Status

PENDING DECISION

Owner

Jean-Baptist Lanneluc

Stakeholders

Steering Committee


Decision: 

Decision made by: 

Date:  

Online Meeting: 

Issue

Potential network saturation on Day 1 post‑migration (GWS → M365) due to Outlook Fat Client initial sync/download of large volumes of emails and attachments.

Recommendation

Option 1: Outlook: 1 month data & 50% bandwidth download; OneDrive: 50% bandwidth upload

There are 2 actions need to be taken:
- Optimize applications to reduce the amount of data
- Apply bandwidth limitations to these applications for Day 1

The 2 applications mentioned are mostly OneDrive and Outlook.
- On Day 1, Outlook downloads 1 year of emails and attatchments locally
- While OneDrive uploads the content of the folders "Documents", "Desktop" and "Images" to OneDrive.

Background & Context

On the first business day after cutover of each Wave, many users will perform an initial synchronization of their mailboxes in Outlook fat client.

With the current setup this can trigger massive simultaneous downloads of historical emails and attachments from M365.

Assumptions

  • This will not impact all users, only E5 with corporate device and fat client of Outlook,
  • Outlook is configured to download mailbox content including attachments,
  • Network capacity is not dimensioned for a “mass concurrent bulk download” event, so congestion may occur and impact other business-critical traffic.

Constraints

  • Users still need to access these appliations for their business requirements, so the bandwidth limitation needs to be reasonable.

Impacts

Network / Service impact

  • Network saturation at sites and internet breakouts due to thousands of clients downloading mailbox content (emails + attachments) while simultaneously uploading user folders to OneDrive.
  • Degraded performance or outages for other business-critical traffic (Teams meetings/voice/video, intranet/SaaS apps, ERP, VDI/Citrix), especially during morning peak.
  • Higher risk of bottlenecks on VPN for remote users, potentially making remote access unstable.

End-user impact

  • Outlook becomes slow/unresponsive during initial caching (long “Updating mailbox” / “Trying to connect”), delayed send/receive, attachments opening slowly.
  • OneDrive sync backlogs: long time until Desktop/Documents/Pictures are fully available in the cloud; users may see “sync pending” and missing files on other devices.
  • More file conflicts/duplicates if users edit files while large sync is still in progress.

Support / operational impact

  • Spike in service desk tickets (Outlook slowness, mailbox not fully visible, “missing emails”, OneDrive not syncing, Teams call quality issues).
  • Harder troubleshooting because the root cause is shared congestion; issues appear “random” across multiple applications.
  • Potential need for emergency controls (ad-hoc throttling/blocks) during business hours, which is typically more disruptive than planned limits.

Options considered

Option 1: Outlook: 1 month data & 50% bandwidth download; OneDrive: 50% bandwidth upload

Option 2: Outlook: 3 months data & 50% bandwidth download; OneDrive: 50% bandwidth upload

Option 3: Outlook: 1 year data & 50% bandwidth download; OneDrive: 50% bandwidth upload

Evaluation

EvaluationOption 1: Outlook: 1 month data & 50% bandwidth download; OneDrive: 50% bandwidth uploadOption 2: Outlook: 3 months data & 50% bandwidth download; OneDrive: 50% bandwidth uploadOption 3: Outlook: 1 year data & 50% bandwidth download; OneDrive: 50% bandwidth upload
Technical Feasibility(plus) OK(plus) OK

(plus) OK

User Impact

(plus) Limited network congestion on site for a short time (1 hour at most)

(minus) Users will need internet access to browse their emails beyond 1 month

yellow circle Limited network congestion on site for several hours (up to 3 hours for many sites)

(minus) Users will need internet access to browse their emails beyond 3 months

(minus) Limited network congestion on site for a full day for many sites.

(plus) Once downloaded, 1 year mails accessible from outlook without internet access.

Support Impact

yellow circle Medium: fewer “network is slow” incidents, but more end-user questions like “I can’t find older emails in Outlook” / “Search doesn’t show old mail” (they’ll need to use Outlook Online to access >1 month).

yellow circle Some tickets for how to access archives/older mail and user guidance.

(plus) Low–Medium: good balance; fewer “older mail missing” tickets than Option 1.

yellow circle Some performance/sync complaints may remain in the first hours, but generally manageable.

(minus) Medium–High: more Day‑1 slowness risk (longer caching), leading to more tickets (“Outlook stuck/slow”, “can’t send/receive”, Teams call quality issues due to congestion).

(plus) Fewer “older email missing” questions, but more performance/network-related incidents.

Operational Complexity

(minus) More change-management effort due to behavioral change for users.

yellow circle Low–Medium: same type of controls as Option 1, but less user disruption and fewer exceptions.

(plus) Standard monitoring and comms.

(minus) Medium–High: higher need for Day‑1 command center, active network monitoring, potential reactive throttling, and site-by-site troubleshooting.

(minus) More coordination with network team.

Cost

(plus) Low direct cost (configuration/policy + comms).

(plus) Low direct cost.

(plus) Low direct cost for configuration.


See also

The following section describes relevant documentation:

Repository

Description

M365 - Outlook BW Consumption per site
Document describing the amount of data to be downloaded by Outlook clients per site, as well as the time it would take for all users to download their data if 100% of the bandwidth was allocated to Outlook.





Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 5) Apr 29, 2026 19:48 CHUDZIAK-ext, Aleksander
v. 4 Apr 28, 2026 12:34 CHUDZIAK-ext, Aleksander
v. 3 Apr 28, 2026 10:49 CHUDZIAK-ext, Aleksander
v. 2 Apr 28, 2026 10:02 CHUDZIAK-ext, Aleksander
v. 1 Apr 27, 2026 20:01 CHUDZIAK-ext, Aleksander

  • No labels