You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 81 Next »

Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

Note: For all sheets to explore who owns the sheet and how it is maintained

Clean the fieklds which are 

Customer related attribute requirements 


Target model dimension Requirements DescriptionCommentExisting source in transparency Technical name in transparency source (mainly BW)→ table name and attribute name Transformation/Rules for  transparency dashboardSF source Comment about SF  Searching in BW (meeting with Anon & Saint)
CustomerCustomer ID 


Identified with PRS Code, RCS Code, SAP Code or SF Code

SAP BW/SF 




table ACCOUNT in CORE

Fact table Parent ID =  Customer group ID 



 A customer might not have any parent 


To investigate further to have one rule

SAP BW / File

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001

To be confirmed by Ayoub and Franck

Identified with file 1zicl5VUcl1NyDLGZXQRDmQypY0-uwc4yUtuPRu1scxU . Group Mapping

By mapping with the GBU and C_SOLDID

If no match, then take

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SOLDID . C_CORPGR


For Ship-To, take

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SHIPID . TXTLG

If composed, take the name after "/"

table ACCOUNT:

Available in CORE and iCare 

ParentID
Fact tableShip to IDSAP code for customer to whom Solvay is shipping the products 


QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001

QV_BW_QRY_MVSDSO61_0001

QV_BW_QRY_CPCOPC07_0001

[C_SHIPID] Ship_to_party

Key_[C_SHIPID].[2C_SHIPID]


The attributes in the CORE in the table ACCOUNT 

Partner_Sub_type


There is no relation between the ship to and sold to in SF 
fact tableSold to ID  SAP code for customer to whom Solvay is selling the products






Fact table Ship to KA ID 

Final customer that receives the product.  (it can be blank→ it is different than ship to mentioned above) 


Currently in transparency it has been received  from P&L query 




C_GBR15 = ship-to-KA

Fact tableFinal consignee ID =Ship to KA ID Only SpP related. 




C_CUSTID__0CUS_F_CONS

not sure

Customer Sales rep ID 

It is linked to account reccording 


QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001

Identified with

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . Sales_Employee__Sold_to__E_Mail_Address__Key_

Or

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . Sales_Employee__Ship_to__E_Mail_Address__Key_



In CORE, Sales Rep (CSR Customer Service  Representative)  and account manger master data available in ACCOUNTTEAMMEMBER  → attributes: Account ID, USER, Team member role (coming from SAP).

One account can be managed by several GBUs so there is a one to many relation between account and CSR

In icare it is different. 

Master data of Sales rep and account manger are in SAP. The data flows daily basis to SF per GBU. This info are coming from sales area of the SAP side. Related to sales area in SAP. 

??When data integrated from SAP to SF, there are rules to make it at GBU level 

Sales Employee (Sold-to)_[C_CUSTSAL__C_SALEMP]

Table: /BIC/MC_CUSTSAL

containing the sales rep  belonging to a sales area (sales area is a combination of division, distribution channel, organization) 

Sales repSales rep name 






Table name: 

Sales repSales rep email







Customer Customer Short name 



QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SOLDID . TXTSH

Or

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SHIPID . TXTSH




Customer Customer Long name 



QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SOLDID . TXTLG

Or

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SHIPID . TXTLG




CustomerCountry 

Country ship to: Country of the customer delivered

----------

Country sold to: Country of the sold-to company- Invoice party

Country is available in SF and BW. In case of discrepancy, SF is more reliable 

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001

QV_BW_QRY_MVSDSO61_0001

QV_BW_QRY_CPCOPC07_0001

----------------

QV_BW_QRY_MVSDSO61_0001

Country (Key)_[C_SHIPID].[20COUNTRY]

[4CPCOPA03-SHIP_COUNTRY] Country of destination

[10COUNTRY] Ship-to party > Country (Name)

C_SHTCTRY

------------

Country (Name)_[C_SOLDID].[10COUNTRY]


"[0COUNTRY] Country if empty => [C_SHIPTID] Ship-to party\Attributes\[0COUNTRY] Country key"

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SOLDID . 0COUNTRY

Or

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SHIPID . 0COUNTRY




Customer Zone 

Naming unificationn has been defined in transparency dashboard (see the transformation column) 

From one GBU to another zone might be different. It has been unified 


GBU Ship-to zone (BW) 1_[4CPCOPA03-TGB2_ZONEH1]

Mapping on QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . Sold_to_party_Geographie_Zone__Key_

Or

Mapping on QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . Ship_to_party_Geographie_Zone__Key_


image.png

available in SF 

What table?



CustomerPRS code 

SF 


Account . RCS_code_Account__c


In CORE, there is PRS=PF1 (PRS ID) , RCS = WP1 (RCS ID) . (other ERP ID). Available in ACCOUNT table.

To check→ in SAP it happens that there are two accounts for one customer. For example if customer change the VAT, a new account will be created. In SF it doesn't happen so that there is no one to one from SF to SAP. In such a case, the new account is replaced but all the changes in SAP are tracked an another attribute  (PRS_ID_history) .

Note: 

In general to track the changes in an attributes in SF,  ACCOUNTHISTORY is the table that include historical and changes of the records.  

Example, if a customer number change, the new one is in the main table and the old number is backed up in ACCOUNTHISTORY table. 



/BIC/MC_CUSTID-/BIC/C_CUSTPRS

it is used to link PF1 and WP1

CustomerRCS code 

SF bothAccount . PRS_Code_Account__c
Refer to RCS code comment 
nothing 
CustomerSAP code 

SF both?/SAP


Account . SAP_Sold_To_Number__c

Or

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SOLDID

Or

QVSBS_BW_QRY_CPCOPA03_0001 . C_SHIPID

Refer to RCS code comment 
customer ID 
Customer SF code

All the above codes are available in SF but the doubt/question is that if for a new customer, the corresponding data is available right away in the SF so that we won't have a gap when using SF as the source. It is also to check if data is available in both SF (icare and Core)

Currently in the transparency dash all the codes are from SF but it is better o explore if there is a better source. 

SFAccount . Id


there is no track in BW
CustomerAccount manager 

Account manager and sales rep are both are solvay employee. The data at the target application is used at CPC level. 

The info are available in all data sources but the challenge is that there are different values from one to another. 

It has been prioritized for Q4


It is only for iCare not for CORE

SFAccount . Owner_Name__c

Refer to Sales rep ID comment

combination of sales area, division, and distribution channel defined for a GBU. 



?
Customer Team cluster

Only in iCare  and should be empty for CORE

Franck comment: 

Three ways to get the data

  • (Preferred solution) API 
  • SF function to get the data
  • (not preferred alternative) Googlesheet for mapping (only used for iCare)

1NVHMJOTRYA3tR7Pf6HCirAJb2ik7JCRD5b2CrLnSVuc


Note: it is used to get the market cluster (link with market cluster)

SF

Using API for

Account . Team_Cluster__c



This concept is only available in iCare. it is a way in in SpP to associate an account to a team (Sales team?)

Corresponding concept in CORE might be BU (to check)


Notes:

-Team cluster refers to the sales team in Solvay that handles an account. It is a way to associate an account to a sales team in solvay. Each sales team handles a specific (market) like automotive. battery, etc.  One account might be purchasing from various teams. in that case, team cluster is the one with the biggest sale.  → that makes the Market cluster different from team cluster. 

?
MarketGBU customer segment A customer receiving different service levels could be classified as KA for one GBU and Standard for other. Exceptions: GSKA- they remain GSKA for all GBUs. 

COPA03

The Gsheet below is used for this field as well 

technical name: GBU Segm. (Sold-to)_[C_CUSTSAL__0CUST_GRP2]

Customer_Sales_Area_Customer_group_2__Name_


 In CORE, the table name is  GBU_CUSTOMER_SEGMENTATION .

GBU customer segmentation shows what GBUs are related to an account. There is one GBU segmentation per account for a GBU 

C_CUSTAL


Customer Group customer segment

It refers to Solvay group level of segmentation for customer. Depends on the service level a customer receives from Solvay, it can be classified as KA, or standard, etc. 

The same customer segmentation can be applied at GBU level (below) 

only in BW 


COPA03 Sold_to_party_Group_Segm___Corp___Name_

and


COPA03 Sold_to_party_Group_Segm___Corp___Name_

check if the field: 

if it contains "not assigned" or is empty, we display "Not Assigned"


Then use the mapping file to clean the values of the field retrieved from COPA

Colors in the mapping file is should have for transparency dashboard 

Note: For all sheets to explore who owns the sheet and how it is maintained

Bus_Rank__Corp_

Group Segm. (Corp) (Name)_[C_SOLDID].[1C_CUSTGRC]

Special rule:

strategic ley account at group level are enforced to be strategic account for all GBU 

child account are following the parent account for GBU and group segmentation both (there are exceptions that can be specified by users)  

it is not available in SF 

  • No labels