You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 25 Next »

Purpose

The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create Inspection Methods in S/4HANA.

Inspection Methods are master data objects in SAP Quality Management (QM) that describe how inspections are to be carried out. They specify the procedure, tools, or references to be used for measuring or evaluating inspection characteristics, and can include documents such as test instructions, work instructions, or external references. This feature ensures standardized execution of quality inspections across plants, materials, and processes.

In SAP S/4HANA, the structure and usage of inspection methods remain consistent with SAP ECC. Inspection methods are typically created at the plant level and assigned to master inspection characteristics (MICs) or directly to inspection plan characteristics. Methods may also include language-dependent descriptions, versioning, validity dates, and document references.

In SAP ECC, aside from the standard structure of inspection method master data (method number, version, plant, and description), additional combinations may exist, such as methods assigned to specific catalogs, methods linked to custom documentation, or methods maintained with plant-independent validity. Some legacy ECC systems may also contain methods with non-standard extensions or inactive versions that need to be reviewed and cleansed (pending MDS).

This conversion aims to migrate active and relevant inspection method records from existing ECC systems into S/4HANA by applying the required transformation logic using Syniti as the data migration and transformation platform. The converted records will be loaded into the target S/4HANA system using standard SAP mechanisms such as BAPIs (e.g., BAPI_INSPECTIONMETHOD_CREATE), IDOCs, or direct table loads where applicable, ensuring consistency, compliance, and reusability in quality processes.

This Conversion Specification does not include the WPX system (CUI Objects).



Conversion Scope

The scope of this document covers the approach for converting active 1043 Inspection Methods from Legacy Source Systems into S/4HANA following the Inspection Method Master Data Design Standard.

The data from legacy system includes:

  1. Active Inspection Methods used within the last four (4) years in inspection plans or master inspection characteristics or Master recipe.

  2. Inspection Methods without deletion flag.

  3. Consider inspection methods only with being created & released status for migration(LOEKZ = 1, 2)
  4. Plant-specific and global Inspection Methods that will be migrated to the To-Be Plant Mapping (taking into consideration the To-Be definition of Plants).

  5. Inspection Methods referenced in active MICs or inspection plans.

The data from legacy system excludes:

  1. Inactive Inspection Methods not used in more than four (4) years.

  2. Inspection Methods marked for deletion.

  3. Inspection methods other than released , being created status.
  4. Inspection Methods belonging to deleted plants (per To-Be Plant mapping).

  5. Obsolete or duplicate Inspection Methods that are no longer relevant


Relevancy rule

  1. Active Inspection Methods used within the last four (4) years in inspection plans or master inspection characteristics or Master recipe. 

Derive the last 4 years of Inspection plans or MICs from rules provided in respective CS, after that follow the below logics to get the list of Inspection methods.

(PLMK-QMTB_WERKS = QMTB-WERKS AND PLMK-PMETHOD = QMTB-PMTNR AND PLMK-PLNTY IN ('Q', '2')  )

OR 
(QPMZ-WERKPM = QMTB-WERKS AND QMPZ-PMETHOD = QMTB-PMTNR)

      2. Inspection Methods without deletion flag. QMTB-LOEKZ <> '4'(Deletion flag)

      3. Consider inspection methods only with released or being created status for migration. QMTB-LOEKZ = '2'(Released) or QMTB-LOEKZ '1'(Being created)


List of source systems and approximate number of records
SourceScope

Source Approx No. of Records

Target SystemTarget Approx

No. of Records

PF2/WP2

Inspection Methods will be extracted from PF2 and WP2

PF2 = 153

WP2 = 479

S/4 HANA

632 records

Additional Information

Multi-language Requirement

Inspection Method description will be maintained in English by default.

Since multi-language support is available for Inspection Method, users logging in with a different language will see the description displayed in their logon language, provided that the corresponding language key has been maintained in the on Inspection Method.

Document Management

Migration required if documents are identified. The conversion scope is limited to the migration of Inspection Method object. No images, or supporting files are included.

Legal Requirement

Not applicable

Special Requirements

Not applicable


Target Design

Inspection Method strictly adheres to the Master Data Standard. The complete information of the tables and key fields that hold the Inspection Method information follows the Master Data Standard document.

The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.

TableFieldData ElementField DescriptionData TypeLengthRequirement
QMTBWERKSQ_METH_PLANTFor inspection methods this plant is the planning plant, in which the inspection method was created in QM.CHAR4R
QMTBPMTNRQPMETHODEName that uniquely identifies an inspection method within a plant.
An inspection method describes how to inspect an inspection characteristic. We can assign an inspection method to a master inspection characteristic or directly to an inspection characteristic in an inspection plan.
CHAR8R
QMTBVERSIONQVERSNRPMVersion Number for inspection MethodCHAR6S
QMTBGUELTIGAB
DATUV
Specifies the start date for the validity period of the Inspection MethodDATS8R
QMTBLOEKZQLOESCHKZIndicates the processing status of the master record; for example, created, released, blocked, marked for deletion.CHAR1C
QMTBSORTFELDQSORTFELDThis field uses the search help to make it easier to find master data records.CHAR40C
DRADDOKARDOKARPart of the document key, which categorizes documents according to their distinguishing features and the organizational procedures which result from them.CHAR3C
DRADDOKTLDOKTLSection of a document which is maintained as an independent document.
Design departments, for example, can use document parts to divide up large documents such as design drawings into pages.
CHAR3C
DRADDOKVRDOKVRNumber which identifies the version of a document.CHAR2C
DRADDOKNRDOKNRDocument NumberCHAR25C
QMTBDUMMY10
This field is used to store information only. The system does not use the contents of this field. Its only purpose is to provide a place to store information that is relevant to an object, such as an inspection method or a master inspection characteristic.CHAR10C
QMTBDUMMY20
This field is used to store information only. The system does not use the contents of this field. Its only purpose is to provide a place to store information that is relevant to an object, such as an inspection method or a master inspection characteristic.CHAR20C
QMTBDUMMY40
This field is used to store information only. The system does not use the contents of this field. Its only purpose is to provide a place to store information that is relevant to an object, such as an inspection method or a master inspection characteristic.CHAR40C
QMTTWERKSQ_METH_PLANTFor inspection methods this plant is the planning plant, in which the inspection method was created in QM.CHAR4R
QMTTPMTNRQPMETHODEName that uniquely identifies an inspection method within a plant.
An inspection method describes how to inspect an inspection characteristic. We can assign an inspection method to a master inspection characteristic or directly to an inspection characteristic in an inspection plan.
CHAR8R
QMTTVERSIONQVERSNRPM_TXTVersion Number for inspection MethodCHAR6S
QMTTSPRACHE
SPRAS
The language key for the inspection method text.CHAR1R
QMTTKURZTEXT

QKURZTEXT

Text up to 40 characters in length that describes the Inspection MethodCHAR40C


Data Cleansing

IDCriticalityError Message/Report DescriptionRuleOutputSource System
1043_001C1Method not released or obsoleteMethod record is flagged for deletion (QMTB-LOEKZ) or has status that is not active. Only active methods should be migrated.Inspection MethodPF2/WP2
1043_002C1Invalid Validity DateValid-from date (QMTB-GUELTIGAB) is in the future.Validity DatesPF2/WP2
1043_003C1Missing Short TextMethod description (QMTT-KURZTEXT) is missing Method TextPF2/WP2
1043_004C1Orphaned Method ReferenceInspection plan characteristic (PLMK) references an inspection method (QMTB) that does not exist or is inactive.Inspection Plan LinkPF2/WP2
1043_005C2Duplicate MethodsMultiple active inspection methods exist with the same Plant + Method ID + Version combination.Inspection MethodPF2/WP2
1043_006C2Missing Long TextsMethod flagged for long text (QMTT-LTEXTKZ) but no lont is text maintained.Long TextPF2/WP2
1043_007C2Invalid Inspector QualificationMethod requires inspector qualification (QMTB-PRFQL) not available in customizing (TQ11).QualificationPF2/WP2



Conversion Process

The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:

The ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) process is a structured approach to data migration and management, ensuring high-quality data is seamlessly transferred across systems. Here’s a breakdown of its key components:

1. Extraction
The process begins with extracting metadata and raw data from source systems, such as Syensqo ECC system (i.e. WP2/PF2) periodically. The extracted data is then staged for transformation.


2. Transformation
Once extracted, the data undergoes cleansing, consolidation, and governance. This step ensures data integrity, consistency, and compliance with business rules. The transformation process includes:
- Data validation to remove inconsistencies.
- Standardization to align formats across datasets.
- Business rule application to refine data for operational use.


3. Loading
The transformed data is then loaded into the target S/4HANA system. 

Data Privacy and Sensitivity

Not applicable


Extraction

Extract data from a source into . There are 2 possibilities:

  1. The data exists. connects to the source and loads the data into . There are 3 methods:
    1. Perform full data extraction from relevant tables in the source system(s).
    2. Perform extraction through the application layer.
    3. Only if ; cannot connect to the source, data is loaded to the repository from the provided source system extract/report.
  2. The data does not exist (or cannot be converted from its current state). The data is manually collected by the business directly in . This is to be conducted using DCT (Data Collection Template) in

The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads

Extraction Run Sheet

Req #Requirement DescriptionTeam Responsible
Extraction Scope Definition- Identify the source systems and databases involved.
- Define the data objects (tables, fields, records) to be extracted.
- Establish business rules for data selection.

Syniti / LTC Data team

Extraction Methodology- Specify the extraction approach (full, incremental, or delta extraction).
- Determine the tools and technologies used.
- Define data filtering criteria to exclude irrelevant records.
Syniti 
Extraction Execution Plan- Establish execution timelines and batch processing schedules.
- Assign responsibilities for extraction monitoring.
- Document dependencies on other migration tasks.
Syniti
Data Quality and Validation- Define error handling mechanisms for extraction failures.Syniti


Selection Screen

Selection Ref ScreenParameter NameSelection TypeRequirementValue to be entered/set
Not applicable



















Data Collection Template (DCT)

The Data Collection Template (DCT) will not be applicable in this case. If there is a need to create a new Master Data (MD) for Inspection Methods object, the business must perform this activity in the source system. The newly created object will then be captured and migrated as part of the standard migration process.

Extraction Dependencies

1

Source System Availability

  • Ensure that the source database or application is accessible.
  • Confirm that necessary credentials and permissions are granted

Syensqo IT

2

Data Structure

  • Identify relationships between tables, views, and stored procedures.

Syniti

3

Referential Integrity

  • Ensure dependent records are extracted together.

Syniti

4

Extraction Methodology

  • Define whether extraction is full, incremental, or delta-based.
  • Establish batch processing schedules for large datasets.

Syniti

5

Performance and Scalability Considerations

  • Optimize extraction queries to prevent system overload.
  • Ensure network bandwidth supports data transfer volumes.

Syniti

6

Security and Compliance

  • Adhere to regulatory standards for sensitive information if applicable

Syniti

7

Data cleansing of legacy Material Master - QM View with assigned inspection type data must be completed.

If standardization within the DCT begins using relevant data from PF2 and WP2 before the cleansing is finalized, it is understood that the business will take due diligence to ensure any subsequent delta cleansing is verified and aligned within the DCT.

Business

Transformation

The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow to make the data Target ready:

  1. Perform value mapping and data transformation rules.
    1. Legacy values are mapped to the to-be values (this could include a default value)
    2. Values are transformed according to the rules defined in
  2. Prepare target-ready data in the structure and format that is required for loading via prescribed Load Tool. This step also produces the load data ready for business to perform Pre-load Data Validation

Transformation Run Sheet

Item #Step DescriptionTeam Responsible

1

Transformation Scope Definition

- Identify the source and target data structures.

- Define business rules for data standardization.

- Establish data cleansing requirements to remove inconsistencies.

Data Team

2

Data Mapping and Standardization

- Align source fields with target fields.

- Ensure unit consistency (e.g., currency, measurement units)

Data Team

3

Business Rule Application

- Implement data enrichment/collection if applicable

- Apply conditional transformations based on predefined logic/business rules

Data Team

4

Transformation Execution Plan

- Define batch processing schedules.

- Assign responsibilities for monitoring execution.

- Establish error-handling mechanisms

Syniti


Transformation Rules

Rule #Source systemSource TableSource FieldSource DescriptionTarget SystemTarget TableTarget FieldTarget DescriptionTransformation Logic
1PF2/WP2QMTBWERKSPlantS/4 HANAQMTBWERKSPlant

R. Xref from Legacy to S4

SpP and P&C will use one central plant (for each of them) to store all QM Master Data, then assign them to plant/materials across the world. Composite will store QM Master Data independently plant by plant. A dedicated Plant per GBU will be created in order to maintain all the QM Master Data within it and to be used for the specific GBU when needed.
P&C (ex-TS + ex-Noveare): QM01
SpP: QM02
Composite: No dedicated plant is required

2PF2/WP2QMTBPMTNRInspection MethodS/4 HANAQMTBPMTNRInspection MethodR. Copy from source system
3PF2/WP2QMTBVERSIONVersionS/4 HANAQMTBVERSIONVersionS.Internal
4PF2/WP2QMTBGUELTIGABValid-From DateS/4 HANAQMTBGUELTIGABValid-From Date

R.Copy from Source system.

Keep the ECC start date as the S/4 effective-from date

5PF2/WP2QMTBLOEKZStatusS/4 HANAQMTBLOEKZStatus

C. Copy from Source system.
Migrate both status 1 (Being Created) and status 2 (Released) records


6PF2/WP2QMTBSORTFELDSearch FieldS/4 HANAQMTBSORTFELDSearch FieldC. Copy from source system
7PF2/WP2DRADDOKARlinked Document TypeS/4 HANADRADDOKARlinked Document TypeC. Copy from source system
8PF2/WP2DRADDOKTLDocument PartS/4 HANADRADDOKTLDocument PartC. Copy from source system
9PF2/WP2DRADDOKVRDocument VersionS/4 HANADRADDOKVRDocument VersionC. Internal
10PF2/WPF2DRADDOKNRDocument NumberS/4 HANADRADDDOKNRDocument Number

C. Copy from source system

(DRAD-DOKOB=QMTBDOC)

11PF2/WP2QMTBDUMMY10Info field 1S/4 HANAQMTBDUMMY10Info field 1C. Copy from source system
12PF2/WP2QMTBDUMMY20Info field 2S/4 HANAQMTBDUMMY20Info field 2C. Copy from source system
13PF2/WP2QMTBDUMMY40Info field 3S/4 HANAQMTBDUMMY40Info field 3C. Copy from source system
14PF2/WP2QMTTWERKSPlantS/4 HANAQMTTWERKSPlant

R. Xref from Legacy to S4

SpP and P&C will use one central plant (for each of them) to store all QM Master Data, then assign them to plant/materials across the world. Composite will store QM Master Data independently plant by plant. A dedicated Plant per GBU will be created in order to maintain all the QM Master Data within it and to be used for the specific GBU when needed.
TS: QM01
SpP: QM02
Composite: No dedicated plant is required

15PF2/WP2QMTTPMTNRInspection MethodS/4 HANAQMTTPMTNRInspection MethodR. Copy from source system
16PF2/WP2QMTTVERSIONVersionS/4 HANAQMTTVERSIONVersionS.Internal
17PF2/WP2QMTTSPRACHELanguageS/4 HANAQMTTSPRACHELanguageR. Copy from source system
18PF2/WP2QMTTKURZTEXT
Short Text
S/4 HANAQMTTKURZTEXT
Short Text
C. Copy from source system
19PF2/WP2STXHTDOBJECTText ObjectS/4HANASTXHTDOBJECTText ObjectDefault to"QPMETHODE"
20PF2/WP2STXHTDNAMEText NameS/4HANASTXHTDNAMEText Name The STXH table data will be migrated as-is from the current system to S/4HANA, with no modifications, ensuring consistency and traceability of existing records.
TDNAME = MANDT+ WERKS + PMTNR + VERSION + SPRACHE(Language)
21PF2/WP2STXHTDIDText IDS/4HANASTXHTDIDText ID The STXH table data will be migrated as-is from the current system to S/4HANA, with no modifications, ensuring consistency and traceability of existing records.
Default to 'QMTT'
22PF2/WP2STXHTDSPRASLanguage KeyS/4HANASTXHTDSPRASLanguage KeyThe STXH table data will be migrated as-is from the current system to S/4HANA, with no modifications, ensuring consistency and traceability of existing records.
23PF2/WP2STXHTDVERSIONVersion Number of TextS/4HANASTXHTDVERSIONVersion Number of TextThe STXH table data will be migrated as-is from the current system to S/4HANA, with no modifications, ensuring consistency and traceability of existing records.
24PF2/WP2STXLCLUSTDText Line (Compressed)S/4HANASTXLCLUSTDText Line (Compressed)The STXL table data will be migrated as-is from the current system to S/4HANA, with no modifications, ensuring consistency and traceability of existing records.
24PF2/WP2STXLTDOBJECTText Object (Reference from STXH)S/4HANASTXLTDOBJECTText ObjectDefault to"QPMETHODE"
26PF2/WP2STXLTDNAMEText NameS/4HANASTXLTDNAMEText Name The STXH table data will be migrated as-is from the current system to S/4HANA, with no modifications, ensuring consistency and traceability of existing records.
TDNAME = MANDT+ WERKS + PMTNR + VERSION + SPRACHE(Language)


Transformation Mapping

Mapping Table NameMapping Table Description
PlantMapping of legacy Plants to To-Be Plants in S/4HANA

Transformation Dependencies

List the steps that need to occur before transformation can commence
Item #Step DescriptionTeam Responsible

1

Value Mappings are according to the latest design - <List of Value Mappings>

SyWay Data Team


Pre-Load Validation

Project Team

Completeness

TaskAction

Compare Data Counts

  1. Verify row counts between source and target databases.
  2. Identify missing or duplicated records.

Validate the mandatory fields

Validate there is value for all the mandatory fields

Validate Primary Keys and Unique Constraints

  1. Check for duplicate or missing primary key values.
  2. Ensure unique constraints are maintained.

Test Referential Integrity

Confirm dependent records exist in related tables


Accuracy

TaskAction

Validate the transformation

Validate the fields which require transformation have the value after transformation instead of the original field value

Check Data Consistency

  1. Compare field values across systems
  2. Validate data formats and structures

Business

Completeness

TaskAction

Compare Data Count

  1. Verify row counts between source and target databases.
  2. Identify missing or duplicated records.
Review populated templates for missing or incorrect valuesUse checklists to verify completeness and correctness before submission

Accuracy

TaskAction

Conversion Accuracy

Business Data Owner/s to verify that all the data in the load table/file is accurate as per endorsed transformation/ mapping rules (and signed-off DCT data).


Load

The load process includes:

  1. Execute the automated data load into target system using load tool or product the load file if the load must be done manually
  2. Once the data is loaded to the target system, it will be extracted and prepared for Post Load Data Validation

Load Run Sheet

Item #Step DescriptionTeam Responsible

1

Load Scope Definition

- Identify the target system and database structure.

- Define data objects (tables, fields, records) to be loaded.

- Establish business rules for data validation.

Data team

2

Load Methodology

- Specify the loading tools and technologies (Migration Cockpit, LSMW, custom loading program).

Syniti 

3

Data Quality and Validation

- Ensure data integrity checks (null values, duplicates, format validation).

- Perform pre-load validations to verify completeness.

- Define error handling mechanisms for load failures

Syniti 

4

Load Execution Plan

- Establish execution timelines and batch processing schedules.

- Assign responsibilities for monitoring execution.

- Document dependencies on other migration tasks

Syniti

5

Logging and Reporting

- Maintain detailed logs of loading activities.

- Generate summary reports on loaded data volume and quality.

- Define escalation procedures for errors

Syniti


Load Phase and Dependencies

The Inspection Methods will be loaded in the pre-cutover (PreCutover 4 phase) period.

Before loading, it will have dependency on the following configuration and data objects in the S/4 HANA.

Configuration


Item #Configuration Item
1MARA - General Material Data
2MARC - Material Plant data
3T001W - Plants/Branches

Conversion Objects

Object #Preceding Object Conversion Approach
2009Material Master (QM View must exist before Inspection methods)

Error Handling

Error TypeError DescriptionAction Taken
1Material Master (QM View) does not exist for the plant/material combinationEnsure that the Material Master with QM View is created and valid before plan migration


Post-Load Validation

Project Team

Completeness

TaskAction

Validate Record count in the backend

Validate all tables with prefix “QMTB” has the same records as the loading file

Display Records

Pick up a few random Inspection Methods, and run t-code: QS33 to validate the Material Listing and Exclusions can be displayed without any error.

Perform Source-to-Target Comparisons

  1. Validate that migrated data matches source records.
  2. Check for discrepancies in numerical values, text fields, and timestamps

Validation reports


Accuracy

TaskAction

Execute Sample Queries and Reports

  1. Run queries to validate business logic.
  2. Generate reports to compare expected vs. actual results

Conduct Post-Migration Reconciliation

Generate reports comparing pre- and post-migration data.


Business

Post-load validation is a critical step in data migration, ensuring that transferred data is accurate, complete, and functional within the target system.

1. Ensuring Data Integrity
After migration, data must be consistent with its original structure. Post-load validation checks for missing records, incorrect mappings, and formatting errors to prevent discrepancies.
2. Business Continuity
Faulty data can disrupt operations, leading to financial losses and inefficiencies. Validating post-load data ensures that applications function as expected, preventing downtime.
3. Error Detection and Resolution
By validating data post-migration, businesses can detect anomalies early, reducing the cost and effort required for corrections


Completeness

TaskAction
Perform Source-to-Target Comparisons
  1. Validate that migrated data matches source records.
  2. Check for discrepancies in numerical values, text fields, and timestamps
Conduct Post-Migration ReconciliationGo through reports comparing pre- and post-migration data.

Accuracy

TaskAction

Perform Manual Testing

Conduct manual spot-checks for additional assurance.


Key Assumptions

  • Master Data Standard is up to date as on the date of documenting this conversion approach and data load.
  • Inspection Methods is in scope based on data design and any exception requested by business.
  • Data cleansing has met the required percentage threshold for the specified mock cycle and all preparation activities have been completed.
  • Data entries in DCT are target-ready data unless a specific transformation rule is stated for that field in the transformation rules.



See also


Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 25) Feb 24, 2026 11:41 REDDY-ext, Naren Removed the CUI object statement from Purpose
v. 30 Feb 17, 2026 14:42 REDDY-ext, Naren Updated the dct for Long text fields
v. 29 Feb 16, 2026 14:22 REDDY-ext, Naren Added column in DCT for mapping
v. 28 Feb 16, 2026 14:20 REDDY-ext, Naren Split the QMTT to separate sheet
v. 27 Feb 09, 2026 14:11 REDDY-ext, Naren Update DCT template alignment
v. 26 Feb 09, 2026 14:10 REDDY-ext, Naren Updated DCT section
v. 25 Nov 28, 2025 14:54 REDDY-ext, Naren Updated the Validation reports link(Post load validation)
v. 24 Nov 27, 2025 11:41 REDDY-ext, Naren Removed STXH-TDLOCK, STXL-TDSPO from transformation rules
v. 23 Nov 17, 2025 02:56 REDDY-ext, Naren Updated the scope of CUI
v. 22 Nov 06, 2025 10:57 REDDY-ext, Naren

Go to Page History

Workflow history

Title Last Updated By Updated Status  
There are no pages at the moment.

  • No labels