| Status | Pending Stakeholder Review |
| Owner | Gautier Todoschini |
| Stakeholders | James Kyndt, John Donovan, Frank Bolata, Boris Foiselle |
Issue
Today, external users are provided with a Syensqo account and subsequent Google Workspace license. Microsoft has “External ID” capabilities that would avoid consuming a license for externals using M365, but require operating model changes on which there is currently no consensus.
Recommendation
Background & Context
Microsoft Entra (formerly Azure Active Directory) offers robust Business-to-Business (B2B) collaboration features, enabling organizations to securely work with external partners, suppliers, vendors, and customers. Here’s what it provides:
1. Secure External Collaboration
- Invite External Users: Organizations can invite users from any domain (e.g., partners, suppliers) to access specific resources, apps, or services.
- Flexible Identity Options: External users can sign in with their own credentials (Microsoft, Google, or other email accounts), reducing friction and improving user experience.
2. Granular Access Management
- Conditional Access Policies: Apply security policies (like MFA, location-based access, or device compliance) to external users, just as you would for internal users.
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Assign precise permissions to external users, ensuring they only access what’s necessary.
3. Seamless Integration
- Single Sign-On (SSO): External users can access shared apps and resources without needing to remember new passwords.
- Collaboration Across Tenants: Enables cross-organization collaboration in Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, and other Microsoft 365 services.
4. Lifecycle Management
- Automated User Provisioning/Deprovisioning: Easily add or remove external users as business relationships change.
- Self-Service Capabilities: External users can manage their own profiles and reset passwords if needed.
5. Compliance and Security
- Audit Logs and Monitoring: Track external user activities for compliance and security purposes.
- Privacy Controls: Organizations retain control over their data and can enforce privacy requirements.
6. Feature Pricing
| FEATURE | PRICING |
|---|---|
MAUs below 50,000 | Free, with core identity and access management features |
MAUs beyond 50,000 | Pay-as-you-go pricing (e.g., ~$0.00325 per MAU depending on features used) |
SMS Phone Authentication | Billed per transaction (varies by country) |
Microsoft Entra ID Governance Add-on | Available only for business guest scenarios; pricing varies |
Assumptions
Constraints
Impacts
Options considered
Option 1: B2B + DLP Integration via LEAP Project
Approach:
Deploy Microsoft Entra B2B with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) as a dedicated stream.
Governance:
Close collaboration with SYWAY program for streamlined onboarding/offboarding.
Benefits:
- Suppliers use their own identities and licenses.
- Reduces internal M365 license consumption.
- Minimizes process overhead.
- Aligns with conservative security and compliance posture.
Considerations:
- Requires redesign of complex processes and use cases.
- May involve a few additional licenses (e.g., for DLP or admin roles).
- Using Microsoft Entra B2B for identity federation.
- Applying DLP policies to protect sensitive data.
- MFA and Conditional Access: for securing guest access.
- Enabling auditing and monitoring for external access
- External collaboration settings: To manage who can invite guests and which domains are allowed.
- Cross-tenant access settings: To control access at the user, group, or app level.
Option 2: Status Quo - Internal Identity Creation
Approach:
Continue creating identities (SuccessFactor) internal accounts for all external users. (Entra / AD)
Governance:
Close collaboration with SYWAY program for streamlined onboarding/offboarding.
Implications:
- M365 license required per user (P2, F3, E3, E5) with long-term commitment (5 years).
- Higher operational overhead.
- Future B2B adoption would require a separate transformation project.
Evaluation
Option 1 B2B + DLP Integration via LEAP Project | Option 2 Status Quo - Internal Identity Creation | |
| Technical Feasibility |
| |
| User Impact |
|
|
| Support Impact |
|
|
| Operational Complexity | ||
| Cost |

