| Status | Approved |
|---|---|
| Owner | BECHTER-ext, Alex |
| Stakeholders | ANGGREANI-ext, Lisa |
| Jira Request ID | ERP-114 - Getting issue details... STATUS |
| Jira Development ID | ERP-557 - Getting issue details... STATUS |
High- Level Specification
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Application System | S/4 HANA (all instances) |
| Business Process Reference | 09.05.04.01. Process General Journal Entries |
Functional Overview
This enhancement is to ensure that manual journals posted in the system have adequate supporting documents attached before they get routed for review and approval.
The primary purpose is to increase the degree of SOX compliance and to further tighten internal controls around manual journal entries and to drive up efficiency in the journal review process in the new S/4 HANA systems.
Internal controls exist at Syensqo around the existence of supporting documents for manually posted journals in the system. This is currently monitored via detective mechanisms at period-end that requires manual With the proposed enhancement it is safeguarded that
1.) the internal control is adhered to in all cases in a preventive manner rather than via detective monitoring activities at period-end
2.) Approvers/Reviewers don’t need to spend time rejecting journals that lack supporting documents which should lead to efficiency gains compared to the current state.
Scope and Objectives
This enhancement shall be applicable to manual journals posted via the below two Fiori applications and its respective successor apps in future S/4 HANA releases:
- F4670A - Verify Currency Adjustment- New Version
- F2457A - Verify General Journal Entries - New Version
Please note that Fiori app 'F4670A - Verify Currency Adjustment-New Version' also allows for bulk upload processing via Excel upload functionality. As part of this process, another enhancement (ERP-558) automatically attaches the Excel upload template as supporting document to all journals submitted for review in the respective upload batch. As such, the existence of a supporting document is system-assured if journal entries are entered via this mode of entry and therefore doesn't require further validation via this enhancement. Journals uploaded via Excel upload functionality shall be exempted from the validations proposed in this enhancement.
SAP standard does not provide similar validation features in its current S/4 HANA releases and also doesn't intend to implement any in the foreseeable future. An incident with SAP was logged to query about possible inclusions in the future roadmap designs for journal entries. While the request was acknowledged and generally understood as a legit requirement, SAP also pointed out that there is no roadmap item planned out currently to embed this feature into the standard product offerings in the foreseeable future. Please refer to OSS incident 858195/2025 for further reference.
Step | Description | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | User launching Fiori app F4670A or F2457A | |
| 2 | Foreground entry mode selected by end-user | |
| 3 | User populates journal entry details and attempts to submit journal entry for review. | |
| 4 | Enhancement kicks in to validate if attachment has been provided. | Trigger for enhancement to get prompted is |
| 5 | Error message gets issued if attachment is missing and submission of journal for review shall be blocked. | |
| 6 | User attaches supporting document to the journal entry. Then re-submits the journal for review. | |
| 7 | Enhancement gets prompted again. The check is successful hence the journal shall be passed on to the subsequent applications for further processing. |
Assumptions
The following assumptions are taken for this custom development:
- Fiori applications evolve over time as SAP is constantly improving its current product offerings. At the time of writing, the enhancement is applicable to journal entries posted via Fiori apps F4670A and F2457A which are the latest journal entry apps available in S/4 private cloud environments. If new apps are released by SAP in future releases that offer significantly better useability for journal entry processing, Syensqo may adopt these applications as new default entry methods for journal entries. The enhancement may need to be extended to those successor applications as well in future releases.
- The enhancement shall be withdrawn once SAP adds the built feature into its scope of standard functionalities for journal entry processing.
- The enhancement shall remain in place even if Syensqo decides to move away from a mandatory review process for high-value G/L journals to ensure compliance with internal controls and best practices for journal entry processing. Journals posted without adequate levels of support invite audit queries that may be difficult to resolve without proper justifications.
Dependencies
Security, Integrity and Controls
Configuration Requirements
Language Requirements
Special Requirements
Design Rationale
Functional Requirements
Proposed Technology to Use
Data Source Considerations
| Table | Field Name | Comments/Calculation/Field Manipulation |
|---|---|---|
Data Validation Considerations
| Table | Field Name | Comments/Calculation/Field Manipulation |
|---|---|---|
Custom Tables
Master Data
| Field | Description | Data Type/Length | Validation rule/ Value Help |
|---|---|---|---|
Configuration Table
| Field | Description | Data Type/Length | Validation rule/ Value Help |
|---|---|---|---|
Selection Screen Enhancement
| Field Name | Description | Select: | Data Type/Length | Default Value/ Validation rule/ Value Help | Selection Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Processing Logic
Volumetrics
Performance Considerations
Error Handling
Testing
How to Test
Test Conditions and Expected Results
| ID | Condition | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
Test Considerations/Dependencies
Other Information
Development Details
Package
| Package Name | Parent Package |
|---|---|
Enhancement Implementation
| Enhancement Type | Standard Definition Name | Custom Implementation Name | Design Rationale Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
Other Development Objects
| Object Type | Object Name | Purpose/High Level Logic | Design Rationale Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
Appendix
Custom Authorization Group Naming Convention
This table is based on the Syensqo development standards document. It provides the naming conventions for authorization groups to associated with custom reports and tables to comply with security requirements.
ABAP | ZFI | ZMM | ZPS | ZCO | ZSD | ZBC | ZFI | ZCA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TABLES | ZFIT | ZMMT | ZPST | ZCOT | ZSDT | ZBCT | ZFIT | ZCAT |