You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Next »

Status

  Approved

OwnerBECHTER-ext, Alex 
Stakeholders

Issue

Document Splitting is a functionality which allows an organization to report complete and sound Financial Statements at a lower level than the company code out of SAP in real-time. Introducing document splitting brings about substantial benefits for business users from a reporting perspective but also increases the complexity of the solution as strict data integrity checks are being performed by the system for Financial Accounting documents to ensure that the principle of zero-balanced Financial Accounting documents and consequently also Financial Statements at the level of the defined splitting criteria (e.g. Profit Centre) is never broken in the system at any given point in time.

Switching on document splitting in a live environment requires data migration activities which can be quite complex and time-consuming. Switching on document splitting also has implications on integrated modules and data migration activities so it is advisable to decide on the usage of document splitting upfront in a greenfield project.

This KDD is therefore evaluating the pros and cons of using document splitting in the to-be solution to be built on S/4 HANA and a recommendation will be given on the preferred setup considering various aspects of the project charter.

Recommendation

With Syensqo being a publicly listed company, compliance with IFRS reporting standards is a legal requirement for the company. IAS8 mandates segmental reporting for companies to be fully IFRS-compliant in their external reporting to the markets. The state-of-the-art tool in S/4 HANA to support segmental reporting requirements out of the system is 'Document Splitting'.

Furthermore, the activation of document splitting at a later stage once a company code is in productive use in an S/4 HANA system with potentially multiple ledgers, valuations and parallel currencies is a complex endeavor and requires deep technical and functional expertise and heavy involvement of business users for reconciliation purposes. The challenges in terms of integration and data migration are manageable but needs to be factored into the designs and approaches.

The recommended option is therefore 'Option A - Activate Document Splitting in S/4 HANA'.

Background & Context

In response to segmental reporting requirements IFRS imposed on companies required to report its Financials in accordance with the rules and regulations stipulated in the IAS framework, SAP developed a functionality which allows companies to produce complete and fully-compliant Financial Statements in the system at a different level than the company code (e.g. at Segment or Profit Centre level) which removed a major constraint from legacy SAP systems in terms of reporting capabilities for many SAP customers around the world. This functionality has been labeled and marketed by SAP under the name 'Document Splitting' since its initial launch in the early 2000s.

Document splitting relies first and foremost on the definition of so called zero-balancing reporting criteria/characteristics - these are reporting dimensions below the company code at which the system supports the creation of zero-balanced and fully auditable Financial Statements. Commonly used dimensions used as zero-balancing reporting criteria are 'Profit Centre' or 'Segment', for example.

Document splitting at its core is a General Ledger solution and is fully compatible with the parallel ledger approach introduced in the new General Ledger Accounting solution meaning once enabled it will ensure the same level of data consistency across all active ledgers in the General Ledger Accounting module (leading and non-leading ledgers). To assure these levels of consistency and reporting accuracy across the General Ledger, the system is forced to apply more stringent data integrity checks for all transactional data updating the ledgers. The system needs to be able to derive or inherit the zero-balancing characteristics for each and every line item in the accounting document. This can be achieved via document splitting rules, built-in inheritance functionalities or ideally via explicit data provisioning of the zero-balancing characteristics from the sending applications.

Example of a Financial Accounting document where document splitting balances out an outgoing invoice based on the revenue account assignment objects (Profit Centre) which is defined as zero-balancing reporting characteristic in the system:

Example of a Financial Accounting document where document splitting completes a Financial Accounting document through inheritance of the zero-balancing reporting characteristic:

To ensure document splitting runs smoothly and delivers the desired outcomes with minimal disruptions to business processes in S/4 HANA, master data objects in the sending applications may need to be enriched to ensure that the system is able to derive the correct zero-balancing characteristics to be used for the Financial Accounting transaction across all business processes used in the system (please refer to section 'Impact' for further details on this aspect). Strict master data governance is also key after the initial implementation to ensure that document splitting is not causing disruptions to ongoing business operations.

Document Splitting requires careful assessment of all types of documents posted in the system to ensure that the correct base items are identified for splitting the respective balance sheet items. While this is relatively straight-forward for Accounts Payable (Accounts Payable is typically split based on the expense/GRIR legs of the document) and Accounts Receivable (Accounts Receivable is typically split based on revenue legs available in the document), other parts of the Balance Sheet may not require splitting at all (e.g. Tax is often a corporate function and doesn't require a split by zero-balancing characteristic used in the corresponding expense/revenue lines) or require a more complicated splitting rule to deliver the required outcome (e.g. cross-company postings often require special configurations especially if sub-ledger accounts are used as I/C clearing lines). This process of identifying all posting scenarios and determining the correct splitting rules for each scenario is relatively time-consuming and must be addressed early in the detailed design phase of a project.

Assumptions

  • Data conversion approach will be greenfield using a posting approach to transactional Finance data into S/4 HANA.

Constraints

  • Should the data conversion approach be an S/4 HANA conversion instead of a greenfield conversion using a posting approach, this may need to be revisited.

Impacts

Infrastructure: No impact - Document Splitting is part of the standard S/4 licensing package.

Basis/Security: No impact - no business functions or add-ons need to be installed. Likewise no special requirements arise from a Security perspective.

ABAP/Technical: No impact - Document Splitting is a SAP standard functionality that allows for flexible configurations to cater to various business scenarios.

Data Migration / Data Cleansing:

  • Material Master: All materials must be be assigned to a profit centre in S/4 HANA.
  • Open POs: All stock POs must be migrated with a profit centre maintained in EKPO.
  • Projects: All migrated WBS elements must be tagged to a profit centre and responsible or requesting cost centre.
  • Fixed Assets: All Fixed Assets must be tagged to a cost centre, also Assets under Construction.

HCM: As per recommendation by SAP, document splitting for payroll postings should occur upstream within the HCM module. This requires the activation of liability splitting functionalities which must be tested thoroughly to avoid adverse impacts to payroll calculations (in particular retro calculations).

Materials Management/Sales: All materials set up in the system require profit centre assignments.

Business Rules

  • All materials need to be assigned to a profit centre.

Options considered

Option A: Activate Document Splitting in S/4 HANA (with zero-balancing characteristics)

In this option, document splitting is activated by default for all entities set up in S/4 HANA with zero-balancing characteristics defined during detailed design stage. 

This gives Syensqo the ability to report complete Financial Statements at the required level of granularity to meet external Financial compliance or internal management reporting requirements at any given point in time, not just at period-end.


Option B: Disable Document Splitting in S/4 HANA


Evaluation



Option A

Option B
Option C
Option D
Criterion 1

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

Criterion 2

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(minus)Con

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(minus)Con

Criterion 3(plus)Pro(minus)Con(minus)Con(plus)Pro

See also


No files shared here yet.

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 14) Aug 20, 2024 01:37 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 44 Aug 01, 2024 07:20 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 43 Aug 01, 2024 07:18 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 42 Aug 01, 2024 07:17 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 41 Aug 01, 2024 06:30 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 40 Jul 31, 2024 13:05 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 39 Jul 31, 2024 12:52 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 38 Jul 31, 2024 10:51 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 37 Jul 31, 2024 09:09 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 36 Jul 23, 2024 14:45 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 35 Jul 23, 2024 14:41 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 34 Jul 23, 2024 14:29 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 33 Jul 19, 2024 07:31 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 32 Jul 16, 2024 11:54 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 31 Jul 16, 2024 11:21 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 30 Jul 15, 2024 07:35 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 29 Jul 15, 2024 07:33 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 28 Jul 15, 2024 07:32 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 27 Jul 15, 2024 07:29 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 26 Jul 15, 2024 07:25 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 25 Jul 15, 2024 07:24 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 24 Jul 15, 2024 07:20 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 23 Jul 15, 2024 07:14 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 22 Jul 15, 2024 06:58 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 21 Jul 12, 2024 10:53 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 20 Jul 12, 2024 08:44 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 19 Jul 12, 2024 07:53 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 18 Jul 12, 2024 07:34 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 17 Jul 12, 2024 07:13 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 16 Jul 12, 2024 07:12 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 15 Jul 12, 2024 06:28 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 14 Jul 12, 2024 06:03 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 13 Jul 12, 2024 05:42 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 12 Jul 12, 2024 04:45 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 11 Jul 12, 2024 04:18 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 10 Jul 12, 2024 02:49 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 9 Jul 12, 2024 02:33 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 8 Jul 11, 2024 10:59 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 7 Jul 11, 2024 10:21 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 6 Jul 11, 2024 10:04 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 5 Jul 11, 2024 09:54 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 4 Jul 11, 2024 07:28 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 3 Jul 11, 2024 06:48 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 2 Jul 11, 2024 04:27 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 1 Jul 11, 2024 03:33 BECHTER-ext, Alex

Workflow history

Title Last Updated By Updated Status  
There are no pages at the moment.

  • No labels