You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 19 Next »

Status

  Approved

Owner
Stakeholders

@Marie Flourie

Issue

Syensqo currently uses the following SAP functionalities in ECC to cover HSE requirements relating to Safety Datasheets, Labelling, Dangerous Goods 

Management, Substance Volume Tracking and Compositions.

  • Composition
  • Company Substance Management
  • Raw Materials
  • SDS Template and Generation
  • Other Documents
  • SDS Authoring Automation Algorithm (“Expert Rules”)
  • Mass Upload / Modification (User Accessible)
  • SVT(Substance Volume Tracking
  • SVHC(Substance of Very High Concern)

These SAP functionalities are covered by SAP Product Compliance with S/4 HANA.
S/4HANA offers the option to implement a 'Classic Version' or a 'New Version' for SAP Product Compliance. A decision is required, which version of

S/4HANA Product Compliance (NEW or CLASSIC) should be implemented considering scope of the each items and timelines.


Recommendation

Recommendation: To Adapt Option D


The recommendation is to implement the S/4HANA for Product Compliance 'Hybrid Version' (Option D (Classic + New)).

This is driven by the following key points:

  • The S/4HANA Product Compliance New Version (Option A) is available for implementation starting with S/4HANA 2023, but it is expected to reach its full functional scope only by 2027. Until then, it will have notable functionality gaps compared to the Classic version.
  • Implementing the S/4HANA Product Compliance Classic Version (Option B) will require a new re-implementation project (big bang approach) to be completed before support for the Classic version ends in 2036. This would essentially involve a greenfield implementation of Product Compliance, as the data models between the Classic and New versions are not compatible.
  • Continuing with ECC On-Premise would result in limited long-term viability and present significant challenges in terms of integration with key functional areas such as Logistics, Transportation Management, and Product Master. Given that S/4HANA adoption is central to the ERP Rebuild strategy, this option should be excluded. Additionally, the practicality of maintaining an ECC6 system landscape for this purpose is questionable. Therefore, Option C—continuation with ECC6—is not considered a viable path forward.


  • The S/4HANA Product Compliance Hybrid Version (Option D: Classic + New) allows for a phased adoption of the New Version functionality as it becomes available. This approach decouples SAP’s release timeline from the SyWay project schedule, providing flexibility to adopt new capabilities based on business readiness.

    By enabling a gradual rollout, implementation efforts are expected to be smaller in scale and more manageable. The hybrid model also allows Syensqo to leverage new features to meet future business requirements without needing additional custom enhancements to address existing scope gaps.

          Accordingly, based on the current feature set, the following processes are categorized under the appropriate versions of Product Compliance.

Process CategoryProposal
CompositionClassic (Replicate custom development)
Raw Materials ManagementClassic (Partially replicate the solution in S/4HANA Classic by managing raw materials data based on supplier SDSs, while partially leveraging S/4HANA New capabilities for managing raw materials data objects driven by logistics events)
SDS Template and GenerationClassic (Migrate the WWI templates along with the associated specific characteristics (and certain function modules) as-is, except for the CH1 address, logo, and emergency telephone numbers, which will revert to the standard configuration)
Other DocumentsClassic (Replicate RDS (Regulatory Data Summaries) authoring in S/4HANA Classic, excluding Certificates. Explore alternative methods for document authoring— either using the new technology (Adobe Forms) available in S/4HANA New, or leveraging Datasphere to address ad hoc requirements.)
SDS Authoring Automation Algorithm (“Expert Rules”)Classic (As Authoring is not available in S4 NEW) 
Mass Upload / Modification (User Accessible)Classic (Replicate the solution in S/4HANA Classic and explore how it can be replaced with standard functionality in S/4HANA New after the transition to SDS Authoring.) 
SVT(Substance Volume Tracking)Classic (Revert to standard functionality in S/4HANA) 
Company Substance ManagementNew (Develop in S4 New (if not feasible using standard functionality))
SVHC(Substance of Very High Concern)New (Implement in S/4HANA New with limited custom development)


Background & Context

The strategy is to utilize S/4HANA Product Compliance New functionality as extensively as possible. However, since the full scope is not yet available in the New version, a Hybrid Approach (New + Classic) has been adopted. The processes have been categorized below based on the corresponding versions of Product Compliance.


Process CategoryProduct Compliance Version in S4 HANA
CompositionClassic 
Raw Materials ManagementClassic 
SDS Template and GenerationClassic 
Other DocumentsClassic 
SDS Authoring Automation Algorithm (“Expert Rules”)Classic 
Mass Upload / Modification (User Accessible)Classic 
SVT(Substance Volume Tracking)Classic
Company Substance ManagementNew 
SVHC(Substance of Very High Concern)New 


Assumptions

  • Customer is migrating to or already using S/4HANA Product Compliance (New).

It is assumed that:

  • The S/4HANA Product Compliance Classic version includes all functionalities required by Syensqo. SAP currently indicates that nearly all features from SAP Product Safety and SAP Product and REACH Compliance are available in this version.
  • The MSDS Maker functionality is not included in the Classic version and has been replaced by CosSta (Conditions for Safety Statements), which is part of the SAP EHS Rule Editor.
  • Any impacts arising from this KDD on other ERP Rebuild EHS KDDs will be addressed through subsequent KDDs related to the respective ERP Rebuild EHS components.
  • The ERP Rebuild will not result in an unsupported platform, following platform license negotiations, and a supported S/4HANA version will serve as the core platform (see related KDDs listed under 'References').
  • The current 3E ERC Suite (Enterprise Regulatory Content) license in use by Syensqo may need to be upgraded to include the 3E ERC+ Suite.


Constraints

  • Functional Gaps and Feature Limitations

  • Migration Complexity and Data Consistency

  • Custom logic via BAdIs might increase implementation effort and complexity.

  • There’s no UI-based Rule Editor as intuitive as the CG02 Expert Rule Editor.

  • A decision for 'Classic Version' would need to consider that a reimplementation of Product Compliance will be required before 2036 for a 
    greenfield implementation of 'New Version' for S/4 HANA Product Compliance.
  • SAP have not been able to provide clear guidance on the roadmap and alignment beyond 2025 of S/4HANA features at the time of writing.


Impacts

AreaImpact
AutomationNeed to rebuild logic 
Migration EffortHigh based on the Volume of Data
User TrainingNew interfaces and logic mechanisms
PerformanceMay improve 
Future-readinessAligns with SAP’s roadmap and innovations
  • All capabilities within the Product Compliance business area are available in SAP S/4HANA, although the specific scope may differ from the functionality offered in the ECC-based products. The available options are as follows:
  1. For customers licensed with SAP S/4HANA and SAP S/4HANA for Product Compliance, there is flexibility to use either the Classic functionality or the New functionality.
  2. For customers subscribed to SAP S/4HANA Cloud, private edition and SAP S/4HANA Cloud for Product Compliance, private edition, both the Classic and New functionalities are available and can be selected as needed.
  3. For customers subscribed to SAP S/4HANA Cloud, public edition and SAP S/4HANA Cloud for Product Compliance, public edition, only the New functionality of Product Compliance is available.
  • Additionally, the current 3E ERC Suite (Enterprise Regulatory Content) license used by Syensqo may require an upgrade to include the 3E ERC+ Suite to support extended regulatory content needs.

Business Rules

Business rules may be required to ensure alignment between the New and Classic versions of Product Compliance—for example, in areas such as SDS version management.


Options considered

Option A: S4 Classic

The SAP ERP-based Product Safety and Product Compliance (Classic) solutions offer:

  • A complete feature set

  • Interfaces via SAP GUI and Web Dynpro transactions

  • A specification database with a workbench-based approach

  • Full functional scope with no further enhancements planned

  • Immediate availability

  • SAP standard maintenance support from 2029 until 2036

To continue using this version, a new greenfield implementation project will be required between 2027 and 2036. Furthermore, transitioning to the New Version of Product Compliance—once it reaches feature parity (currently targeted for 2027)—will necessitate a separate migration or re-implementation project. Given the significant differences in data models, this transition will be complex and not a simple technical upgrade.

Option B: S4 New

The New Version of Product Compliance features:

  • A modern process model supported by SAP Fiori apps

  • A new CDS-based data model

  • Enhanced integration with Product Master, Sales, Delivery, Procurement, and Transportation

  • Improved alignment with logistics processes

Currently, it offers a limited functional scope, with ongoing developments outlined in the innovation roadmap. The available capabilities include:

  • Product Marketability(Note: Full functionality of SVT not yet available)

  • Dangerous Goods Management

  • SDS Management (Note: Full SDS authoring, BOMBOS transfer functionalities are not yet available)

This version is available starting with S/4HANA 2023, but only with limited functionality. The full scope is expected to be delivered with S/4HANA 2027.

Option C: Continue with ECC 6.0

There is an option to continue using SAP ECC 6.0 On-Premise, which is supported by SAP until the end of 2027.

After 2027, extended support is available from SAP on a paid basis.

This approach assumes the continuation of the current “As-Is” setup on ECC 6.0 On-Premise systems.

However, between 2027 and 2030, a greenfield implementation project will be required to transition to Product Compliance on S/4HANA.

Option D: Hybrid (Classic + New)




Evaluation



Option A: Continue AS-IS

Option B:
Compliance Requirement
System Integration

(minus)Con: Complex Customization and Maintenance:-Even minor changes may require deep understanding of EHS data structures, rule sequences, and integration dependencies.

(minus)Con: Limited Reusability:- Expert Rules are tightly coupled to specific EHS data models and not reusable across modules like Product Compliance, Dangerous Goods, or SVT without significant rework.

(plus)Pro: Instead of using separate tool like EHS Expert, everything is now integrated, smarter, and more flexible, right inside S4 HANA - or through connected services when needed.


Compliance Management

(minus)Con: Compliance Management:- Hard to adapt to complex or dynamic regulations

(plus)Pro: Centralized, scalable, Flexible

            

Maintenance

(minus)Con: Requires technical effort for every update

(plus)Pro: Centralized Management: Compliance Requirements are managed in one place and can be applied across products and regions, reducing redundancy.

(plus)Pro: Impact Analysis: Any changes in a requirement can automatically trigger re-assessments, helping ensure ongoing compliance without having to manually track updates.

Scalability

(minus)Con: Performance issues in large datasets

(plus)Pro: Modular Structure: Each requirement can be scoped to a region, regulation, or compliance purpose, allowing companies to scale by simply adding new requirements (e.g., for new countries or products).

(plus)Pro: Integration with Product Master Data: Seamlessly integrates with material/product data and processes (e.g., sales, purchase), allowing the compliance framework to grow with the business.

Reusability

(minus)Con: Rules are tightly scoped and hard to generalize across processes

(plus)Pro: Reusable Assessment Logic: Once created, Compliance Requirements can be reused across multiple products, plants, or business units.

(plus)Pro: Rule Reuse Across Products: Rules and checks defined within a requirement automatically apply to any product linked to that requirement — no need to recreate logic.




See also


No files shared here yet.

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 19) Sept 10, 2025 12:51 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 42 Aug 20, 2025 16:00 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 41 Aug 20, 2025 10:49 ROUT-ext, Praksh
v. 40 Aug 20, 2025 10:45 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 39 Aug 14, 2025 16:59 CHOUDHARY-ext, Tanvi
v. 38 Aug 08, 2025 12:57 ROUT-ext, Praksh
v. 37 Aug 08, 2025 12:56 ROUT-ext, Praksh
v. 36 Aug 08, 2025 11:01 ROUT-ext, Praksh
v. 35 Aug 08, 2025 10:53 CHOUDHARY-ext, Tanvi
v. 34 Aug 08, 2025 10:48 CHOUDHARY-ext, Tanvi

Go to Page History

  • No labels