You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Status

  Approved

OwnerBECHTER-ext, Alex 
StakeholdersANGGREANI-ext, Lisa 
Jira Request ID

ERP-114 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Jira Development ID

ERP-557 - Getting issue details... STATUS

High- Level Specification

ParameterValue
Application SystemS/4 HANA (all instances)
Business Process Reference09.05.04.01. Process General Journal Entries

Functional Overview

This enhancement is to ensure that manual journals posted in the system have adequate supporting documents attached before they get routed for review and approval.

The primary purpose is to increase the degree of SOX compliance and to further tighten internal controls around manual journal entries and to drive up efficiency in the journal review process in the new S/4 HANA systems.

Internal controls exist at Syensqo around the existence of supporting documents for manually posted journals in the system. This is currently monitored via detective mechanisms at period-end that requires manual With the proposed enhancement it is safeguarded that

1.) the internal control is adhered to in all cases in a preventive manner rather than via detective monitoring activities at period-end

2.) Approvers/Reviewers don’t need to spend time rejecting journals that lack supporting documents which should lead to efficiency gains compared to the current state.

Scope and Objectives

This enhancement shall be applicable to manual journals posted via the below two Fiori applications and its respective successor apps in future S/4 HANA releases:

  • F4670A - Verify Currency Adjustment- New Version
  • F2457A - Verify General Journal Entries - New Version

Please note that Fiori app 'F4670A - Verify Currency Adjustment-New Version' also allows for bulk upload processing via Excel upload functionality. As part of this process, another enhancement (ERP-558) automatically attaches the Excel upload template as supporting document to all journals submitted for review in the respective upload batch. As such, the existence of a supporting document is system-assured if journal entries are entered via this mode of entry and therefore doesn't require further validation via this enhancement. Journals uploaded via Excel upload functionality shall be exempted from the validations proposed in this enhancement.

SAP standard does not provide similar validation features in its current S/4 HANA releases and also doesn't intend to implement any in the foreseeable future. An incident with SAP was logged to query about possible inclusions in the future roadmap designs for journal entries. While the request was acknowledged and generally understood as a legit requirement, SAP also pointed out that there is no roadmap item planned out currently to embed this feature into the standard product offerings in the foreseeable future. Please refer to OSS incident 858195/2025 for further reference.


Process Flow Diagram


Step

Description

Comment

1User launching Fiori app F4670A or F2457A
2Foreground entry mode selected by end-user
3User populates journal entry details and attempts to submit journal entry for review.
4Enhancement kicks in to validate if attachment has been provided.Trigger for enhancement to get prompted is 
5Error message gets issued if attachment is missing and submission of journal for review shall be blocked.
6User attaches supporting document to the journal entry. Then re-submits the journal for review.
7Enhancement gets prompted again. The check is successful hence the journal shall be passed on to the subsequent applications for further processing.

Assumptions

The following assumptions are taken for this custom development:

  • Fiori applications evolve over time as SAP is constantly improving its current product offerings. At the time of writing, the enhancement is applicable to journal entries posted via Fiori apps F4670A and F2457A which are the latest journal entry apps available in S/4 private cloud environments. If new apps are released by SAP in future releases that offer significantly better useability for journal entry processing, Syensqo may adopt these applications as new default entry methods for journal entries. The enhancement may need to be extended to those successor applications as well in future releases.
  • The enhancement shall be withdrawn once SAP adds the built feature into its scope of standard functionalities for journal entry processing.
  • The enhancement shall remain in place even if Syensqo decides to move away from a mandatory review process for high-value G/L journals to ensure compliance with internal controls and best practices for journal entry processing. Journals posted without adequate levels of support invite audit queries that may be difficult to resolve without proper justifications.

Dependencies

Security, Integrity and Controls


Configuration Requirements

Language Requirements

Special Requirements


Design Rationale

Functional Requirements

Proposed Technology to Use

Data Source Considerations

TableField NameComments/Calculation/Field Manipulation











Data Validation Considerations

TableField NameComments/Calculation/Field Manipulation













Custom Tables

Master Data

FieldDescriptionData Type/LengthValidation rule/ Value Help









Configuration Table

FieldDescriptionData Type/LengthValidation rule/ Value Help








Selection Screen Enhancement

Field NameDescription

Select:

Data Type/LengthDefault Value/ Validation rule/ Value HelpSelection Logic













Processing Logic



Volumetrics


Performance Considerations



Error Handling


Testing

How to Test

Test Conditions and Expected Results

IDConditionExpected Result










Test Considerations/Dependencies


Other Information


Development Details

Package

Package NameParent Package




Enhancement Implementation

Enhancement TypeStandard Definition NameCustom Implementation NameDesign Rationale Reference









Other Development Objects

Object TypeObject NamePurpose/High Level LogicDesign Rationale Reference








Appendix

Custom Authorization Group Naming Convention

This table is based on the Syensqo development standards document. It provides the naming conventions for authorization groups to associated with custom reports and tables to comply with security requirements.

ABAP

ZFIZMMZPSZCOZSDZBCZFIZCA
TABLESZFITZMMTZPSTZCOTZSDTZBCTZFITZCAT

See also


No files shared here yet.

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 3) Dec 19, 2025 13:05 CHEBOLU-ext, Madhava
v. 20 Dec 18, 2025 13:49 CHEBOLU-ext, Madhava
v. 19 Dec 17, 2025 20:22 CHEBOLU-ext, Madhava
v. 18 Dec 10, 2025 07:09 CHEBOLU-ext, Madhava
v. 17 Dec 10, 2025 02:17 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 16 Dec 09, 2025 12:06 CHEBOLU-ext, Madhava
v. 15 Dec 04, 2025 05:43 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 14 Dec 04, 2025 03:21 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 13 Oct 22, 2025 05:45 BECHTER-ext, Alex
v. 12 Oct 22, 2025 05:39 BECHTER-ext, Alex

Go to Page History

  • No labels