Glossary

Issue

Many SAP standard reports commonly used for Tax Reporting purposes in SAP ECC have run out of SAP support and have been replaced with reports in the Document and Reporting Compliance (DRC) framework available in S/4 HANA. The usage of SAP DRC in S/4 HANA has implications on licensing requirements as well as other project considerations such as training needs and business process change and shall therefore be assessed further as part of this KDD.

Recommendation

To ensure continuity of regulatory compliance in S/4 HANA for statutory submissions and to provide the users with a powerful, intuitive and state-of-the-art tax reporting frameworks, a move towards SAP DRC seems inevitable. Sticking to an obsolete and outdated tax reporting framework which has already reached or is nearing the end of their lives from a SAP support and product development perspective in a new S/4 HANA implementation is heavily contradicting the idea of building a future-proof solution.

Background & Context

SAP DRC in S/4 HANA for statutory reporting purposes is a powerful tool that facilitates monitoring, preparation and submission of numerous statutory reports to government and fiscal authorities but many of its functionalities require additional licensing.

Syensqo is currently using various tax applications for compliance, reporting and lodging purposes. While some of these applications allow for seamless integration with SAP as the source system for regulatory filings and reporting, the business is still relying on supporting reports from the underlying SAP transactional accounting system especially in countries where no automated or only semi-automated solutions are in place for tax reporting and submissions. In a growing number of countries around the world it is nowadays also a legal requirement to integrate the accounting system with government portals for direct submissions of statutory filings to the authorities (e.g. 'Make Tax Digital' initiative in the UK for indirect tax submissions).

Assumptions

Constraints

Impacts

Business Rules

Options considered

Option A: 

Option B: 

Option C: 

Option D: 

Evaluation

	Option A	Option B	Option C	Option D
Criterion 1	Pro Con	Pro Pro	Pro Con	Pro Con
Criterion 2	Pro Con	Con	Pro Pro	Con Con
Criterion 3	Pro	Con	Con	Pro

See also

Change log

Workflow history