You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Status

  Approved

OwnerFRUTEAU-ext, Sabrina 
Stakeholders
Jira Request ID ERP-1018 - Getting issue details... STATUS


Jira Development ID

ERP-714 - Getting issue details... STATUS

High- Level Specification

ParameterValue
Application System

SAP S/4HANA - CUI instanceSAP S/4HANA - China instance

SAP S/4HANA - Rest of World instance
Business Process Reference

Functional Overview

This functional specification defines the custom development required to automatically replicate specific PPM Item User Statuses to linked PS Project and WBS Element User Statuses.
The enhancement ensures that when an Item in PPM is updated to statuses: TECO/Cancelled, Closed/Cancelled or On Hold, the corresponding PS User Status is automatically set on the associated Project Definition.


Scope and Objectives

Standard PPM to PS integration (via DFM configuration) supports mapping PPM Item Status to PS System Status only.
Since Cancelled and On Hold are User Statuses in PS, standard functionality cannot be used, requiring custom development.



Process Flow Diagram


Step

Description

Comment

1

Trigger: User changes of PPM Item Status to:

    • TECO/Cancelled or
    • Closed/Cancelled or
    • On Hold
Upon saving, the PPM item status is updated. 
2

System triggers the status change on the corresponding SAP PS project to Cancelled or On Hold. 

Item changed to status On Hold => PS project status changed to On Hold

Item changed to status TECO/Cancelled =>

  • PS project system status updated to TECO via DFM
  • PS project user status updated Cancelled via custom program

Item changed to status Closed/Cancelled =>

  • PS project system status updated to Closed via DFM
  • PS project user status updated Cancelled via custom program
3

User changes the PPM item status from On hold to Approved. 

The system removed status On Hold on the corresponding PS project. 


4

User changes the PPM item status from TECO/Cancelled  to Closed/Cancelled.

PS project system status updated to Closed via DFM



5

User changes the PPM item status from TECO/Cancelled  to TECO.

The system removed status Cancelled on the corresponding PS project. 


6

User changes the PPM item status from Closed/Cancelled  to TECO/Cancelled.

PS project system status updated to TECO via DFM.



Assumptions


Dependencies

PPM item status configuration defined.

DFM configuration to synchronize PPM item status with SAP PS project system status.

SAP PS user statuses Cancelled and On Hold defined. 

Security, Integrity and Controls


Configuration Requirements

Language Requirements

Special Requirements


Design Rationale

Functional Requirements

  1. Automatic Synchronization

When a user sets the Item Status in PPM to one of the below statuses:

  • TECO/Cancelled 
  • Closed/Cancelled
  • On Hold

,The corresponding PS Project and its WBS Elements must automatically receive the corresponding PS User Status. 

PPM is the controlling application. Users must not manually adjust the PS status for these cases.

The solution must ensure aligned user statuses between PPM and PS at all times.

The update must occur:

  • Immediately upon Item status change
  • With error logging and alerting in case of failures

2. Reversibility

If the PPM item status is changed from On Hold, TECO/Cancelled or Closed/Cancelled to another allowed status as per PPM configuration, the status change must be reflected on the SAP PS project: 

PPM item status From ToExpected results
On HoldApprovedCustom program deactivate user status On Hold on PS Project
On HoldTECOCustom program deactivate user status On Hold on PS Project
TECO/CancelledTECOCustom program deactivate user status Cancelled on PS Project
TECO/CancelledClosed/CancelledHandled by DFM configuration. 
Closed/CancelledTECO/CancelledHandled by DFM configuration. 


Proposed Technology to Use

Data Source Considerations

TableField NameComments/Calculation/Field Manipulation











Data Validation Considerations

TableField NameComments/Calculation/Field Manipulation













Custom Tables

Master Data

FieldDescriptionData Type/LengthValidation rule/ Value Help









Configuration Table

FieldDescriptionData Type/LengthValidation rule/ Value Help








Selection Screen Enhancement

Field NameDescription

Select:

Data Type/LengthDefault Value/ Validation rule/ Value HelpSelection Logic













Processing Logic



Volumetrics


Performance Considerations



Error Handling


Testing

How to Test

Test Conditions and Expected Results

IDConditionExpected Result










Test Considerations/Dependencies


Other Information


Development Details

Package

Package NameParent Package




Enhancement Implementation

Enhancement TypeStandard Definition NameCustom Implementation NameDesign Rationale Reference









Other Development Objects

Object TypeObject NamePurpose/High Level LogicDesign Rationale Reference








Appendix

Custom Authorization Group Naming Convention

This table is based on the Syensqo development standards document. It provides the naming conventions for authorization groups to associated with custom reports and tables to comply with security requirements.

ABAP

ZFIZMMZPSZCOZSDZBCZFIZCA
TABLESZFITZMMTZPSTZCOTZSDTZBCTZFITZCAT

See also


No files shared here yet.

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 5) Jan 13, 2026 07:44 TORRES-ext, Benedict
v. 20 Jan 12, 2026 18:02 FRUTEAU-ext, Sabrina
v. 19 Jan 08, 2026 11:24 FRUTEAU-ext, Sabrina
v. 18 Jan 08, 2026 11:09 TORRES-ext, Benedict
v. 17 Jan 08, 2026 07:11 INAMDAR-ext, Dig Vijay
v. 16 Jan 06, 2026 09:46 FRUTEAU-ext, Sabrina
v. 15 Jan 06, 2026 09:46 FRUTEAU-ext, Sabrina
v. 14 Dec 15, 2025 08:37 FRUTEAU-ext, Sabrina
v. 13 Dec 12, 2025 09:43 FRUTEAU-ext, Sabrina
v. 12 Dec 09, 2025 13:35 FRUTEAU-ext, Sabrina

Go to Page History

  • No labels