Issue

This Key Decision Document (KDD) serves as a guide outlining critical decisions, considerations and recommendations essential to the implementation and management of a Resource Scheduling solution to best support business process and incorporate the new functionalities S/4HANA will bring to Syensqo. It aims to clarify the rationale behind exploring and evaluating the following S/4HANA Maintenance Resource Scheduling in comparison to a 3rd party specialized application (TBD in detail design if recommended)

Key areas covered in this document include:

• Benefits and drawbacks of each solution, including factors such as efficiency, accuracy, safety and compliance.
• Overview & Background
• Design Options 
• Evaluation
• Recommendation
• Business & Project Impacts

Overall, the purpose and structure of the KDD ensure clarity, transparency and accountability throughout the process of adopting and utilising Resource Scheduling for EAM within Syensqo.

Recommendation

Background & Context

Syensqo is currently operating on the SAP ECC platform for its maintenance management processes, specifically using the Prometheus Graphical Work Order Scheduler (GWOS) for resource scheduling. As Syensqo transition to S/4HANA, there is an opportunity to evaluate the continuation of the current imbedded third-party scheduling tool or transition to the native S/4HANA Maintenance Resource Scheduling module.

As-Is Summary

Syensqo SAP ECC clients (WP1 & PF1) currently use Prometheus GWOS for resource scheduling. GWOS is a specialized third-party tool that provides advanced graphical work order scheduling capabilities, it operates as an add-on to the SAP ECC system.

Opportunities

Assumptions

Constraints

Impacts

Business Rules

Options considered

Option A: 

Option B: 

Option C: 

Option D: 

Evaluation

	Option A	Option B	Option C	Option D
Criterion 1	Pro Con	Pro Pro	Pro Con	Pro Con
Criterion 2	Pro Con	Con	Pro Pro	Con Con
Criterion 3	Pro	Con	Con	Pro

See also

Change log

Workflow history