MULLER, Guillaume Find Accenture workshop/assessment

Global Feedback

Too much freedom regarding the technical solution

Lack to monitor Accenture

Battery Feedback

Since November 2021

Good 


Bad


Failed to accelerate with Accenture

  • Accenture, not expert in their domain (Junior and learning at the same time on ELN)
  • Business was not dedicated to take enough requirements
  • 4 months: tight deadlines
  • In the end: No delivery, bad quality

Coatings Feedback

Good

  • Good basis for Tableau and ELN (only about the visible part)
  • Needs gathering and understanding
  • Harmonization of some practices about EP → Development of a Global GSheets
  • Reactive people developers because full time on the project: we saw the developments day by day
  • 40%, 20%

Bad

  • Not ready on R&I side: didn't know what was possible or exactly what we wanted.
  • Non expert developers and several developers for the same tool → everyone did something different and they were no consistence between all the ELN templates within Coatings domain
  • Development not done the best way → not good development practice, poor data model with aberrant keys, a lot of actions and custom tables in Tableau,... (impossible to build on top, tried and created bugs)
  • Almost no documentation provided
  • No communication with the other domains (Batteries & Materials) → No harmonization
  • Always tried to negotiate about our needs, what we want, etc.
  • Had a contract to follow: useless and non valuable things were done (US device connection) instead of valuable things.
  • Too much noise: always involved everyone from Solvay in all the e-mails/meetings → people didn't know when it was important to read/come, so at the end not a lot of implication + it led to less productive meetings.
  • Bad user adoption/training: planed to train people, etc. but didn't do it.
  • Beta-testing: Asked to complete Excel files with no value (only format, colors... that they could have checked on their own) just to have a validation, but didn't take into account important feedbacks.
  • Everything was always urgent "for yesterday", so we weren't able to identify real urgent things from the others.
  • Not usable tools at the end.

Materials Feedback



  • No labels