| Status | |
| Owner | Antonio Zappone |
| Stakeholders |
Issue
Recommendation
Background & Context
DD075 - Future system to support Treasury activities
CR0003 - Transition Treasury from Quantum to S/4HANA
The above KDD and Change Request were approved to bring Treasury activities into the scope of the SyWay project,
A decision in now required as to when the deploy the Treasury modules within the SyWay deployment Groups. There are currently two official deployment groups, Group 1 and Group 2.
Assumptions
Constraints
Impacts
KDD070 - Deployment Approach for In-House Bank (IHB)
Extract from KDD070
Option E: Defer the deployment of In-House Bank functionality for all GBUs and Entities until after the second group go-live.
This Conceptual Design recommendation will be re-assessed during Detailed Design when more information will be available to support a decision. Options B, C, and E will form part of the reassessment. Any long lasting impacts on S/4HANA from the legacy interim IHB requirements will also be considered at this time.
Treasury and In-House bank and heavily integrated, as such the deployment timing of the In-House Bank comes into consideration.
For the purpose of this KDD, IHB go-live will be referred to as Group 3. Note: there is no official Group 3
Entity 2002 Syensqo SA (ECC Company code 2002)
This entity resides in PF1, and hold the accounting for both Treasury and the In House Bank.
This entity is holds the accounting for the non Treasury activities, for example head office.
Accounting entries from the PI1 system are interfaced into 2002 in PF1 to produce statutory accounts, and also interfaced to BFC from PF1.
Entity 2002 Syensqo SA resides in PF1 and hence in schedule to go-live with Group 1.
Analysis conducted for this KDD highlights that it is easier (less interim interfaces) to deploy entity Sysensqo SA with the rest of Treasury and IHB
Business Rules
There are no relevant business rules at this point in time.
Options considered
Numerous options were assessed, due to the significant integration of Treasury, with;
1) IHB
2) The existing PI1 system
3) Accounting within the Sysensqo SA entity residing in PF1.
The recommnedation proposed is for the Syensqo SA entry to move in Group 2.
| Activity to Deploy | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | Option 4 | Option 5 | Option 6 | Option 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option A | Option B | Option C | Option D | ||||
| Treasury (TRM & CM) | Group 1 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 2 | Post Group 2 | Post Group 2 | Post Group 2 |
| Entity Syensqo SA (2002) | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 1 | Group 1 | Group 1 |
| IHB | Post Group 2 | Post Group 2 | Post Group 2 | Post Group 2 | Group 2 | Group 2 | Post Group 2 |
Option A: Deploy with Group 1
Option B: Deploy with Group 2
Option C: Deploy with IHB after Group 2
Option D: Deploy after Group 2 along with IHB.
Evaluation
| Criteria | Deploy | Option A | Option B | Option C | Option D | Option E | Option F | Option G | Option A | Option B | Option C | Option D | Option E | Option F | Option G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treasury | Group 1 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 2 | Group 2 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||||||||
Syensqo SA | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 1 | ||||||||
IHB | Group 3 | Group 3 | Group 3 | Group 3 | Group 2 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||||||||
| Cash Management (CM) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Low | Low | Med | Med | High | High | High | |
| Efficient Management of IHB Exposures |
|
|
|
In interim PI1 data would continue to go to Quantum. As-is to continue. |
|
| Low | Low | Low | Low | High | High | High | ||
| Efficient Management non-IHB Exposures |
New "interim" interface req'd to bring Group 2 entity exposure to S4 |
| |
| Med | Med | Med | Med | Med | Med | Low | ||||
| Ease of Accounting for Treasury Deals (from Header Entity) | |||||||||||||||
| Ease of Accounting for IHB entities (2232 & 4044). | |||||||||||||||
| Ability in implement and manage Intercompany Loans | |||||||||||||||
| Ability to perform Treasury transactions outside of central Treasury Entity | |||||||||||||||
| Ease of Cut-over at implementation | |||||||||||||||
| Indirect impact - Alignment with Consolidations Group Reporting | |||||||||||||||
| Indirect impact - Alignment with Intercompany Service Billing \ Recharges |