You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 28 Next »

Status


MTR   Approved

Owner
Stakeholders
Jira Request ID

ERP-327 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Jira Development ID

ERP-862 - Getting issue details... STATUS

High- Level Specification

ParameterValue
Application SystemS/4Hana ROW, S/4Hana China, S/4Hana CUI
Business Process Reference06.11.02.01. Manage Outbound Material Flow w/wo Discrepancies for EWM

Functional Overview

The functional design of the enhancements describes the scenario(s) where enhancements to existing SAP programs are required.

Integration Topic #287

Topic:

Prevent Ready for Shipping Status when batch or stock is restricted.

Description:

During the warehouse execution process after picking and packing is completed, it is possible that the batches or Stock are moved to Restricted status by QM. In this case the system should stop allowing the Ready for Shipment status in EWM to be sent to TM, so that the packing information of restricted batches is prevented from getting updated in TM. In addition the Business requires to have automatic check and prevent start loading of already picked Goods, this can be done with reverse of the status to Not-Ready for Shipping. 



Requirement details:

Batch job will run to select deliveries relevant to set up Ready for Shipping status with check if all Batches and Stock are Unrestricted, and with additional check of the Stock and Batches for deliveries with already set Ready for Shipping status but not Goods Issue. Deliveries with already set status Ready for Shipping and any of the Batches and Stock not Unrestricted, need to be reversed to Not-Ready for Shipping status.

The following scenarious need to be covered.

Scenario 1) Block Ready for Shipping if any Batch or Stock are Restricted.

Scenario 2) Set Ready for Shipping status only if Batches and Stock are Unrestricted.

Scenario 3) If Ready for Shipping status already set for deliveries but not yet posted Goods Issue - Reverse to Not-Ready for Shipping status if any Batch or Stock is Restricted.


Scope and Objectives


Scope:

The standard program cannot be executed automatically because the action needs to be repeated in respective time frames, and the Business Process requires to be scheduled to run as a Background Job. 

The program needs to be created with a special variant for Batch Job execution for every EWM Warehouse, where this process is applicable.


Objectives:

As part of the SyWay EWM Outbound execution process, there is a requirement to set Ready for Shipping status Automatically when Picking is finished in EWM.

The Ready for Shipping status must be set only if all Batches and Stock is Unrestricted. The Ready for Shipping status sends the Picking/Packing details to TM and update the respective FU/FO.

As the Ready for Shipping status is a prerequisite for Loading in TM, we need to prevent the Loading execution if any of the Batches or respective Stock is other than Unrestricted.

In such way there is a need to automatically reverse back the status to Not-Ready for Shipping for deliveries with not yet posted Goods Issue, if any of the Batches or Stock was moved to other than Unrestricted status.


Process Flow Diagram


Step

Description

Comment

1.List Deliveries relevant for the changing the status to Ready For Shipping, with EWM ODO Picking status Completed.This step will be done by the standard program /SCWM/R_SET_DSH_STAT_AUTOMATIC.
2.Loop through the list of selected EWM Outbound Delivery Orders.
2.1.Check if all of the Batches, picked for EWM ODO are Unrestricted.table 
2.2.Check if all of the Stock, picked for EWM ODO is Unrestricted.table /SCDL/DB_PROCI_O
2.3.Set the status Ready for Shipping for respective EWM ODO only if both previous checks are passed and Stock and Batches are Unrestricted. 
2.4.Confirm if the status Ready for Shipping is set or check the error messages. 
3.Output the messages. 
4.List Deliveries with status Ready For Shipping with not posted Goods Issue. 
5.Loop through the list of selected EWM Outbound Delivery Orders. 
5.1.Check if any of the Batches, picked for EWM ODO is not Unrestricted. 
5.2.Check if any of the Stock, picked for EWM ODO is not Unrestricted. 
5.3. Reverse the status Ready for Shipping to Not-Ready for Shipping, for respective EWM ODO, if any of the both previous checks are passed and any of the Stock or Batches are not Unrestricted. 
5.4.Confirm if the change of the status to Not-Ready for Shipping is set or check the error messages. 
6.Output the messages. 


Assumptions

We can use the standard configuration option to change the status Ready for Shipping and enhance,emt is required to prevent change of the status if any of the Batches are Restricted or any of the Stock is not Unrestricted.

We plan to create a Batch Job for Automatic change of the status of respective deliveries to Ready for Shipping and in case of already set status revert it to Not-Ready for Shipping in case of any Batch or Stock not Unrestricted for deliveries not Goods Issue posted.

Dependencies


Security, Integrity and Controls

Authorization check to be done via Authorization Group for Foreground process execution.


Configuration Requirements

Standard configuration for triggering the change of the status for respective delivery, after picking is completed.


Language Requirements

EN, FR, CN, IT

Special Requirements




Design Rationale

Functional Requirements

The Business team requires EWM Warehouse status change to Ready for Picking to be done automatically only if all assigned Batches and Stock are Unrestricted. Also revert  the status Not-Ready for Shipping for deliveries not yet Goods Issue posted if any of the assigned Batches or Stock are not Unrestricted.

Change of the status automatically to Ready for Shipping is standard process in EWM, the Job can be set directly using the standard program /SCWM/R_SET_DSH_STAT_AUTOMATIC, for deliveries with Picking completed.


The logic of the check of the Batch and Stock status will be added to the standard program, as it is not there as a standard steps.

Proposed Technology to Use


Batch Job

Data Source Considerations

TableField NameComments/Calculation/Field Manipulation











Data Validation Considerations

TableField NameComments/Calculation/Field Manipulation













Custom Tables

Master Data

FieldDescriptionData Type/LengthValidation rule/ Value Help









Configuration Table

FieldDescriptionData Type/LengthValidation rule/ Value Help








Selection Screen Enhancement

Field NameDescription

Select:

Data Type/LengthDefault Value/ Validation rule/ Value HelpSelection Logic













Processing Logic



Volumetrics


Performance Considerations



Error Handling


Testing

How to Test

Test Conditions and Expected Results

IDConditionExpected Result










Test Considerations/Dependencies


Other Information


Development Details

Package

Package NameParent Package




Enhancement Implementation

Enhancement TypeStandard Definition NameCustom Implementation NameDesign Rationale Reference









Other Development Objects

Object TypeObject NamePurpose/High Level LogicDesign Rationale Reference








Appendix

Custom Authorization Group Naming Convention

This table is based on the Syensqo development standards document. It provides the naming conventions for authorization groups to associated with custom reports and tables to comply with security requirements.

ABAP

ZFIZMMZPSZCOZSDZBCZFIZCA
TABLESZFITZMMTZPSTZCOTZSDTZBCTZFITZCAT

See also


No files shared here yet.

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 28) Dec 15, 2025 12:02 TORRES-ext, Benedict
v. 92 Dec 15, 2025 01:42 AGUADO-ext, Alvaro
v. 91 Dec 15, 2025 01:41 AGUADO-ext, Alvaro
v. 90 Dec 11, 2025 10:55 TURAN-ext, Mert
v. 89 Dec 08, 2025 14:16 TURAN-ext, Mert batch job to application job
v. 88 Dec 01, 2025 12:00 AGUADO-ext, Alvaro
v. 87 Dec 01, 2025 11:58 AGUADO-ext, Alvaro
v. 86 Dec 01, 2025 11:07 AGUADO-ext, Alvaro
v. 85 Dec 01, 2025 10:30 AGUADO-ext, Alvaro
v. 84 Dec 01, 2025 07:55 AGUADO-ext, Alvaro

Go to Page History

  • No labels