High Level Project Architecture
Here is a the link of the data architecture schema.
Architecture - High Level Design (HLD)
Link.
Architecture - Low Level Design (LLD)
Link.
Architecture Data Flow
DataPrep Flow
Schema showing the different STEPS of the application flow - with the data involved at each step
Steps descriptions
Describe the data and process involved at each step
SAP PF1
Description
This project has the data from SAP on QM, material document and Vendor master data tables loading into Industrial data ocean for all data in PF1 basing on the create and modification date. Then, the view on top will filter only Soda Ash data.
Note: Soda ash data has only in PF1, therefore, this project will load only from PF1. (It is not include WP1)
Tools
Talend:
1. Loading
The data will keep in
Bucket = cs-ew1-prj-data-dm-industrial-[dev]-staging and it will keep in each folder for each table
GCP project =prj-data-dm-industrial-[env]
1.1 Incremental Load
The main job is F100_SPF_IND_QM_Main to run all the incremental load, which include the loading of table MCH1, MCHA, QALS, AFVC, QAMR, QAMV, QAVE, MSEG, PLPO in sequence in order to limit the number of background job in SAP.
Job STG ODS Comment F001_SPF_F001_I_H_AFVC_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_I_H_afvc
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_I_H_afvc F001_SPF_F001_I_H_MCH1_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_I_H_mch1
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_I_H_mch1 F001_SPF_F001_I_H_MCHA_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_I_H_mcha
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_I_H_mcha F001_SPF_F001_I_H_MSEG_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_I_H_mseg
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_I_H_mseg F001_SPF_F001_I_H_PLPO_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_I_H_plpo
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_I_H_plpo It may not need. F001_SPF_F001_I_H_QALS_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_I_H_qals
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_I_H_qals F001_SPF_F001_I_H_QAMR_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_I_H_qamr
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_I_H_qamr F001_SPF_F001_I_H_QAMV_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_I_H_qamv
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_I_H_qamv F001_SPF_F001_I_H_QAVE_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_I_H_qave
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_I_H_qave The job AFVC is required to run after QALS because the job will select the list of AUFPL (Routing number of operations in the order) from last load of QALS (max meta_business_date). In case of reload, it will rely on QALS table as well.
1.2 Full Load
Job F101_SPF_IND_QM_Main_Full will manage the full load job.
Job STG ODS Comment F001_SPF_F001_F_D_LFA1_TO_BQ STG_SPF_0000_0000_F001_F_H_lfa1
ODS_SPF_0000_F001_F_H_lfa1
2. Reloading data
All the job will have context parameter l_VAR_eBatch_PF1_[TableName]_additional_filter to change the selection when extract the SAP. For incremental load, this context MUST BE "incremental". If it is blank, it will get data from 2023.
The incremental load is based on the following field
Table
Name of Table
Incremental load by
MCH1
Batches (if Batch Management Cross-Plant)
ERSDA - Create date
LAEDA - Modify date
MCHA
Batches
ERSDA- Create date
LAEDA - Modify date
QALS
Inspection lot record (header)
ERSTELDAT- Create date
AENDERDAT - Modify date
QAMR
Characteristic results during inspection processing
ERSTELLDAT- Create date
AENDERDAT - Modify date
QAMV
Characteristic specifications for inspection processing
(Average / Summary result)
ERSTELLDAT- Create date
AENDERDAT - Modify date
QAVE
Inspection processing: Usage decision
VDATUM- Create date
VAEDATUM - Modify date
MSEG
Document Segment: Material
CPUDT_MKPF- Create date
/BEV2/ED_AEDAT - Modify date
PLPO
Task list - operation/activity
ANDAT - Create date
AEDAT - Modify date
AFVC
Operation within an order
Get list of AUFPL from last load of QALS
LFA1
Vendor Master (General Section)
FULL
Note: the incremental will check only date not the time.
Example of context reload
l_VAR_eBatch_PF1_AFVC_additional_filter = AUFPL >= '1007995974' and AUFPL <= '1009027526'
l_VAR_eBatch_PF1_MCH1_additional_filter = ERSDA > '20230101'
Access rights
To access to SAP, the Talend user RFC_TAL_PF1 is required
Source
Format
Destination
Location
DataOean GCP = prj-data-dm-industrial-dev
Product GCP = prj-data-sad-ebatch-ppd
To save the data into GCP Industrial Data Ocean, service account is required
Format
Same as the source
Sizing
Expected data volume for :
- full process on LFA1 table and the rest are incremental process
Assessment
How to validate that the generated output is valid: Compare with table in PF1
Scheduling
It is schedule by plan in TMC:
PL_INDUS_EBATCH_LOAD (incremental load) At the moment in dev, it is loading daily at 8:00 CET.
PL_INDUS_EBATCH_LOAD_FULL (full load, only LFA1 table) At the moment in dev, it is not scheduled
Timing
The average time expected for :
- full process - Depend
- incremental process : 5 - 10 min
Criticality
High / Medium / Low ??
Logging
1. Table log: This sql will get the status log that have job name from source system SPF (PF1)
select job.job_name, job.meta_start_date, logs.meta_run_id, logs.meta_source_system, logs.meta_step, logs.meta_status, logs.meta_num_lines, logs.meta_error_lines from STG.log_tables logs join STG.run_jobs job on logs.meta_run_id = job.meta_run_id
where logs.meta_run_id in (SELECT meta_run_id FROM STG.run_jobs order by meta_start_date desc limit 100)
and job_name like '%SPF%'
and meta_start_date > DATE_SUB(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(), INTERVAL 1 DAY)
order by job.meta_start_date desc2. Incremental table: Every time that the job loading complete, max time from staging table will update this table. Therefore, it is easier to know which table is not updated.
Table: STG.incremental_loading
PI Startrek
SAME QUESTIONS



