Consistency checks to be made before validating a “PIF level” profit center : if one of these conditions is not met, we need to challenge / reject the request

STEP 1

Check the consistency between the data present in the code, in the short name and in the long description

 

STEP 2

Check that the Reporting Division is within the validity dates in table ZZR_REPO_DIV

 

STEP 3

In the table view ZZRT179V control that:

  • The “ Flag PIF ” is ticked,

  • The PIF is not deleted - The description of Product hierarchy can't contain *D*,

  • The validity period  - We cannot have profit centers at higher / lower levels of the hierarchy than the PIF
 
 

STEP 4

Check the Business area assignment in the production plant is consistent with the Reporting division present in the profit center, in table view V_134G :

  • Plant = plant code where the material is going to be extended. If it's a production plant you can check its validity via transaction ZPRI,


  • Product division = the one corresponding to the PIF, in table view ZZRT179V,


  • The Business area indicated in view V_134G must be consistent with the Reporting division of the profit center.


STEP 5

Check that the other profit centers for the same PIF are linked to the same or other Reporting divisions.

Taking into account that they are exceptions, such as for  PIF U* for utilities which can be assigned to several reporting divisions, as well as some product lines for which there are several Reporting divisions (e.g. chlorovinyls Russia <> Thailand <> Mercosur)

 





 

  • No labels