Please see the SAP Analytics Approach document, section 'Documentation' for more information about the context of this document.

High-Level Specification

Functional Overview

Why the report is needed

Syensqo requires a consolidated report to provide visibility into the SRA (Syensqo Recognition Awards) program, including spend, nomination patterns, and distribution across businesses and demographics, both globally and per entity.

Business requirements addressed

• Monitor SRA program usage and spend
• Analyze nomination behavior by nominator
• Assess fairness and equity of recognition award distribution
• Support budget monitoring across GBUs and countries

Business questions answered

• Which nominators submit the most SRA nominations?
• How are SRAs distributed by entity, country, award level, gender, and talent attributes?
• What is the total and average SRA spend by organizational and demographic dimensions?
• Are there equity issues in how recognition awards are distributed?

Business value

The report enables Total Rewards and HR leadership to monitor recognition spend, evaluate program effectiveness, and identify potential equity or consistency issues in the distribution of recognition awards.

Scope

In Scope

• Number of employees nominated per nominator
• Number of SRAs by entity, country, award level, gender
• Total SRA amount spent by entity, country, award level, gender
• Average and median SRA amount per level, entity, and country
• Year‑based analysis (annual split or adjustable start/end dates)
• Drill‑down to individual employee level
• Analysis by talent flags, job, pay grade, SRA justification, requestor, and manager

Out of Scope

• Inactive employees

Solution Overview

Content ownership: BILLING-ext, Anoop 
Input from: Guillaume Decarsin, Ruben Beeck

Security: Standard SuccessFactors Role‑Based Permissions (RBP) apply. Visibility is restricted based on user role and authorized scope (global vs entity/country).

Story Page 1 – SRA Nominators & SRA Analysis

Page Objective

Provide a multi‑dashboard analytical view of SRA nominations and spend, enabling year‑by‑year analysis, equity checks, and drill‑down to employee‑level details.

Page Filters

Page Level Input Controls

• Dimension selector allowing users to switch analysis view by:
  • Entity
  • Country
  • Award Level
  • Gender
  • Talent Flags
  • Pay Grade
  • GBU

Calculations

The report includes the following calculated metrics:

• Total number of employees
• FTE
• Total SRA amount spent
• Average SRA amount per reward
• Total number of rewards
• SRA count
• Median SRA amount (where applicable)

Layout

• Page filters pinned at the top
• Syensqo logo top‑left
• Summary KPIs
• Charts (with dimension input controls)
• Detailed employee‑level table

Dashboards / Charts

Summary KPIs (Numerical):

• Total number of employees
• FTE
• Total amount spent
• Average per reward
• Total number of rewards
• SRA count

Charts:

• SRA count vs selected dimension (Entity / Country / Award Level / Gender / Talent Flag / Pay Grade / GBU) – Bar chart
• Number of rewards vs Average per reward (toggle via input control) – Bar chart
• Total amount spent vs selected dimension – Bar chart

All charts support interactive filtering and drill‑down.

Tables / Lists

Table 1 – Employee‑Level SRA Details

Story Filters (Global)

Data Models

Business Roles

Design Rationale

No existing report in the reporting catalog provides the required multi‑dimensional analysis of SRA nominations and spend. A custom SuccessFactors Story Report is required to support equity analysis, budget monitoring, and detailed drill‑down.

Assumptions

• Only active employees are included
• SRA data is available for the selected year(s)
• Award levels, talent flags, and demographic attributes are correctly maintained

Dependencies

• Availability and quality of SRA / Rewards data
• Confirmation of RBP scopes for global vs local users

Special Requirements

• Mandatory annual split or adjustable date range
• Drill‑down from charts to individual employee details
• Ability to analyze each year separately

Frequency of Analysis / Report Run

Testing Considerations / Dependencies

• Validate SRA counts and total spend
• Validate average and median calculations
• Validate year‑by‑year separation
• Validate drill‑down behavior
• Validate access by role and scope

Test Conditions and Expected Results

Other Requirements

None identified.

Screenshots

This is an example of the possible layout and also how dimension inputs could look like (dimension inputs can be added to charts and allows users to select how they want to see the data, i.e., SRA payout vs. GBU or SRA payout vs. country)

The a table at the end of this page where users will be able to drill down to the employee level. 

See also

Change log