You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 4
Next »
| Status | |
| Owner | Cindy He, Ayaka Ghoos, Michele Nicastri |
| Stakeholders | |
Issue
This KDD is to assess the best approach (pre-built apps vs. in-house development) for the mobility solution.
Background & Context
Project Background
Business Requirements
Options considered
Option A: Pre-built Solution with some Customized Developments
Solution Overview
Key Functionalities
Vendor/Partner Involvement
Option B: Full In-house Developments
Solution Overview
Key Functionalities
Implementation Team
Evaluation
| Option A Pre-built Solution with some Customized Developments | Option B Full In-house Developments |
|---|
Function Fit & Customization | Limited customization options, although many pre-built apps offer configuration settings.
| High degree of customization, as Syensqo can design the solution to fit your specific requirements.
|
Scalability | Generally scalable, as they are designed for a wide range of use cases, and may have limitations in extreme scaling scenarios.
| Scalability can be tailored to business needs
Requires careful design and ongoing monitoring.
|
User Experience (UX)
| Typically follow SAP Fiori UX design principles, which are user-friendly and familiar to users.
| Syensqo will have full control over the design and user experience.
To achieve a high-quality, intuitive UX may take more time and effort.
|
Integration with SAP S/4HANA | Out-of-the-box integration with SAP S/4HANA, leveraging standard APIs and predefined processes.
| Can be tailored for specific integration needs but may require more development effort and testing to ensure seamless integration with SAP S/4HANA.
|
| Time to Implement | If there are few customization requirements, in general, faster implementation and go-live, as they are ready-to-use with minimal configuration.
Product unique skills are required, so will be largely rely on the expertise and availabilities from vendor.
| Longer time frame required for design, development, testing, and deployment.
Expertise base is much wider and generic. Has less limitation and constraints on the required skills.
|
| Maintenance and Support | Regular updates from the vendor or SAP ensure the app stays up to date.
Vendor updates may not always align with your timeline.
| Syensqo will have full control over updates and maintenance but must allocate internal resources to manage it. |
| Innovation and Future-Proofing | Likely to be continuously updated by the vendor.
Vendor updates may not always align perfectly with your evolving needs.
| Flexibility to incorporate new features and innovative technologies.
Requires ongoing investment.
|
| Cost Considerations | Initial Investment Licensing and subscription costs. Lower initial cost.
On-going Costs Maintenance, updates, support costs. Ongoing fees.
| Initial Investment Development costs (including resources, training, infrastructure). Higher initial cost.
On-going Costs Maintenance, bug fixing, future upgrades, and resource requirements for ongoing support. Potentially lower long-term maintenance.
|
See also
No files shared here yet.
Workflow history
| Title |
Last Updated By |
Updated |
Status |
|
|
There are no pages at the moment.
|