outline agreements have an open-ended validity period which makes it difficult to determine which outline agreements are relevant to be migrated to S/4 HANA.

To assist with the process of identifying outline agreements which have been verified for migration, this enhancement will provide an additional field on the header to allow the classification of the outline agreement for migration without a legal contract, or not for migration. In conjunction with the ICM Agreement Code field content, this additional field will be able to be filled for one or more agreements via this update program. The population of this field will assist Syensqo to categorize outline agreements:

  • which have been verified as not having a current legal contract but require migration to S/4 HANA
  • which have been verified to not be migrated
  • which still require verification for migration or not, and association to an Icertis agreement

The categorization of outline agreements in this way will assist in the management of activities relating to the migration of outline agreements to S/4 HANA. Agreements which have already been categorized as 'not for migration' or 'migrate without a legal contract' can be identified on the report of outline agreements without an ICM contract (ERP-503 Consolidation Report Icertis SAP ECC Outline Agreements - Story) to avoid repeat analysis of them. From a business process point of view, it is recommended that users enter a more detailed reason in an internal text for the required omission of a legal contract.

Both the ICM Agreement Code and the OA Verification fields are available to update via the standard mass maintenance transaction for outline agreements (MEMASSCONTRACT). However, mass maintenance is more complex, makes available the mass update of all header and line-item fields, and is mostly used only by GBS for specific outline agreement changes. This custom developed transaction will make updates to these two fields only in a user-friendly, low-risk format.

For the correction of other key data in SAP ECC which is not aligned with Icertis, the existing upload programs for change outline agreement can be used, or the contract can be changed directly in transaction ME32K.



Process Flow Diagram

Step

Description

System

Comment

1

Consolidation report for purchase contracts is executed in BW

BW

Report shows entries in the custom table in ECC for Icertis purchase contracts and their assignment to outline agreements in SAP ECC, as well as outline agreements not assigned an ICM Agreement Code.

2

Complete search for legal Icertis purchase contract corresponding to outline agreement

SAP ECC & Icertis

Outline Agreements without an Icertis Agreement Code are analyzed to determine if there is a legal contract in Icertis which should be assigned on the outline agreement. 

3Update the outline agreement with the Icertis Agreement CodeSAP ECCThe update program is used to enter the Icertis agreement code on the header of each of the relevant outline agreements
4Update the verification indicator on the outline agreementSAP ECCIf the outline agreement does not have a corresponding Icertis Agreement, the verification indicator is set either (i) migration without Icertis agreement  or (ii) not to be migrated









Assumptions

Dependencies

Security, Integrity and Controls


Configuration Requirements

Language Requirements

Special Requirements


Design Rationale

Functional Requirements

jlkjl


ICM Agreement CodeOA VerificationMeaning
BlankBlankNo Icertis Agreement Code has been assigned to the OA, and no verification of whether the OA is to be migrated.
ICM CodeBlankIf Icertis Contract is assigned, assumption is that OA is relevant for migration. (Cleansing tasks may still be outstanding)
Blank01 Verified Without ICM ContractNo Icertis legal contract for the OA, but OA is required for migration to S/4
Blank

Proposed Technology to Use

Data Source Considerations

TableField NameComments/Calculation/Field Manipulation











Data Validation Considerations

TableField NameComments/Calculation/Field Manipulation













Custom Tables

Master Data

FieldDescriptionData Type/LengthValidation rule/ Value Help









Configuration Table

FieldDescriptionData Type/LengthValidation rule/ Value Help

OA Validation2 char

01 Verified without ICM Contract

02 Do Not Migrate





Selection Screen Enhancement

Field NameDescription

Select:

Data Type/LengthDefault Value/ Validation rule/ Value HelpSelection Logic













Processing Logic


Volumetrics


Performance Considerations



Error Handling


Testing

How to Test

Test Conditions and Expected Results

IDConditionExpected Result










Test Considerations/Dependencies


Other Information


Development Details

Package

Package NameParent Package




Enhancement Implementation

Enhancement TypeStandard Definition NameCustom Implementation NameDesign Rationale Reference









Other Development Objects

Object TypeObject NamePurpose/High Level LogicDesign Rationale Reference








Appendix

Custom Authorization Group Naming Convention

This table is based on the Syensqo development standards document. It provides the naming conventions for authorization groups to associated with custom reports and tables to comply with security requirements.

ABAP

ZFIZMMZPSZCOZSDZBCZFIZCA
TABLESZFITZMMTZPSTZCOTZSDTZBCTZFITZCAT

See also


No files shared here yet.

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 19) Apr 07, 2026 05:27 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 39 Mar 23, 2026 08:56 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 38 Mar 23, 2026 07:36 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 37 Mar 23, 2026 07:23 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 36 Mar 23, 2026 05:45 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 35 Mar 23, 2026 05:18 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 34 Mar 20, 2026 15:38 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 33 Mar 20, 2026 12:21 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 32 Mar 20, 2026 11:39 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry
v. 31 Mar 20, 2026 11:00 ROWLINSON-ext, Kerry

Go to Page History

  • No labels