| Status | Approved |
| Owner | Stefanie Schwartz |
| Stakeholders |
Issue
Long term solution post RFI implementation. Sustainability Control Towers vs non-SAP.
Recommendation
Background & Context
RFI ESG Disclosure and Performance
ESG Disclosure and Performance - SAP not mature enough with SCT (Sust Control Tower). Could be revisited in 3 years. Roadmap? SAP did not answer RFI, just off the shelf ppt. Access issues to links.
Gensuite one option. Synergies with reporting. Target state data capture and clean up close to source. May mean movin away from Gensuite to where data ownership, modelling is more frequent. Gensuite not right fit, maybe more towards Microsoft. Pilot in autumn to test automation of env metric, modelisation for data cleaning and then consume clean data on corporate level.
Shortlist of two, favourite Greenomy as short term solution so not overspend. Plug and play. Recommendation given, waiting for decision
Launch of Sustainbility Control Tower RFI, extended to SAP, SAP invited to answer. Unlikely they will be shortlisted. RFI to consolidate all sustainability data in one place, create reporting layer and insights layer on top. 1-2 year contract to revisit once ERP Rebuild is in place. Hence AS IS is a moving target. Different scope to Green Token. Demos have been presented by SAP this year to Marie with PWC. Scope, AI and insights not good enough. RFI supported by KPMG experience with other client and finalised in next days. 2.5 weeks for providers to answer by mid June. Other potential providers SAP, Gensuite, Salesforce, Microsoft (new partner AI), Simapro provider Sphera. Pure players: https://watershed.com/en-GB, https://www.cority.com/, https://figbytes.com/company/about/, Watershed.com. June/July 2023 Go-No Go decision. Syensqo IT contacts are Guillaume Muller (PM sustainability) and Mathilde Lascombes (for the AI capabilities) for now. Syensqo will involve purchasing and architecture once we have shortlisted
*Sustainability Control Tower: SAP scope, AI and insights not good enough. ESG data, elements on basic reporting using tools creating KPI library. This should be covered by SAP. Enhancement of this data SAP lacks, reporting layer e.g. KPIs, emission factors e.g. ecoinvent, ecotransit. For example carbon accounting. Pureplayers look into public data where plant data is missing, to make assumptions where there is gaps. Other functionality, AI native pureplayer is integrated benchmark. Competitors in tool for KPIs in market based on public information. SAP solution does not cover this. No company in manufacturing uses the Sustainability Control Towers.
Assumptions
Constraints
Impacts
Business Rules
Options considered
Option A:
Option B:
Option C:
Option D:
Evaluation
Option A | Option B | Option C | Option D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Criterion 2 |
|  Con |
|
|
| Criterion 3 |  Pro | Con | Con | Pro |
See also
Change log
Workflow history
| Title | Last Updated By | Updated | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| There are no pages at the moment. | ||||